MENOGRAPHY TO UNDERSTAND PATTERNS OF INSTRUCTION IN GROUP WORK

L. Cooper-Smith, B. Davey
{"title":"MENOGRAPHY TO UNDERSTAND PATTERNS OF INSTRUCTION IN GROUP WORK","authors":"L. Cooper-Smith, B. Davey","doi":"10.33965/ijwi_2019171106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group work is regularly implemented as part of higher education learning. Much research has examined group work to determine both the impeding and facilitative factors, mostly from the perspective of the students’ experiences of group work. To address the negative factors of group work, it would be helpful to understand the perceptions instructors have about group work. In Australia, prospective employers consistently call for business graduates to be able to demonstrate collaborative teamwork skills as part of their employability skill set. Group work in undergraduate courses is seen as the appropriate mechanism for teamwork education. Collaborative teamwork skills are considered the second most sought after demonstratable skill in a prospective employee; communication skills being the most sought after. How then can universities engender a growth in online group work as a means of ensuring their online undergraduates are being educated to develop their collaborative teamwork skills? This research examined the perceptions of instructors about their group work experiences. A phenomenographic research approach was considered the most appropriate, as phenomenography allows for all variations of perceptions to be considered, regardless of other factors such as experience or discipline specificity. Phenomenography facilitates the closer examination of a phenomenon, for example, how students learn. By examining the perceptions individual instructors have about their role in group work, patterns of instruction were illuminated. The findings of the research are expressed as phenomenographic categories of conception. The categories of conception detail the perceptions an instructor has in relation to their pattern of instruction. The categories can be expressed on a continuum of less complex to more complex. The categories do not describe individual instructors, instead all of the instructors’ perceptions of group work. By understanding an instructor’s perceptions about group work, it is expected that changes in practice can be engendered.","PeriodicalId":245560,"journal":{"name":"IADIS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON WWW/INTERNET","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IADIS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON WWW/INTERNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ijwi_2019171106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group work is regularly implemented as part of higher education learning. Much research has examined group work to determine both the impeding and facilitative factors, mostly from the perspective of the students’ experiences of group work. To address the negative factors of group work, it would be helpful to understand the perceptions instructors have about group work. In Australia, prospective employers consistently call for business graduates to be able to demonstrate collaborative teamwork skills as part of their employability skill set. Group work in undergraduate courses is seen as the appropriate mechanism for teamwork education. Collaborative teamwork skills are considered the second most sought after demonstratable skill in a prospective employee; communication skills being the most sought after. How then can universities engender a growth in online group work as a means of ensuring their online undergraduates are being educated to develop their collaborative teamwork skills? This research examined the perceptions of instructors about their group work experiences. A phenomenographic research approach was considered the most appropriate, as phenomenography allows for all variations of perceptions to be considered, regardless of other factors such as experience or discipline specificity. Phenomenography facilitates the closer examination of a phenomenon, for example, how students learn. By examining the perceptions individual instructors have about their role in group work, patterns of instruction were illuminated. The findings of the research are expressed as phenomenographic categories of conception. The categories of conception detail the perceptions an instructor has in relation to their pattern of instruction. The categories can be expressed on a continuum of less complex to more complex. The categories do not describe individual instructors, instead all of the instructors’ perceptions of group work. By understanding an instructor’s perceptions about group work, it is expected that changes in practice can be engendered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解小组工作的教学模式
小组工作是高等教育学习的一部分。许多研究考察了小组工作,以确定阻碍和促进因素,主要是从学生的小组工作经验的角度。为了解决小组工作的负面因素,了解教师对小组工作的看法将会有所帮助。在澳大利亚,未来的雇主一直要求商业毕业生能够展示合作团队合作技能,作为他们就业技能的一部分。本科课程中的小组合作被认为是团队合作教育的适当机制。团队协作能力被认为是未来员工最看重的第二项技能;沟通技巧是最受追捧的。那么,大学如何才能促进在线小组作业的增长,以确保他们的在线本科生受到培养他们合作团队技能的教育?这项研究考察了教师对他们的小组工作经历的看法。现象学研究方法被认为是最合适的,因为现象学允许考虑所有变化的感知,而不考虑其他因素,如经验或学科特殊性。现象学有助于对现象进行更深入的研究,例如,学生是如何学习的。通过考察个别教师对他们在小组工作中的角色的看法,阐明了教学模式。研究的结果被表达为概念的现象学范畴。概念范畴详细说明了教师与其教学模式有关的感知。这些范畴可以用从较简单到较复杂的连续体来表示。这些类别并不描述个别教师,而是所有教师对小组工作的看法。通过了解教师对小组工作的看法,可以期望在实践中产生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONTRIBUTION OF MOBILE DEVICES TO STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING & PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS IN LABORATORY SETTINGS GES APP – MOBILE APPLICATION TO SUPPORT REFLECTION AND DOCUMENTATION OF GLOBAL EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS ENHANCING DIGITAL INCLUSION: A DUAL APPROACH TO ASSESSING HOMINERE AND SMART BREAK APP INVITING MUSIC STUDENTS TO IDENTIFY AS CONTENT CREATORS TO ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION AND LEARNING CREATING A NEW CROWDFUNDING CHANNEL FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH: EXPLORING THE USER NEEDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1