Assessment Of Shear Bond Strength And Failure Modes Between The Base And Bulk Resin Restorative Materials; An In Vitro Comparative Study

Jmmdc
{"title":"Assessment Of Shear Bond Strength And Failure Modes Between The Base And Bulk Resin Restorative Materials; An In Vitro Comparative Study","authors":"Jmmdc","doi":"10.58380/jmmdc.v1i2.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the comparative shear bond strength and failure modes between the base and bulk Resin restorative materials.Place of Study: Dental Materials Testing Laboratory, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Karachi.Study Design: In Vitro, Experimental StudyDuration of Study: One week (August 2021)Methodology: This experimental material research was conducted at the Dental Materials Test site, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Karachi. Using convenient sampling a total of 16 samples were prepared, eight had Z350 (Material A) while the other eight used Ceram X (Material B) as bulk restorative material sandwiched with GIC as the base material. Samples were made using two sheets of polytetrafluoroethylene mold. Every single sheet contained holes that were 4×2 mm (diameter X thickness). Firstly, these samples were placed in distilled water and later for complete polymerization in the incubator. After this, they were thermo cycled and ultimately checked for shear bond strength.Results: Material A presented the mean value of 148.522±113.928 with single mixed and all other adhesive failure modes, whereas, Material B showed single cohesive failure and the rest of the adhesive failures with a mean of 6062,76±2547,18. Conclusion: Sufficient bonging strengths were observed between the base and bulk resin restorative materials using the sandwich technique, however, Nano-composite “Ceram X” has demonstrated slightly better shear bond strength in comparison to Z350. In addition, adhesive failure in both groups clearly indicated the lack of an adhesive system in between the sandwich material.","PeriodicalId":286507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58380/jmmdc.v1i2.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the comparative shear bond strength and failure modes between the base and bulk Resin restorative materials.Place of Study: Dental Materials Testing Laboratory, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Karachi.Study Design: In Vitro, Experimental StudyDuration of Study: One week (August 2021)Methodology: This experimental material research was conducted at the Dental Materials Test site, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Karachi. Using convenient sampling a total of 16 samples were prepared, eight had Z350 (Material A) while the other eight used Ceram X (Material B) as bulk restorative material sandwiched with GIC as the base material. Samples were made using two sheets of polytetrafluoroethylene mold. Every single sheet contained holes that were 4×2 mm (diameter X thickness). Firstly, these samples were placed in distilled water and later for complete polymerization in the incubator. After this, they were thermo cycled and ultimately checked for shear bond strength.Results: Material A presented the mean value of 148.522±113.928 with single mixed and all other adhesive failure modes, whereas, Material B showed single cohesive failure and the rest of the adhesive failures with a mean of 6062,76±2547,18. Conclusion: Sufficient bonging strengths were observed between the base and bulk resin restorative materials using the sandwich technique, however, Nano-composite “Ceram X” has demonstrated slightly better shear bond strength in comparison to Z350. In addition, adhesive failure in both groups clearly indicated the lack of an adhesive system in between the sandwich material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基材与体树脂修复材料剪切粘结强度及破坏模式评估体外比较研究
目的:比较基材和块状树脂修复材料的剪切强度和破坏模式。研究地点:卡拉奇ishratt -ul- ibad Khan博士口腔健康科学研究所牙科材料检测实验室。研究设计:体外实验研究研究持续时间:一周(2021年8月)方法:本实验材料研究在卡拉奇ishratt -ul- ibad Khan博士口腔健康科学研究所牙科材料试验点进行。采用方便取样的方法共制备了16个样品,其中8个样品采用Z350(材料a),另外8个样品采用Ceram X(材料B)作为大块修复材料,中间夹有GIC作为基材。样品是用两片聚四氟乙烯模具制成的。每个单片包含孔洞4×2毫米(直径X厚度)。首先,将这些样品置于蒸馏水中,然后在培养箱中进行完全聚合。在此之后,它们被热循环并最终检查剪切粘合强度。结果:A材料单混合及其他粘结失效模式的平均值为148.522±113.928,B材料单粘结失效,其余粘结失效模式的平均值为6062、76±2547、18。结论:使用夹层技术可以观察到基材与大块树脂修复材料之间有足够的剪切强度,但纳米复合材料“Ceram X”的剪切强度略好于Z350。此外,两组的粘接失败清楚地表明夹层材料之间缺乏粘接系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Test article post Test THE NITTY-GRITTY OF WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE IN MEDICAL JOURNAL The Nitty-gritty Of Writing A Research Article In Medical Journal Assessment Of Shear Bond Strength And Failure Modes Between The Base And Bulk Resin Restorative Materials; An In Vitro Comparative Study Mobilization Of First Rib Impairment Caused By Bone Thronged In Larynx (A Case Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1