Coal bottom ash as a sustainable supplementary cementitious material for the concrete exposed to seawater

S. A. Mangi, M. Ibrahim, N. Jamaluddin, M. Arshad, S. Memon, S. Shahidan, R. Jaya
{"title":"Coal bottom ash as a sustainable supplementary cementitious material for the concrete exposed to seawater","authors":"S. A. Mangi, M. Ibrahim, N. Jamaluddin, M. Arshad, S. Memon, S. Shahidan, R. Jaya","doi":"10.1063/1.5115361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performances of concrete construction exposed to seawater have been considered since long-time. It was generally perceived that the seawater effects could be decelerated by introducing supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in concrete, which probably reduces its penetrability. Lower penetrability retains the aggressive slats out of the concrete, slows leaching of soluble materials such as lime, reduces the carbonation depth, and better corrosion protection to the reinforcement. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the compressive strength performances of concrete with and without CBA exposed to seawater. In this study CBA was ground for 20 hours, to get particle fineness as comparable to the cement. Two types of concrete mixes were prepared; one is without ground CBA (M1) and another is with 10% of ground CBA (M2) as a SCM. Concrete cubes were prepared and immersed in normal water for 28 days, to get the desired strength. Afterward, samples were shifted in seawater. The specimens were evaluated for variation in compressive strength and change in weight under dual environments; normal water and seawater at 28, 56 and 90 days. It was experimentally determined that presence of CBA in concrete, raises the strength after 56 days. The strength of M2 concrete at 90 days, gives about 11.3% and 10.2% greater strength under normal water and seawater respectively as compared to M1 concrete. Hence, the CBA presence in concrete, reduces the penetration of aggressive salts, it is an indication of better durability performances of CBA concrete. The practical investigations concluded that the use of CBA as SCM improves the strength of concrete in normal water as well as in seawater environment.The performances of concrete construction exposed to seawater have been considered since long-time. It was generally perceived that the seawater effects could be decelerated by introducing supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in concrete, which probably reduces its penetrability. Lower penetrability retains the aggressive slats out of the concrete, slows leaching of soluble materials such as lime, reduces the carbonation depth, and better corrosion protection to the reinforcement. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the compressive strength performances of concrete with and without CBA exposed to seawater. In this study CBA was ground for 20 hours, to get particle fineness as comparable to the cement. Two types of concrete mixes were prepared; one is without ground CBA (M1) and another is with 10% of ground CBA (M2) as a SCM. Concrete cubes were prepared and immersed in normal water for 28 days, to get the desired strength. Afterward, samples were shifted in seawater. The specimens were evaluated...","PeriodicalId":294515,"journal":{"name":"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The performances of concrete construction exposed to seawater have been considered since long-time. It was generally perceived that the seawater effects could be decelerated by introducing supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in concrete, which probably reduces its penetrability. Lower penetrability retains the aggressive slats out of the concrete, slows leaching of soluble materials such as lime, reduces the carbonation depth, and better corrosion protection to the reinforcement. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the compressive strength performances of concrete with and without CBA exposed to seawater. In this study CBA was ground for 20 hours, to get particle fineness as comparable to the cement. Two types of concrete mixes were prepared; one is without ground CBA (M1) and another is with 10% of ground CBA (M2) as a SCM. Concrete cubes were prepared and immersed in normal water for 28 days, to get the desired strength. Afterward, samples were shifted in seawater. The specimens were evaluated for variation in compressive strength and change in weight under dual environments; normal water and seawater at 28, 56 and 90 days. It was experimentally determined that presence of CBA in concrete, raises the strength after 56 days. The strength of M2 concrete at 90 days, gives about 11.3% and 10.2% greater strength under normal water and seawater respectively as compared to M1 concrete. Hence, the CBA presence in concrete, reduces the penetration of aggressive salts, it is an indication of better durability performances of CBA concrete. The practical investigations concluded that the use of CBA as SCM improves the strength of concrete in normal water as well as in seawater environment.The performances of concrete construction exposed to seawater have been considered since long-time. It was generally perceived that the seawater effects could be decelerated by introducing supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in concrete, which probably reduces its penetrability. Lower penetrability retains the aggressive slats out of the concrete, slows leaching of soluble materials such as lime, reduces the carbonation depth, and better corrosion protection to the reinforcement. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the compressive strength performances of concrete with and without CBA exposed to seawater. In this study CBA was ground for 20 hours, to get particle fineness as comparable to the cement. Two types of concrete mixes were prepared; one is without ground CBA (M1) and another is with 10% of ground CBA (M2) as a SCM. Concrete cubes were prepared and immersed in normal water for 28 days, to get the desired strength. Afterward, samples were shifted in seawater. The specimens were evaluated...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粉煤灰作为海水暴露混凝土的可持续补充胶凝材料
长期以来,人们一直在研究海水作用下混凝土结构的性能。人们普遍认为,在混凝土中引入补充胶凝材料(SCM)可以减缓海水效应,但这可能会降低混凝土的穿透性。较低的渗透性保留了混凝土中的侵略性板条,减缓了石灰等可溶性物质的浸出,减少了碳化深度,并更好地保护了钢筋的腐蚀。因此,本研究旨在评估添加和不添加CBA的混凝土在海水中的抗压强度性能。在本研究中,CBA被研磨20小时,以获得与水泥相当的颗粒细度。配制了两种混凝土配合比;一个是没有接地CBA (M1),另一个是有10%的接地CBA (M2)作为SCM。准备混凝土立方体,在正常水中浸泡28天,以获得所需的强度。之后,样本在海水中移动。评估了试样在双重环境下的抗压强度变化和重量变化;正常水和海水分别为28、56和90天。实验结果表明,CBA在混凝土中的存在,使混凝土的强度在56天后有所提高。与M1混凝土相比,M2混凝土在普通水和海水下的90天强度分别提高了11.3%和10.2%。因此,CBA在混凝土中的存在减少了侵蚀性盐的渗透,这表明CBA混凝土具有更好的耐久性。实际研究表明,CBA作为SCM在正常水和海水环境下均能提高混凝土的强度。长期以来,人们一直在研究海水作用下混凝土结构的性能。人们普遍认为,在混凝土中引入补充胶凝材料(SCM)可以减缓海水效应,但这可能会降低混凝土的穿透性。较低的渗透性保留了混凝土中的侵略性板条,减缓了石灰等可溶性物质的浸出,减少了碳化深度,并更好地保护了钢筋的腐蚀。因此,本研究旨在评估添加和不添加CBA的混凝土在海水中的抗压强度性能。在本研究中,CBA被研磨20小时,以获得与水泥相当的颗粒细度。配制了两种混凝土配合比;一个是没有接地CBA (M1),另一个是有10%的接地CBA (M2)作为SCM。准备混凝土立方体,在正常水中浸泡28天,以获得所需的强度。之后,样本在海水中移动。对标本进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of wind energy potential in Sindh, Pakistan To analyze the effect of road traffic noise on surrounding buildings Indoor air CO2 assessment of classrooms of educational institutes of hyderabad city and its comparison with other countries Numerical investigation of effect of aeration rate on ethanol production Removal of bulk pollutants from wastewater through river sand during gravity and suction flow process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1