Substitution of Kasila Group Basalt with the Archean Man Gneiss in Asphalt and Hydraulic Concrete Mix Design (Sierra Leone)

I. Sow, I. Cissé
{"title":"Substitution of Kasila Group Basalt with the Archean Man Gneiss in Asphalt and Hydraulic Concrete Mix Design (Sierra Leone)","authors":"I. Sow, I. Cissé","doi":"10.4236/ojce.2019.94021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \nstudy of the performances of the Archean of Man gneiss aggregates with the \naddition of filler to replace the basalt of Kasila group in the asphalt and concrete mix design of southern Sierra Leone is presented in this document. The goal is to compare the results of the asphalt and concrete \nmix design with gneiss and basalt aggregate. The applied methods and design used are 1) Volumetric design and Marshall method for the \nasphalt, 2) French Dreux-Gorisse Method for the concrete. We added 2% of gneissic filler and 2% portland cement \ntype 42.5 R to the \nasphalt hot mix with the gneiss aggregates to follow the criteria variation. The Marshall, the \ndiametric compression and the Duriez tests require us to perform four different types of mix \ndesign. The \nfour mix designs meet the requirements but F2 and F4 give the best mechanical \nproperties. F2 \n(gneiss + 2% filler) and F4 (basalt) \nhave many similarities from which we can conclude their interchangeability. F2 gives 5255 of optimal \nbitumen content. In regards to hydraulic \nconcrete, the results of the compressive strength test (cement content 350 kg CMI 42.5 R/m3) with the \ngneiss and basalt aggregates are respectively 40 MPa and 45 MPa at 28 days curing: these values are greater than \n35 MPa \nrequired by the technical specifications. The use of the Super Fluid ® Thermoplast 120 \nadmixture, to increase the concrete compressive strength, is justified by the \nrequirement of a minimum of 80% Rc28 at 24 hours. For both types of \nconcrete, we have at 24 hours, 34 and 35 MPa which are higher than the minimum \nof 32 MPa (in \n24 h). \nThese results meet the requirements of the technical specifications.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"891 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the performances of the Archean of Man gneiss aggregates with the addition of filler to replace the basalt of Kasila group in the asphalt and concrete mix design of southern Sierra Leone is presented in this document. The goal is to compare the results of the asphalt and concrete mix design with gneiss and basalt aggregate. The applied methods and design used are 1) Volumetric design and Marshall method for the asphalt, 2) French Dreux-Gorisse Method for the concrete. We added 2% of gneissic filler and 2% portland cement type 42.5 R to the asphalt hot mix with the gneiss aggregates to follow the criteria variation. The Marshall, the diametric compression and the Duriez tests require us to perform four different types of mix design. The four mix designs meet the requirements but F2 and F4 give the best mechanical properties. F2 (gneiss + 2% filler) and F4 (basalt) have many similarities from which we can conclude their interchangeability. F2 gives 5255 of optimal bitumen content. In regards to hydraulic concrete, the results of the compressive strength test (cement content 350 kg CMI 42.5 R/m3) with the gneiss and basalt aggregates are respectively 40 MPa and 45 MPa at 28 days curing: these values are greater than 35 MPa required by the technical specifications. The use of the Super Fluid ® Thermoplast 120 admixture, to increase the concrete compressive strength, is justified by the requirement of a minimum of 80% Rc28 at 24 hours. For both types of concrete, we have at 24 hours, 34 and 35 MPa which are higher than the minimum of 32 MPa (in 24 h). These results meet the requirements of the technical specifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用太古宙片麻岩代替Kasila群玄武岩在沥青和水工混凝土配合比设计中的应用(塞拉利昂)
本文研究了太古代Man片麻岩骨料添加填料替代塞拉利昂南部Kasila群玄武岩的沥青和混凝土配合比设计的性能。目的是比较片麻岩和玄武岩骨料沥青和混凝土配合比设计的结果。应用的方法和设计是1)沥青的体积设计和马歇尔法,2)混凝土的法国德鲁-戈里斯法。我们在含片麻岩骨料的沥青热混合料中加入2%的片麻岩填料和2%的42.5 R型波特兰水泥,遵循标准变化。马歇尔试验,直径压缩试验和杜里兹试验要求我们进行四种不同类型的混合设计。四种配合比设计均满足要求,但F2和F4的力学性能最好。F2(片麻岩+ 2%填料)和F4(玄武岩)有许多相似之处,由此可以得出它们的互换性。F2给出最佳沥青含量5255。水工混凝土方面,片麻岩和玄武岩骨料28天养护抗压强度(水泥掺量350kg CMI 42.5 R/m3)试验结果分别为40mpa和45mpa,均大于技术规范要求的35mpa。使用超级流体®热塑性塑料120外加剂,以增加混凝土的抗压强度,是合理的要求至少80%的Rc28在24小时内。对于这两种类型的混凝土,我们在24小时,34和35 MPa高于最小32 MPa(24小时),这些结果符合技术规范的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interchange Sight Distance and Design: Aspects and Implementation A Slip-Force Device for Maintaining Constant Lateral Pressure on Retaining Structures in Expansive Soils Practical Engineering Behavior of Egyptian Collapsible Soils, Laboratory and In-Situ Experimental Study Structural Health Monitoring for Reinforced Concrete Containment Using Inner Electrical Resistivity Method Hardening Properties of Foamed Concrete with Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Desulfurization Gypsum as the Binder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1