Effect of Standardized Electronic Test of Science on Learning Motivation

O. Aldalalah, ZyadWaleed Mohamed Ababneh, M. Nawas, Reem Ahmad Albatayneh
{"title":"Effect of Standardized Electronic Test of Science on Learning Motivation","authors":"O. Aldalalah, ZyadWaleed Mohamed Ababneh, M. Nawas, Reem Ahmad Albatayneh","doi":"10.30845/jesp.v6n2p15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at constructing a science achievement test for the first basic grade, and comparing its application method (paper, electronic) on Its psychometric properties and learning motivation, to achieve that an achievement science test based on the first basic class science textbook of (25) questions was constructed The two versions of the tests were applied on a sample of (103) students in governmental and private schools in Al-Karak Governate (Southern Al-Mazar District) during the first semester 2017/2018. The results of the study showed that there was reliability coefficient for both the tests which is associated with a criterion. There were high validity indicators for both tests. There were statistical differences in the validity in favor of the electronic test whereas there were statistical differences in the reliability in favor of the electronic test. There were statistical differences at the level of statistical significance in transactions trueness which is associated with a criterion, according to the type of test and for the favor of the electronic test. There were statistically significant differences in learning motivation according to type of test and for electronic test.","PeriodicalId":170810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n2p15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at constructing a science achievement test for the first basic grade, and comparing its application method (paper, electronic) on Its psychometric properties and learning motivation, to achieve that an achievement science test based on the first basic class science textbook of (25) questions was constructed The two versions of the tests were applied on a sample of (103) students in governmental and private schools in Al-Karak Governate (Southern Al-Mazar District) during the first semester 2017/2018. The results of the study showed that there was reliability coefficient for both the tests which is associated with a criterion. There were high validity indicators for both tests. There were statistical differences in the validity in favor of the electronic test whereas there were statistical differences in the reliability in favor of the electronic test. There were statistical differences at the level of statistical significance in transactions trueness which is associated with a criterion, according to the type of test and for the favor of the electronic test. There were statistically significant differences in learning motivation according to type of test and for electronic test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学标准化电子测验对学习动机的影响
本研究旨在建构一套小学一年级科学成就测验,并比较其使用方法(纸本与电子)的心理测量性质与学习动机。为实现这一目标,根据第一本基础科学教科书编制了一份包含25个问题的成就科学测试。2017/2018年第一学期,在Al-Karak省(Al-Mazar南部地区)公立学校和私立学校的103名学生样本中应用了两个版本的测试。研究结果表明,这两个测试都有信度系数,信度系数与一个准则有关。两项测试的效度指标均较高。电子测验在效度上有统计学差异,而在信度上有统计学差异。交易真实性与标准相关,根据测试类型和电子测试的青睐,在统计显著性水平上存在统计学差异。不同类型测验和电子测验的学习动机差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From RAE to REF: Trust and Atmosphere in UK Higher Education Reform Religious Education of Lifelong Learning in Taiwan Weixin Shengjiao I Ching University The Manifestation of Alienation in Sylvia Plath’s the Bell Jar Female Technology Leaders Overcome Barriers to Climb the US Industry Ladder Debunking Hattie: Evaluating the Contribution of Academic Studies to Policy Development and Implementation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1