Editor’s Letter

Brian R. Bruce
{"title":"Editor’s Letter","authors":"Brian R. Bruce","doi":"10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DaviD anTin CEO Dave BliDe Publisher We open the Spring issue with Mozes and Steffens, who introduce a model for forecasting future volatility using fundamental factors. These fundamental factors include the extent to which the market’s valuation deviates from its predicted value, the losses reported by companies with negative earnings, projected earnings growth rates, and Treasury bill rates. Chung and Kissell then propose a transaction cost analysis portfolio optimization procedure that incorporates transaction costs directly into the problem of the objective function of portfolio optimization. Their results show that a manager can start with a seemingly suboptimal or inefficient ex ante portfolio in traditional mean variance space and earn higher ex post net returns after accounting for transaction costs. Sommer and Pasquali discuss the lack of a universally agreed upon and adopted measure or model that adequately captures cost and time to liquidation in bond (OTC) markets. After a review of 40 years of research, they propose a more adequate measure and further suggest that machine learning methods are a natural candidate to overcome the main obstacles. Next, Polidore, Jiang, and Li study methods of altering the standard approach to volume weighted average price such that it respects stock-specific volume volatility. They also argue that traders should not choose algorithms based on stock characteristics; instead, algorithm choice should focus on the tradeoff between cost and timing risk. Ceccon, Thukral, and Eleuterio evaluate momentum strategies. They look at four popular languages used by quantitative researchers and traders to program their models from a performance point of view while considering how easy it is to obtain programs that run in an acceptable amount of time. In our special section on market structure and trading related activities, Virgilio presents the results of an agent-based model simulation under two different cases: a quiet situation and a market following a trend. Results suggests that the interaction between high-frequency and low-frequency traders, rather than the mere participation of high-frequency traders, may be the main cause of higher-than-normal volatility. Lewis and McPartland describe the CHX SNAP, the proposed intraday, on-demand auction service of the Chicago Stock Exchange, which represents the first significant attempt to incorporate batch auctions into U.S. equity markets. If commercially successful, the CHX SNAP auction would allow institutional traders to leave hidden resting equity orders at the CHX out of the vision of digital traders that might otherwise attempt to profit from such knowledge. We conclude the issue with Kumiega, Sterijevski, and Van Vliet, who present an overview of the complexity of the automated market network and describe how market participants interact through the exchange mechanism. They define new terms and a new framework for understanding the risk of extreme market moves from a reliability and safety perspective. As always, we welcome your submissions. We value your comments and suggestions, so please email us at journals@investmentresearch.org.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DaviD anTin CEO Dave BliDe Publisher We open the Spring issue with Mozes and Steffens, who introduce a model for forecasting future volatility using fundamental factors. These fundamental factors include the extent to which the market’s valuation deviates from its predicted value, the losses reported by companies with negative earnings, projected earnings growth rates, and Treasury bill rates. Chung and Kissell then propose a transaction cost analysis portfolio optimization procedure that incorporates transaction costs directly into the problem of the objective function of portfolio optimization. Their results show that a manager can start with a seemingly suboptimal or inefficient ex ante portfolio in traditional mean variance space and earn higher ex post net returns after accounting for transaction costs. Sommer and Pasquali discuss the lack of a universally agreed upon and adopted measure or model that adequately captures cost and time to liquidation in bond (OTC) markets. After a review of 40 years of research, they propose a more adequate measure and further suggest that machine learning methods are a natural candidate to overcome the main obstacles. Next, Polidore, Jiang, and Li study methods of altering the standard approach to volume weighted average price such that it respects stock-specific volume volatility. They also argue that traders should not choose algorithms based on stock characteristics; instead, algorithm choice should focus on the tradeoff between cost and timing risk. Ceccon, Thukral, and Eleuterio evaluate momentum strategies. They look at four popular languages used by quantitative researchers and traders to program their models from a performance point of view while considering how easy it is to obtain programs that run in an acceptable amount of time. In our special section on market structure and trading related activities, Virgilio presents the results of an agent-based model simulation under two different cases: a quiet situation and a market following a trend. Results suggests that the interaction between high-frequency and low-frequency traders, rather than the mere participation of high-frequency traders, may be the main cause of higher-than-normal volatility. Lewis and McPartland describe the CHX SNAP, the proposed intraday, on-demand auction service of the Chicago Stock Exchange, which represents the first significant attempt to incorporate batch auctions into U.S. equity markets. If commercially successful, the CHX SNAP auction would allow institutional traders to leave hidden resting equity orders at the CHX out of the vision of digital traders that might otherwise attempt to profit from such knowledge. We conclude the issue with Kumiega, Sterijevski, and Van Vliet, who present an overview of the complexity of the automated market network and describe how market participants interact through the exchange mechanism. They define new terms and a new framework for understanding the risk of extreme market moves from a reliability and safety perspective. As always, we welcome your submissions. We value your comments and suggestions, so please email us at journals@investmentresearch.org.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑的信
我们以Mozes和Steffens为春季刊的开篇,他们介绍了一个利用基本面因素预测未来波动性的模型。这些基本因素包括市场估值偏离其预期值的程度、负收益公司报告的损失、预期收益增长率和国库券利率。Chung和Kissell提出了一个交易成本分析的投资组合优化过程,将交易成本直接纳入投资组合优化的目标函数问题中。他们的研究结果表明,在传统的平均方差空间中,经理人可以从一个看似次优或低效的事前投资组合开始,在考虑交易成本后获得更高的事后净回报。Sommer和Pasquali讨论了缺乏一个普遍认可和采用的措施或模型,以充分捕捉债券(OTC)市场清算的成本和时间。在回顾了40年的研究之后,他们提出了一个更充分的衡量标准,并进一步提出机器学习方法是克服主要障碍的自然候选方法。接下来,Polidore, Jiang和Li研究了改变成交量加权平均价格的标准方法,使其尊重股票特定成交量波动的方法。他们还认为,交易员不应该根据股票特征选择算法;相反,算法选择应该关注成本和时间风险之间的权衡。Ceccon, Thukral和Eleuterio评估了动量策略。他们从性能的角度考察了定量研究人员和交易员编写模型时使用的四种流行语言,同时考虑了获得在可接受的时间内运行的程序的难易程度。在我们关于市场结构和交易相关活动的特别章节中,Virgilio给出了基于主体的模型在两种不同情况下的模拟结果:安静的情况和跟随趋势的市场。结果表明,高频和低频交易者之间的相互作用,而不仅仅是高频交易者的参与,可能是高于正常波动的主要原因。Lewis和McPartland描述了CHX SNAP,即芝加哥证券交易所拟议的日内按需拍卖服务,这是将批量拍卖纳入美国股市的首次重大尝试。如果在商业上取得成功,CHX SNAP拍卖将允许机构交易员在CHX留下隐藏的剩余股权订单,否则数字交易员可能会试图从中获利。我们用Kumiega、Sterijevski和Van Vliet来总结这个问题,他们概述了自动化市场网络的复杂性,并描述了市场参与者如何通过交换机制进行互动。他们定义了新的术语和新的框架,从可靠性和安全性的角度来理解极端市场波动的风险。一如既往,我们欢迎您的投稿。我们非常重视您的意见和建议,所以请给我们发邮件至journals@investmentresearch.org。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phantom Liquidity and High-Frequency Quoting COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1 Editor’s Letter Machine Learning for Algorithmic Trading and Trade Schedule Optimization COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1