FROM MIONG TO DIGONG: THE DYNAMICS OF PHILIPPINE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS (1897-2016)

Archie B. Resos, Emmanuel Jeric A. Albela
{"title":"FROM MIONG TO DIGONG: THE DYNAMICS OF PHILIPPINE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS (1897-2016)","authors":"Archie B. Resos, Emmanuel Jeric A. Albela","doi":"10.51453/2354-1431/2022/861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elections have always been a vanguard of procedural democracy in the Philippines. From the time of the first presidential election in the Tejeros Convention in 1897 until the 2016 Presidential derby, the voice of the people has been instrumental in catapulting the chief executive to the seat of power in Malacañang Palace. It is interesting to note that the dynamics of Philippine presidential elections has been written by only a few scholars. This study attempts to provide the mechanism of elections including its results in determining the occupant of the highest position of the land which is held by the Office of the President. \nSince the first presidential election in 1897 with Emilio Aguinaldo as president, the outcome has always been marred with influence peddling and electioneering. The maturity of presidential election was further enhanced with the 1935 and 1941 Commonwealth election with Manuel L. Quezon at the helm of power. However, mudslinging and rumour-mongering became pronounced during this democratic exercise. After the death of Quezon, the Philippines witnessed its first presidential succession under Sergio Osmeña Sr. During the outbreak of World War II and the Japanese occupation in 1941, Jose P. Laurel was installed as president by the National Assembly controlled by the imperial government of Japan. \nAfter World War II, the election of Manuel Roxas, Elpidio Quirino, Ramon Magsaysay, Carlos Garcia, Diosdado Macapagal, Ferdinand Marcos, Corazon Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Benigno Simeon Aquino III and Rodrigo Duterte provided strength in the procedural aspect of democracy. It is in this context of the process of presidential electoral procedure that the following questions will be answered: what was the context of the presidential election of each chief executive?, what were the political parties involved and how they contend each other?, what were the significant election issues?, how was the presidential election conducted?, and what were the results?  ","PeriodicalId":158754,"journal":{"name":"SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51453/2354-1431/2022/861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elections have always been a vanguard of procedural democracy in the Philippines. From the time of the first presidential election in the Tejeros Convention in 1897 until the 2016 Presidential derby, the voice of the people has been instrumental in catapulting the chief executive to the seat of power in Malacañang Palace. It is interesting to note that the dynamics of Philippine presidential elections has been written by only a few scholars. This study attempts to provide the mechanism of elections including its results in determining the occupant of the highest position of the land which is held by the Office of the President. Since the first presidential election in 1897 with Emilio Aguinaldo as president, the outcome has always been marred with influence peddling and electioneering. The maturity of presidential election was further enhanced with the 1935 and 1941 Commonwealth election with Manuel L. Quezon at the helm of power. However, mudslinging and rumour-mongering became pronounced during this democratic exercise. After the death of Quezon, the Philippines witnessed its first presidential succession under Sergio Osmeña Sr. During the outbreak of World War II and the Japanese occupation in 1941, Jose P. Laurel was installed as president by the National Assembly controlled by the imperial government of Japan. After World War II, the election of Manuel Roxas, Elpidio Quirino, Ramon Magsaysay, Carlos Garcia, Diosdado Macapagal, Ferdinand Marcos, Corazon Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Benigno Simeon Aquino III and Rodrigo Duterte provided strength in the procedural aspect of democracy. It is in this context of the process of presidential electoral procedure that the following questions will be answered: what was the context of the presidential election of each chief executive?, what were the political parties involved and how they contend each other?, what were the significant election issues?, how was the presidential election conducted?, and what were the results?  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从miong到digong:菲律宾总统选举的动态(1897-2016)
在菲律宾,选举一直是程序民主的先锋。从1897年Tejeros大会的第一次总统选举到2016年的总统德比,人民的声音在将行政长官弹升到Malacañang宫的权力宝座上发挥了重要作用。有趣的是,菲律宾总统选举的动态只有少数学者撰写。本研究试图提供选举机制,包括其结果,以确定由总统办公室持有的土地最高位置的占有者。自从1897年埃米利奥·阿吉纳尔多(Emilio Aguinaldo)担任总统以来,选举结果总是被兜售影响力和竞选活动所玷污。在1935年和1941年的联邦选举中,曼努埃尔·奎松(Manuel L. Quezon)掌权,总统选举的成熟度进一步提高。然而,在这次民主活动中,诽谤和造谣变得明显。奎松去世后,菲律宾在老塞尔吉奥Osmeña的领导下首次进行了总统换届。1941年第二次世界大战爆发和日本占领期间,若泽·p·劳雷尔被日本帝国政府控制的国民议会任命为总统。第二次世界大战后,曼努埃尔·罗哈斯、埃尔皮迪奥·基里诺、拉蒙·麦格赛塞、卡洛斯·加西亚、迪奥斯达多·马卡帕加尔、费迪南德·马科斯、科拉松·阿基诺、菲德尔·拉莫斯、约瑟夫·埃斯特拉达、贝尼尼奥·西缅·阿基诺三世和罗德里戈·杜特尔特的当选为民主的程序方面提供了力量。在总统选举程序的背景下,以下问题将得到回答:每一位行政长官的总统选举的背景是什么?在美国,有哪些政党参与其中,他们又是如何相互竞争的?在美国,重要的选举议题是什么?总统选举是如何进行的?,结果如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LÝ LUẬN VỀ PHÁT TRIỂN NĂNG LỰC THIẾT KẾ VÀ TỔ CHỨC CÁC HOẠT ĐỘNG GIÁO DỤC STEM CHO GIÁO VIÊN TỈNH TUYÊN QUANG ĐÁP ỨNG CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GIÁO DỤC PHỔ THÔNG 2018 GIẢI PHÁP PHÁT TRIỂN NĂNG LỰC THIẾT KẾ VÀ TỔ CHỨC CÁC HOẠT ĐỘNG GIÁO DỤC STEM CHO GIÁO VIÊN TỈNH TUYÊN QUANG ĐÁP ỨNG CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GIÁO DỤC PHỔ THÔNG 2018 NHẬN THỨC CỦA SINH VIÊN TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC AN GIANG VỀ CÁC THÔNG TIN TRÊN MẠNG XÃ HỘI VÀ KÊNH THÔNG TIN CHÍNH THỐNG ĐỐI VỚI VẤN ĐỀ CHỦ QUYỀN LÃNH THỔ, BIÊN GIỚI QUỐC GIA A RESULT OF MEAN SQUARE EXPONENTIAL STABILITY FOR DIFFERENTIAL DELAY EQUATIONS WITH STOCHASTIC NOISE. ĐÁNH GIÁ HIỆU QUẢ CỦA HOẠT ĐỘNG TRUYỀN THÔNG MARKETING TRONG TUYỂN SINH ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY CỦA TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC KHOA HỌC - ĐẠI HỌC THÁI NGUYÊN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1