JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF THE POPULATION TO TERRITORIAL SELF-ORGANIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT PRACTICE

I. Umnova-Koniukhova, Popova Svetlana
{"title":"JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF THE POPULATION TO TERRITORIAL SELF-ORGANIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT PRACTICE","authors":"I. Umnova-Koniukhova, Popova Svetlana","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-7-059-066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study. The article examines topical problems of judicial protection of the population's right to territorial self-organization. This research seems to be relevant in connection with the problems that have arisen in practice, which require a comprehensive substantiation of the constitutional content of the population's right to territorial self-organization and an assessment of the existing judicial practice of considering territorial disputes in the system of local self-government in the Russian Federation. Conclusions. As a result of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that the provisions of Federal Law No. 131-ФЗ as amended by Federal Law No. 87-ФЗ dated 05/01/2019 and the judicial practice of recognizing a decision of a representative body as a form of consent of the population to change the boundaries of municipalities contradicts the constitutional right of the population on territorial self-organization. Such forms of democracy as a local referendum, general municipal discussion by the population or a general municipal poll should have an advantage, which will maximize the involvement of residents in resolving issues of the territorial structure at the municipal level.","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-7-059-066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study. The article examines topical problems of judicial protection of the population's right to territorial self-organization. This research seems to be relevant in connection with the problems that have arisen in practice, which require a comprehensive substantiation of the constitutional content of the population's right to territorial self-organization and an assessment of the existing judicial practice of considering territorial disputes in the system of local self-government in the Russian Federation. Conclusions. As a result of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that the provisions of Federal Law No. 131-ФЗ as amended by Federal Law No. 87-ФЗ dated 05/01/2019 and the judicial practice of recognizing a decision of a representative body as a form of consent of the population to change the boundaries of municipalities contradicts the constitutional right of the population on territorial self-organization. Such forms of democracy as a local referendum, general municipal discussion by the population or a general municipal poll should have an advantage, which will maximize the involvement of residents in resolving issues of the territorial structure at the municipal level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对俄罗斯联邦境内居民领土自我组织权利的司法保护:对现行做法的评价
研究目的:本文探讨了对人民领土自组织权的司法保护的专题问题。这项研究似乎与实践中出现的问题有关,这些问题需要全面证实人民领土自我组织权利的宪法内容,并评估在俄罗斯联邦地方自治制度中审议领土争端的现有司法实践。结论。通过研究,作者得出结论,经2019年1月5日第87号-ФЗ联邦法修正的第131号-ФЗ联邦法的规定,以及承认代表机构的决定是居民同意的一种改变城市边界的司法实践,与居民在领土自我组织方面的宪法权利相矛盾。诸如地方公民投票、由居民进行的一般性市政讨论或一般性市政投票等民主形式应该具有优势,因为这将最大限度地使居民参与解决市政一级的领土结构问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN MODERN REALITIES: PUBLIC-LEGAL AND PRIVATE LEGAL ASPECTS SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE CREATION OF A DATA MATRIX AS A PRIORITY INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE «SINGLE WINDOW» MECHANISM IN THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION CTP INSURANCE IN THE LEGAL ASPECT: NEW APPROACHES AND PROSPECTS CATEGORIES OF «SUFFICIENCY» AND «MERIT» WHEN DECIDING ON THE RELEASE OF A PERSON FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY ON EVALUATIVE GROUNDS PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN OF MOBILIZED CITIZENS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1