Enabling Within Constraints: Assessing International Aid's Impact Upon Cypriot Peacebuilding Organisations

M. Barrow
{"title":"Enabling Within Constraints: Assessing International Aid's Impact Upon Cypriot Peacebuilding Organisations","authors":"M. Barrow","doi":"10.1177/15423166231193197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous civil society organisations (CSOs) are receiving a larger proportion of international aid than ever before. The international community supplies them with financial support owing to the belief that they can effectively mediate between disputant communities. The impact of this situation attracts scholarly debate. Whereas scholars traditionally assert that recipients transform into service-delivery organisations tied to the interests of their donors, some allege that CSOs retain the agency to negotiate how funds are spent in accordance with their own priorities. By focusing on Cypriot peacebuilding CSOs, I add further nuance to this debate. I argue that international aid enables CSOs to carry out peacebuilding initiatives according to their underlying agenda, owing to several contextual factors, providing they adhere to donors’ expectations and restrictions. International aid cannot therefore be reduced to having a solely positive or negative impact – a more complex picture emerges, to some degree suiting both donors and CSOs.","PeriodicalId":424494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peacebuilding & Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peacebuilding & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166231193197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous civil society organisations (CSOs) are receiving a larger proportion of international aid than ever before. The international community supplies them with financial support owing to the belief that they can effectively mediate between disputant communities. The impact of this situation attracts scholarly debate. Whereas scholars traditionally assert that recipients transform into service-delivery organisations tied to the interests of their donors, some allege that CSOs retain the agency to negotiate how funds are spent in accordance with their own priorities. By focusing on Cypriot peacebuilding CSOs, I add further nuance to this debate. I argue that international aid enables CSOs to carry out peacebuilding initiatives according to their underlying agenda, owing to several contextual factors, providing they adhere to donors’ expectations and restrictions. International aid cannot therefore be reduced to having a solely positive or negative impact – a more complex picture emerges, to some degree suiting both donors and CSOs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在限制范围内实现:评估国际援助对塞浦路斯建设和平组织的影响
土著公民社会组织(cso)接受的国际援助比以往任何时候都多。国际社会向它们提供财政支持,因为相信它们能够有效地在有争议的社区之间进行调解。这种情况的影响引起了学术界的争论。传统上,学者们断言,受助人会转变为与捐赠者利益相关的服务提供组织,而一些人则声称,民间社会组织保留了协商机构,以便根据自己的优先事项使用资金。通过把重点放在塞浦路斯建设和平的民间社会组织上,我为这场辩论增添了进一步的细微差别。我认为,由于一些背景因素,国际援助使民间社会组织能够根据其基本议程开展建设和平行动,前提是他们遵守捐助者的期望和限制。因此,国际援助不能被简化为只产生积极或消极的影响——一种更复杂的情况出现了,在某种程度上适合捐助者和民间社会组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Local Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: Living Between Bottom-Up from Top-Down Peace in Provincial Egypt The Myth of Gaza's Reconstruction: The Rise and Fall of Reconstruction Space Under the Israeli Siege Is Sustainable Peace in Ukraine Possible? Contributions of Quality Peace Theory Peacebuilding and Social Change Through Soap Opera: The Two Elements of Moral Authority of ‘Team Kenya’ Autocratisation and Peacebuilding in Mozambique (2012–2019): Towards Illiberal Peace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1