Stakeholder views about social work programme curricula: One university's experiences of consulting stakeholders in the re-validation of qualifying social work programmes

Annabel Goodyer, Martyn Higgins
{"title":"Stakeholder views about social work programme curricula: One university's experiences of consulting stakeholders in the re-validation of qualifying social work programmes","authors":"Annabel Goodyer, Martyn Higgins","doi":"10.1921/146066910X541656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: This article describes the way in which consultations with stakeholders contributed to the re-validation of two UK qualifying social work programmes at a London University. The aim was to better position the new curricula in current practice realities. Consultations with service-users, employers, present and past students facilitated substantial revisions of the taught programme, with social work skills in particular receiving a much higher priority. The data generated by this study illustrates how the tensions inherent in the incorporation of differing standpoints can be reconciled through careful consideration and reflection.","PeriodicalId":446723,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/146066910X541656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary: This article describes the way in which consultations with stakeholders contributed to the re-validation of two UK qualifying social work programmes at a London University. The aim was to better position the new curricula in current practice realities. Consultations with service-users, employers, present and past students facilitated substantial revisions of the taught programme, with social work skills in particular receiving a much higher priority. The data generated by this study illustrates how the tensions inherent in the incorporation of differing standpoints can be reconciled through careful consideration and reflection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对社会工作课程的看法:一所大学在重新验证合格的社会工作课程时咨询利益相关者的经验
摘要:本文描述了与利益相关者协商的方式,有助于在伦敦大学重新验证两个英国合格的社会工作项目。其目的是使新课程更好地适应当前的实际情况。与服务使用者、雇主、现在和过去的学生进行协商,促进了教学方案的实质性修订,特别是社会工作技能得到了更高的优先考虑。本研究产生的数据说明了如何通过仔细考虑和反思来调和不同立场所固有的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Student Nurses values of peer assessment and debriefing within a simulation exercise. The practice educator as museum guide, art therapist or exhibition curator: a cross-disciplinary analysis of arts-based learning Group programs in corrections. Best practice meets real world Group supervision for social work students on placement Student social workers in school settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1