A Platform for Debating the Role of Organization in, for, and Throughout Society

Michael Grothe-Hammer, Robert Jungmann
{"title":"A Platform for Debating the Role of Organization in, for, and Throughout Society","authors":"Michael Grothe-Hammer, Robert Jungmann","doi":"10.1515/joso-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing this introductory essay for the journal on which we have worked for so many years entails some problems, not just emotionally (because we worked so hard on it), but more generally where this format is concerned. Of course, an introduction needs to set forth the tasks and relevant phenomena to be addressed in the journal. And we should be responsible for crafting it. Moreover, together with a group of diverse scholars, many of them strongly connected to the Research Committee 17 “Sociology of Organizations” of the International Sociological Association (ISA RC 17), we already defined a scope for the Journal of Organizational Sociology (JOSO). At the same time, we see a strong need to resist defining narrowly what a sociology of organization supposedly is, a question that immediately comes up when reading JOSO’s title. What we certainly can say is that, for us, organizational sociology entails taking organization seriously as a specific phenomenon or as a specific concept that is more than just a mere synonym for social order in general. Apart from that though, we will not provide a definition, because we want to embrace the different definitions that are out there and see such definitions rather as reflecting something that is in flux and continually recreated. Therefore, you, the (future) contributors to JOSO, are at the center of defining this sub-field of sociology in rather practical terms! In recent years, there has been much discussion about the state and identity of “organizational sociology”, involving ourselves, ISA RC 17, and many other colleagues (Besio, du Gay, and Serrano Velarde 2020; Godwyn 2022; Gorman 2014;","PeriodicalId":445948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Sociology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing this introductory essay for the journal on which we have worked for so many years entails some problems, not just emotionally (because we worked so hard on it), but more generally where this format is concerned. Of course, an introduction needs to set forth the tasks and relevant phenomena to be addressed in the journal. And we should be responsible for crafting it. Moreover, together with a group of diverse scholars, many of them strongly connected to the Research Committee 17 “Sociology of Organizations” of the International Sociological Association (ISA RC 17), we already defined a scope for the Journal of Organizational Sociology (JOSO). At the same time, we see a strong need to resist defining narrowly what a sociology of organization supposedly is, a question that immediately comes up when reading JOSO’s title. What we certainly can say is that, for us, organizational sociology entails taking organization seriously as a specific phenomenon or as a specific concept that is more than just a mere synonym for social order in general. Apart from that though, we will not provide a definition, because we want to embrace the different definitions that are out there and see such definitions rather as reflecting something that is in flux and continually recreated. Therefore, you, the (future) contributors to JOSO, are at the center of defining this sub-field of sociology in rather practical terms! In recent years, there has been much discussion about the state and identity of “organizational sociology”, involving ourselves, ISA RC 17, and many other colleagues (Besio, du Gay, and Serrano Velarde 2020; Godwyn 2022; Gorman 2014;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讨论组织在社会中、为社会服务以及在整个社会中所扮演的角色的平台
为我们工作了这么多年的杂志写这篇介绍性的文章需要一些问题,不仅仅是情感上的问题(因为我们为此付出了很大的努力),而且更普遍的是这种格式。当然,导言部分需要阐述本刊要处理的任务和相关现象。我们应该负责制定它。此外,与一群不同的学者一起,他们中的许多人与国际社会学协会(ISA RC 17)的17“组织社会学”研究委员会有密切的联系,我们已经为《组织社会学杂志》(JOSO)定义了一个范围。与此同时,我们看到强烈需要抵制狭隘地定义组织社会学应该是什么,这个问题在阅读JOSO的标题时立即出现。我们可以肯定的是,对我们来说,组织社会学要求我们认真地把组织看作一种特殊的现象,或者是一种特殊的概念,而不仅仅是社会秩序的同义词。除此之外,我们不会给出一个定义,因为我们想要接受不同的定义,而不是把这些定义看作是不断变化和不断重新创造的东西。因此,你,JOSO的(未来)贡献者,是在相当实际的术语中定义社会学的这个子领域的中心!近年来,有很多关于“组织社会学”的状态和身份的讨论,涉及我们自己,ISA RC 17,以及许多其他同事(Besio, du Gay, and Serrano Velarde 2020;Godwyn 2022;戈尔曼2014;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensing that Something is Wrong: On the Role of Senses in Sensemaking in Frontline Safety Work Social Systems of Flexible Production: Organizational Conditions for the Resurgence of Craft Learning from Surprising Observations in Management – Longitudinal Accounts Organization Studies and the Legal Person Overcoming Strong–Weak Dualisms in Process Organization Studies via Three Theory-Methodology Hybrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1