Teaching Literature

Spoke Wintersparv
{"title":"Teaching Literature","authors":"Spoke Wintersparv","doi":"10.54807/kp.v29.16057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How literature studies are perceived varies depending on viewer, given prerequisites, and prevailing circumstances. Pre-service teachers approach literature studies from a theoretical understanding, with ideal conditions and rooted in curricular stipulations. The educational researcher’s perspective is rather rooted in conceptual constructions about how readers approach texts. It is between these two perspectives that Swedish L1 teachers combine curricular requisites with pedagogical ideas while considering factors beyond the teaching context. What from a researcher’s viewpoint seems appropriate and necessary may be difficult to operationalize. The comparison between the three perspectives shows a discrepancy in how literature studies may be perceived. These differences do not, however, need to be an impediment, but knowledge of the differences in possibilities and limitations may contribute to further understanding. Awareness about the discrepancy, thus, may be advantageous both to how literature studies are viewed and to the transition from theory to practice. By letting the different perspectives draw nearer to each other, research findings can be made more relevant to both pre-service and in-service teachers. By reducing the distance between the different entities, teachers could more easily relate to the reality that is described as theirs, and research about literature studies would appear more relevant.","PeriodicalId":141494,"journal":{"name":"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v29.16057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How literature studies are perceived varies depending on viewer, given prerequisites, and prevailing circumstances. Pre-service teachers approach literature studies from a theoretical understanding, with ideal conditions and rooted in curricular stipulations. The educational researcher’s perspective is rather rooted in conceptual constructions about how readers approach texts. It is between these two perspectives that Swedish L1 teachers combine curricular requisites with pedagogical ideas while considering factors beyond the teaching context. What from a researcher’s viewpoint seems appropriate and necessary may be difficult to operationalize. The comparison between the three perspectives shows a discrepancy in how literature studies may be perceived. These differences do not, however, need to be an impediment, but knowledge of the differences in possibilities and limitations may contribute to further understanding. Awareness about the discrepancy, thus, may be advantageous both to how literature studies are viewed and to the transition from theory to practice. By letting the different perspectives draw nearer to each other, research findings can be made more relevant to both pre-service and in-service teachers. By reducing the distance between the different entities, teachers could more easily relate to the reality that is described as theirs, and research about literature studies would appear more relevant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学文献
文学研究如何被感知取决于观众、给定的先决条件和当时的环境。职前教师从理论的角度出发,以理想的条件和课程的规定为基础进行文学研究。教育研究者的观点根植于关于读者如何接近文本的概念建构。正是在这两种观点之间,瑞典语母语教师将课程要求与教学理念结合起来,同时考虑教学情境之外的因素。从研究人员的角度来看,似乎是适当和必要的,但可能很难实施。这三种观点的比较表明,人们对文学研究的看法存在差异。然而,这些差异不一定是障碍,但了解可能性和局限性的差异可能有助于进一步了解。因此,意识到这种差异,可能有利于如何看待文学研究,也有利于从理论到实践的过渡。通过让不同的观点彼此接近,研究结果可以使职前和在职教师更相关。通过减少不同实体之间的距离,教师可以更容易地与被描述为他们的现实联系起来,而关于文学研究的研究也会显得更相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Täta beskrivningar i etnografiskt skrivande Språkrikedom skapar ett mångsidigt identitetsspektrum Konsten att ignorera och välja bort ”En sån här flummig typ, det har jag då aldrig tänkt att jag skulle bli” Medhårs och mothårs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1