The use of pediatric fall risk assessment tool in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A prospective study

N. Yalçın, M. Göktaş, E. Gümüş
{"title":"The use of pediatric fall risk assessment tool in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A prospective study","authors":"N. Yalçın, M. Göktaş, E. Gümüş","doi":"10.17941/agd.1346736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the fall risk with Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale and determine related risk factors in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted in a large tertiary pediatric hospital. Patients' demographics, type of endoscopy, duration of endoscopic procedures, type of procedural sedation, doses of administered drugs during anesthesia, and post-procedure Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale scores were collected. Post-hoc and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify within-group differences and independent predictors of patient outcomes. Results: One hundred ninety-two pediatric patients (54.2% female) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 11.16 (5.32) years were admitted for a diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. During procedures, the most commonly administered sedatives were midazolam (98.9%), propofol (96.9%), fentanyl (63.0%), and ketamine (34.9%). According to the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale, 148 (77.1%) patients had a high risk for falls. No falls after endoscopic procedures was observed in the patients. When the predictive factors determining being at high-risk for falls were examined, the simultaneous application of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy under the same procedural sedation increases the risk of being high-risk 5.2 times compared to the performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy alone (p = 0.047). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the use of Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale to predict falls in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with procedural sedation. Although 77.1% of the patients were found to be at high risk for falls, there was no fall event after the endoscopic procedures due to precautionary measures. Our results indicate that pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation are at increased risk of falling and preventive measures should be taken.","PeriodicalId":118745,"journal":{"name":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.1346736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the fall risk with Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale and determine related risk factors in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted in a large tertiary pediatric hospital. Patients' demographics, type of endoscopy, duration of endoscopic procedures, type of procedural sedation, doses of administered drugs during anesthesia, and post-procedure Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale scores were collected. Post-hoc and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify within-group differences and independent predictors of patient outcomes. Results: One hundred ninety-two pediatric patients (54.2% female) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 11.16 (5.32) years were admitted for a diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. During procedures, the most commonly administered sedatives were midazolam (98.9%), propofol (96.9%), fentanyl (63.0%), and ketamine (34.9%). According to the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale, 148 (77.1%) patients had a high risk for falls. No falls after endoscopic procedures was observed in the patients. When the predictive factors determining being at high-risk for falls were examined, the simultaneous application of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy under the same procedural sedation increases the risk of being high-risk 5.2 times compared to the performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy alone (p = 0.047). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the use of Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale to predict falls in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with procedural sedation. Although 77.1% of the patients were found to be at high risk for falls, there was no fall event after the endoscopic procedures due to precautionary measures. Our results indicate that pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation are at increased risk of falling and preventive measures should be taken.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在胃肠内镜手术中使用儿童跌倒风险评估工具:一项前瞻性研究
背景与目的:本研究的目的是利用Humpty Dumpty跌倒量表评估儿童胃肠内镜检查患者的跌倒风险,并确定相关危险因素。材料与方法:在某大型三级儿科医院进行前瞻性描述性研究。收集患者的人口统计资料、内镜检查类型、内镜手术持续时间、手术镇静类型、麻醉期间给药剂量和手术后跌倒量表评分。进行事后和逻辑回归分析,以确定组内差异和患者预后的独立预测因素。结果:192例儿童患者(54.2%为女性)接受了胃肠内镜诊断,平均(标准差)年龄为11.16(5.32)岁。在手术过程中,最常用的镇静剂是咪达唑仑(98.9%)、异丙酚(96.9%)、芬太尼(63.0%)和氯胺酮(34.9%)。根据Humpty Dumpty跌倒量表,148例(77.1%)患者有跌倒的高风险。内窥镜手术后未观察到患者跌倒。当检查判定跌倒高危的预测因素时,在相同的手术镇静下同时进行食管胃十二指肠镜和结肠镜检查,其发生跌倒的风险是单独进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查的5.2倍(p = 0.047)。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个评估使用Humpty Dumpty跌倒量表来预测接受胃肠内窥镜检查并应用程序镇静的儿科患者跌倒的研究。虽然77.1%的患者被发现有跌倒的高风险,但由于采取了预防措施,内镜手术后没有发生跌倒事件。我们的研究结果表明,镇静下接受胃肠内镜检查的儿童患者摔倒的风险增加,应采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of large superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia Donör graft hepatosteatozunun yetişkin canlı donör karaciğer nakli alıcılarında ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlara etkisi Dieulafoy lezyonunda endoskopik tedavilerin zorlu seçimi İnflamatuvar barsak hastalığında değişmeyen soru: İmmünmodülatör tedavi ne kadar güvenli? Mıknatıs ile neo-anastomoz: Mıknatısı nasıl itmeli?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1