Will There Rather Be Nothing Than Something?

A. Bielik-Robson
{"title":"Will There Rather Be Nothing Than Something?","authors":"A. Bielik-Robson","doi":"10.35757/civ.2021.29.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this essay is to put Ernst Bloch’s philosophy to a test suggested by Hans Blumenberg in The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. According to Blumenberg, modernity constitutes the second, successful, attempt at overcoming Gnosticism, after the first attempt, undertaken by Christianity, had failed. However – Blumenberg argues – it  was not modern philosophy, but only science which had managed to escape Gnosticism’s ontological trap of viewing the world as an illusion bordering on nothing.","PeriodicalId":350409,"journal":{"name":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/civ.2021.29.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to put Ernst Bloch’s philosophy to a test suggested by Hans Blumenberg in The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. According to Blumenberg, modernity constitutes the second, successful, attempt at overcoming Gnosticism, after the first attempt, undertaken by Christianity, had failed. However – Blumenberg argues – it  was not modern philosophy, but only science which had managed to escape Gnosticism’s ontological trap of viewing the world as an illusion bordering on nothing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宁愿什么都没有,也要有吗?
本文的目的是对汉斯·布鲁门伯格在《现代的合法性》一书中提出的恩斯特·布洛赫的哲学进行检验。根据Blumenberg,现代性构成了第二次,成功的,试图克服诺斯替主义,在第一次尝试之后,由基督教承担,失败了。然而,布卢门伯格认为,这不是现代哲学,而是科学,它成功地摆脱了诺斯替主义的本体论陷阱,即把世界看作是一种接近虚无的幻觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narracja filozoficzna a koncepcje postwzrostowe Uatlantydzenie opowieści jako strategia wyjścia z realizmu kapitalistycznego Skażenie jako współpraca, przeł. A. Brylska, M. Rogowska-Stangret Wszystkie jutra: Trwająca miliard lat kronika niezliczonych gatunków i różnorakich losów człowieka (fragmenty), przeł. M. Rzepa Ekosocjalizm: między ruchem społecznym a teorią marksowską
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1