Learners'Motivation Types in the Smart Instruction of English for Specific Purposes

I. Šimonová, Ludmila Faltýnková, K. Kostolányová
{"title":"Learners'Motivation Types in the Smart Instruction of English for Specific Purposes","authors":"I. Šimonová, Ludmila Faltýnková, K. Kostolányová","doi":"10.1109/CiSt49399.2021.9357235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper introduces results of research in which potential increase in learner's knowledge is considered from the view of four motivation types (Accurators, Coordinators, Directors, Explorers) within the process of smart instruction applied at two topics (Career Development, Healthy Living) of the English for Specific Purposes course. The main research objective is to find out whether learners of all motivation types can succeed in this process. Totally, 119 students, prospective teachers from the Faculty of Education and Faculty of Science, participated in the research. The SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) model was applied within the smart instruction using smart devices to approach electronic sources and smart methods towards acquiring the learning content. The smart instruction was conducted for 12 weeks (one semester). Two hypotheses were set, and the quasi-experiment and ex-post-facto method were applied. Data referring to learners' motivation types were collected through the standardized Motivation Type Inventory (MTI) by Plaminek. The increase in learners' knowledge was calculated as the difference between entrance and final didactic tests scores. The results did not show statistically significant difference between single motivation types in the topic of Career Development. However, in Healthy Living, the difference was discovered in the group of Coordinators compared to other three types.","PeriodicalId":253233,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CiSt49399.2021.9357235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper introduces results of research in which potential increase in learner's knowledge is considered from the view of four motivation types (Accurators, Coordinators, Directors, Explorers) within the process of smart instruction applied at two topics (Career Development, Healthy Living) of the English for Specific Purposes course. The main research objective is to find out whether learners of all motivation types can succeed in this process. Totally, 119 students, prospective teachers from the Faculty of Education and Faculty of Science, participated in the research. The SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) model was applied within the smart instruction using smart devices to approach electronic sources and smart methods towards acquiring the learning content. The smart instruction was conducted for 12 weeks (one semester). Two hypotheses were set, and the quasi-experiment and ex-post-facto method were applied. Data referring to learners' motivation types were collected through the standardized Motivation Type Inventory (MTI) by Plaminek. The increase in learners' knowledge was calculated as the difference between entrance and final didactic tests scores. The results did not show statistically significant difference between single motivation types in the topic of Career Development. However, in Healthy Living, the difference was discovered in the group of Coordinators compared to other three types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专用英语智能教学中学习者的动机类型
本文介绍了从四种动机类型(准确者、协调者、指导者、探索者)的角度考虑学习者知识潜在增长的研究结果,这些动机类型应用于特殊用途英语课程的两个主题(职业发展、健康生活)的智能教学过程中。研究的主要目的是找出所有动机类型的学习者是否都能在这一过程中取得成功。共有119名来自教育学院和理学院的准教师参与了研究。在智能教学中应用SAMR(替代、增强、修改、重新定义)模型,使用智能设备接近电子源和智能方法获取学习内容。智能教学为期12周(1学期)。设置两个假设,采用准实验法和事后检验法。通过Plaminek的标准化动机类型量表(MTI)收集学习者的动机类型数据。学习者知识的增长是通过入学和期末教学考试成绩之间的差异来计算的。结果显示,在职业发展主题中,单一动机类型之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,在健康生活中,与其他三种类型相比,协调员组发现了差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Hybrid CNN-CRF Inference Models for 3D Mesh Segmentation An Effective Packet Loss Recovery Scheme Using a Cache Server in IPTV Multicast Service TermInteract: An Online Tool for Terminologists Aimed at Providing Terminology Quality Metrics Proposing solutions with an application server implementing telephony services in the IMS network Corpus and Baseline Model for Domain-Specific Entity Recognition in German
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1