PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

Mul Iadi
{"title":"PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR","authors":"Mul Iadi","doi":"10.30821/ansiru.v3i2.5847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in AkidahAkhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approacheswith students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences inlearning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory andkinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approachand student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of thisstudy are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into twoclasses with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected forthe experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with thenumber of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextualapproach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of datacollection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The techniqueby analysis of variance (Anava) at \"α\" = 0.05. The results of this study are:(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10> Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learningoutcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 > Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is aninteraction between learning strategies and learning styles towardslearning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16>Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showeda significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by thescientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as studentlearning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.","PeriodicalId":126913,"journal":{"name":"ANSIRU PAI : Pengembangan Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANSIRU PAI : Pengembangan Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30821/ansiru.v3i2.5847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in AkidahAkhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approacheswith students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences inlearning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory andkinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approachand student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of thisstudy are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into twoclasses with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected forthe experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with thenumber of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextualapproach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of datacollection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The techniqueby analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10> Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learningoutcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 > Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is aninteraction between learning strategies and learning styles towardslearning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16>Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showeda significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by thescientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as studentlearning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的在于找出:(1)科学教学法学生与情境教学法学生在AkidahAkhlak学习成果上的差异,(2)视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的AkidahAkhlak学生在学习成果上的差异,以及(3)科学教学法和学生学习风格对AkidahAkhlak学习成果的影响。本研究方法为准实验,研究对象为七(七)班学生。采用整群随机抽样技术将样本分为两个班级,在本例中,采用科学方法的实验班为VIIa班,学生人数为31人,而采用情境方法的控制班为VIId班,学生人数为34人。数据收集的工具是学习成果的问卷调查和测试。方差分析(Anava),“α”= 0.05。本研究结果显示:(1)科学方法教学的学生学习成果(= 33.5)高于情境方法教学的学生学习成果(= 28,7),Fcount = 68,10> Ftable = 3.988;(2)视觉学习风格的学生学习成果(= 34.21)高于动觉学习风格(= 28.38)和听觉学习风格(= 27.69),Fcount = 79,32 > Ftable = 3.988。(3)学习策略和学习风格对学习结果存在交互作用,统计计算已知F count = 30,16>Ftable = 3.988。使用Scheffe测试的进一步测试计算也表明,科学方法和情境方法(CTL)教授的学生学习成果以及视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格的学生学习成果之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KONSEP PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DALAM PRESPEKTIF AL-QUR’AN DAN SURAH QAF IMPLEMENTASI INSTRUMEN EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN DI TK RIZKY ANANDA UPAYA PENINGKATAN PROFESIONALISME GURU PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DI SD MUHAMMADIYAH PURWODININGRATAN YOGYAKARTA PENERAPAN GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN SITUASIONAL DALAM RANGKA MENINGKATKAN EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN DI SDN KERTAMULYA 3 PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MELALUI METODE MIND MAPPING PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM (PAI) DI SMP ISLAM KARAWANG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1