Unfolding the dimensionality structure of social networks in ideological embeddings

P. Morales, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Gabriel Muñoz Zolotoochin
{"title":"Unfolding the dimensionality structure of social networks in ideological embeddings","authors":"P. Morales, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Gabriel Muñoz Zolotoochin","doi":"10.1145/3487351.3489441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, public opinion on different issues of public debate has been studied through polls and surveys. Recent advancements in network ideological scaling methods, however, have shown that digital behavioral traces in social media platforms can be used to mine opinions at a massive scale. This has yet to be shown to work beyond one-dimensional opinion scales, which are best suited for two-party systems and binary social divides such as those observed in the US. In this article, we use multidimensional ideological scaling for coupled with referential attitudinal data for some nodes. We show that opinions can be mined in a multitude of issues: from social networks, embedding them in ideological spaces where dimensions stand for indicators of positive and negative opinions, towards issues of public debate. This method does not require text analysis and is thus language independent. We illustrate this approach on the Twitter follower network of French users leveraging political survey data.","PeriodicalId":320904,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3487351.3489441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Traditionally, public opinion on different issues of public debate has been studied through polls and surveys. Recent advancements in network ideological scaling methods, however, have shown that digital behavioral traces in social media platforms can be used to mine opinions at a massive scale. This has yet to be shown to work beyond one-dimensional opinion scales, which are best suited for two-party systems and binary social divides such as those observed in the US. In this article, we use multidimensional ideological scaling for coupled with referential attitudinal data for some nodes. We show that opinions can be mined in a multitude of issues: from social networks, embedding them in ideological spaces where dimensions stand for indicators of positive and negative opinions, towards issues of public debate. This method does not require text analysis and is thus language independent. We illustrate this approach on the Twitter follower network of French users leveraging political survey data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识形态嵌入中社会网络维度结构的揭示
传统上,公众对公共辩论的不同问题的意见是通过民意调查和调查来研究的。然而,网络意识形态扩展方法的最新进展表明,社交媒体平台上的数字行为痕迹可以用来大规模地挖掘意见。目前还没有证据表明,这种方法在一维意见量表之外也能发挥作用,这种量表最适合于两党制度和二元社会划分,比如在美国观察到的情况。在本文中,我们使用多维意识形态尺度来耦合一些节点的参考态度数据。我们表明,意见可以从许多问题中挖掘:从社交网络,将它们嵌入意识形态空间,其中维度代表积极和消极意见的指标,到公共辩论的问题。这种方法不需要文本分析,因此与语言无关。我们利用政治调查数据在法国用户的Twitter追随者网络上说明了这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting COVID-19 with AI techniques: current research and future directions Predictions of drug metabolism pathways through CYP 3A4 enzyme by analysing drug-target interactions network graph An insight into network structure measures and number of driver nodes Temporal dynamics of posts and user engagement of influencers on Facebook and Instagram Vibe check: social resonance learning for enhanced recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1