Different perspectives of doctors and nurses about the continuation of usage of some of the protection measures after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic

M. Oțelea, D. Mates, A. Rascu
{"title":"Different perspectives of doctors and nurses about the continuation of usage of some of the protection measures after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"M. Oțelea, D. Mates, A. Rascu","doi":"10.2478/rjom-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current pandemic pointed toward a revision of the protection measures against infectious diseases. For any given new pathogen against which human species showed no immunity, isolation and personal protection equipment proved to reduce disease transmission. In medical settings, when there is inevitable contact with infected patients, these preventive measures have undoubtedly change the process of care delivery. The study aims to investigate the opinion of the healthcare workers about the utilization of the personal protective equipment after the pandemic stops. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey about changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the healthcare workers, the survey also included several questions related to personal protective equipment. A total of 512 responders, doctors, and nurses answered to the survey. We performed comparisons between these two categories of personnel using the χ test. Overall, the results show that doctors are keener to follow the recommendations for the personal protective equipment in the future; there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) for the usage of gloves and masks while examining febrile patients, and for the handwashing after the examination of each patient. The type of service (outpatient or inpatient procedures) and direct contact with a COVID-19 patient were other factors to modulate the responses regarding using personal protective equipment in the future. The fact that 14.06% of the responders did not consider it necessary to wash hands after examining each patient underlines the urgent need for safety education in all healthcare workers and nurses.","PeriodicalId":399083,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjom-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The current pandemic pointed toward a revision of the protection measures against infectious diseases. For any given new pathogen against which human species showed no immunity, isolation and personal protection equipment proved to reduce disease transmission. In medical settings, when there is inevitable contact with infected patients, these preventive measures have undoubtedly change the process of care delivery. The study aims to investigate the opinion of the healthcare workers about the utilization of the personal protective equipment after the pandemic stops. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey about changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the healthcare workers, the survey also included several questions related to personal protective equipment. A total of 512 responders, doctors, and nurses answered to the survey. We performed comparisons between these two categories of personnel using the χ test. Overall, the results show that doctors are keener to follow the recommendations for the personal protective equipment in the future; there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) for the usage of gloves and masks while examining febrile patients, and for the handwashing after the examination of each patient. The type of service (outpatient or inpatient procedures) and direct contact with a COVID-19 patient were other factors to modulate the responses regarding using personal protective equipment in the future. The fact that 14.06% of the responders did not consider it necessary to wash hands after examining each patient underlines the urgent need for safety education in all healthcare workers and nurses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生和护士对COVID-19大流行结束后继续使用某些保护措施的不同看法
当前的大流行要求对传染病防护措施进行修订。对于任何人类没有免疫力的新病原体,隔离和个人防护设备被证明可以减少疾病传播。在医疗环境中,当不可避免地与受感染患者接触时,这些预防措施无疑改变了提供护理的过程。本研究旨在调查疫情结束后医护人员对个人防护装备使用情况的看法。为此,我们对新冠肺炎疫情相关变化进行了在线调查。对于医护人员,调查还包括几个与个人防护装备有关的问题。共有512名应答者、医生和护士回答了调查。我们使用χ检验对这两类人员进行比较。总体而言,结果表明,医生在未来更愿意遵循个人防护装备的建议;发热患者检查时手套和口罩的使用情况和每个患者检查后的洗手情况差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。服务类型(门诊或住院程序)和与COVID-19患者的直接接触是影响未来使用个人防护装备反应的其他因素。14.06%的应答者认为在检查每个病人后没有必要洗手,这一事实强调了对所有医护人员和护士进行安全教育的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retraction note: Information about article’s retraction Neurological complications in infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus: Parkinson’s disease and the impact on professional reintegration - case study An unexpected effect of teleworking: acute clinical manifestations of a hypersensitivity pneumonitis to home parrots Occupational exposure and sick leave in a local food industry company Osteoarthritis – a multidiciplinary approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1