Comparison of the effect of elastic and viscoelastic modeling of PCBs on the assessment of board level reliability

Abel Misrak, Avinash Anaskure, A. Sakib, Unique Rahangdale, A. Lohia, D. Agonafer
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of elastic and viscoelastic modeling of PCBs on the assessment of board level reliability","authors":"Abel Misrak, Avinash Anaskure, A. Sakib, Unique Rahangdale, A. Lohia, D. Agonafer","doi":"10.1109/ITHERM.2017.7992612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of board level solder joint reliability during thermal cycling is very important for electronic packages. During thermal cycling, the mismatch in Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) between the materials used in the package induces stress on the solder interconnects and results in deformation and stresses. Finite element tools are widely used for rapid design optimization and also for understanding board level reliability issues. Lumped board modeling approach, explicit geometry approach, and ECAD approach are the three widely used approaches for creating models for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs). Mapping the metal fraction in each layer from ECAD data usually results in highly accurate and fast solutions. However, in situations where the ECAD data is not available the lump approach is employed as explicit geometry approach requires very large mesh size and very long solution times. In the lump approach, orthotropic elastic material properties are assigned to PCBs. However, for temperatures near and beyond the glass transition temperature, materials behave in a viscoelastic manner. In which case, considering viscoelastic properties would result in a more accurate representation than the orthotropic elastic lump model. In this paper, we present a comparative study on the orthotropic linear elastic and viscoelastic modeling of PCBs and how it affects the board level reliability of Wafer Chip Scale Package (WCSP) under thermal cycling. The viscoelastic material properties of PCBs are characterized using Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA). The frequency and temperature dependent complex moduli are obtained from the DMA. The obtained results are used to model the PCBs as viscoelastic materials on ANSYS 17.2. Thermal cycling is performed in ANSYS and the results obtained are compared to those obtained from the elastic modeling of PCBs.","PeriodicalId":387542,"journal":{"name":"2017 16th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 16th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHERM.2017.7992612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The assessment of board level solder joint reliability during thermal cycling is very important for electronic packages. During thermal cycling, the mismatch in Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) between the materials used in the package induces stress on the solder interconnects and results in deformation and stresses. Finite element tools are widely used for rapid design optimization and also for understanding board level reliability issues. Lumped board modeling approach, explicit geometry approach, and ECAD approach are the three widely used approaches for creating models for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs). Mapping the metal fraction in each layer from ECAD data usually results in highly accurate and fast solutions. However, in situations where the ECAD data is not available the lump approach is employed as explicit geometry approach requires very large mesh size and very long solution times. In the lump approach, orthotropic elastic material properties are assigned to PCBs. However, for temperatures near and beyond the glass transition temperature, materials behave in a viscoelastic manner. In which case, considering viscoelastic properties would result in a more accurate representation than the orthotropic elastic lump model. In this paper, we present a comparative study on the orthotropic linear elastic and viscoelastic modeling of PCBs and how it affects the board level reliability of Wafer Chip Scale Package (WCSP) under thermal cycling. The viscoelastic material properties of PCBs are characterized using Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA). The frequency and temperature dependent complex moduli are obtained from the DMA. The obtained results are used to model the PCBs as viscoelastic materials on ANSYS 17.2. Thermal cycling is performed in ANSYS and the results obtained are compared to those obtained from the elastic modeling of PCBs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pcb板级可靠性评估中弹性与粘弹性建模效果的比较
板级焊点在热循环过程中的可靠性评估对电子封装非常重要。在热循环过程中,封装中使用的材料之间的热膨胀系数(CTE)的不匹配会在焊料互连上产生应力,并导致变形和应力。有限元工具广泛用于快速设计优化和理解板级可靠性问题。集总板建模方法、显式几何建模方法和ECAD建模方法是三种广泛使用的印刷电路板(pcb)建模方法。利用ECAD数据绘制每一层的金属成分图,通常可以获得高度准确和快速的解决方案。然而,在没有ECAD数据的情况下,由于显式几何方法需要非常大的网格尺寸和非常长的求解时间,因此采用块法。在块状方法中,将正交各向异性弹性材料特性分配给pcb。然而,对于接近或超过玻璃化转变温度的温度,材料表现为粘弹性方式。在这种情况下,考虑粘弹性特性将导致比正交各向异性弹性块模型更准确的表示。本文对pcb的正交各向异性线弹性和粘弹性建模进行了比较研究,并分析了热循环下其对WCSP板级可靠性的影响。采用动态力学分析仪(DMA)对pcb的粘弹性材料性能进行了表征。频率和温度相关的复模量由DMA得到。利用所得结果在ANSYS 17.2上对pcb板进行粘弹性建模。在ANSYS中进行了热循环,并与pcb的弹性建模结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Degradation characterization of thermal interface greases Gravity effects in microgap flow boiling Effect of electrode properties on performance of miniaturized vanadium redox flow battery Two-phase liquid cooling system for electronics, part 1: Pump-driven loop Development of algorithms for real-time estimation of smartphone surface temperature using embedded processor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1