A prospective randomized clinical study comparing the alignment efficiency of four different ligation methods

Soumya N.B, Manjusha Kk, A. Bn, Aparna Ma, Reyas Y. Rasool
{"title":"A prospective randomized clinical study comparing the alignment efficiency of four different ligation methods","authors":"Soumya N.B, Manjusha Kk, A. Bn, Aparna Ma, Reyas Y. Rasool","doi":"10.18231/j.ijodr.2023.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct a prospective randomized study comparing the efficiency of four different ligation systems (ELL,SSL,LL,PSL) over the duration of mandibular crowding alleviation.The study was conducted in Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Neyyattinkara, Trivandrum. The present study evaluated the variations in alignment efficiency of four different ligation systems over the duration of mandibular crowding alleviation in patients during mandibular crowding alleviation. Eighty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and equally divided into four groups- Elastomeric ligation (ELL), Stainless steel Ligation (SSL)- active and passive , Leone slide Ligatures (LL).: The mean treatment time for alignment for passive self ligating group (102 days) followed by leone group (128 days), stainless steel (176 days) and elastomeric (224 days) group. Thus the study showed no significant difference in the clinical performance between coventional, self ligating, while PSL performed significantly superior to other groups. From the above equation, during initial phase of orthodontic treatment.self-ligating brackets were more efficient than conventional brackets in anterior alignment, passive space closure, and mandibular incisal inclination.","PeriodicalId":269485,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2023.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To conduct a prospective randomized study comparing the efficiency of four different ligation systems (ELL,SSL,LL,PSL) over the duration of mandibular crowding alleviation.The study was conducted in Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Neyyattinkara, Trivandrum. The present study evaluated the variations in alignment efficiency of four different ligation systems over the duration of mandibular crowding alleviation in patients during mandibular crowding alleviation. Eighty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and equally divided into four groups- Elastomeric ligation (ELL), Stainless steel Ligation (SSL)- active and passive , Leone slide Ligatures (LL).: The mean treatment time for alignment for passive self ligating group (102 days) followed by leone group (128 days), stainless steel (176 days) and elastomeric (224 days) group. Thus the study showed no significant difference in the clinical performance between coventional, self ligating, while PSL performed significantly superior to other groups. From the above equation, during initial phase of orthodontic treatment.self-ligating brackets were more efficient than conventional brackets in anterior alignment, passive space closure, and mandibular incisal inclination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性随机临床研究,比较四种不同结扎方法的对准效率
进行一项前瞻性随机研究,比较四种不同结扎系统(ELL,SSL,LL,PSL)在缓解下颌拥挤持续时间内的效率。该研究在Trivandrum neyattinkara Noorul Islam牙科科学学院正畸和牙面矫形科进行。本研究评估了四种不同结扎系统在缓解患者下颌拥挤期间对线效率的变化。选择80例符合纳入标准的患者,平均分为四组:弹性结扎(ELL),不锈钢结扎(SSL)-主动和被动,Leone滑动结扎(LL)。被动自结扎组平均矫直时间为102天,其次为leone组(128天)、不锈钢组(176天)和弹性组(224天)。因此,本研究显示常规结扎与自结扎在临床表现上无显著差异,而PSL在临床表现上明显优于其他组。由上式可知,在正畸治疗初始阶段。自结扎托槽在前牙对准、被动间隙闭合和下颌切牙倾斜方面比传统托槽更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of skeletal Class III malocclusion using two-phase therapy in young patient - A case report CBCT: The third eye in orthodontics Comparison between two types of grids for placement of mini-screw implant in posterior maxillary segment Evaluation of surface-modified orthodontic brackets with silver nanoparticles and its influence on bacterial inhibition – An in vitro study Deep bite -An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1