{"title":"Sanctions and Strategies of Control","authors":"Matthew H. Birkhold","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198831976.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 examines the ways in which authors, publishers, and critics punished violations of the customary norms that governed the production and dissemination of fan fiction in eighteenth-century Germany. Sanctions included official complaints, advertisements, negative reviews, and literary and personal attacks—norms that scholars refer to as public shaming or truthful negative gossip. This chapter then examines the effectiveness of these mechanisms and their wider fallout. In some instances the sanctions motivated third parties, like the famous engraver Chodowiecki, to refuse to deal with perpetrator authors. In other cases, the sanctions inspired the creation of memorable texts, like Goethe’s ribald poem, “Nicolai at Werther’s Grave.” Authors’ critical notes in prefaces, footnotes, and the texts themselves were among the most common form of sanction. Traces of these enforcement mechanisms linger in the texts we read today, long after the censured fan fiction has disappeared from our collective memory. This chapter concludes by analyzing additional strategies authors used to maintain exclusive control over the characters they invented, offering a new explanation for familiar practices in the book trade, such as the practice of announcing the final volume of a novel and soliciting reader feedback for ongoing works.","PeriodicalId":197333,"journal":{"name":"Characters Before Copyright","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Characters Before Copyright","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198831976.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter 4 examines the ways in which authors, publishers, and critics punished violations of the customary norms that governed the production and dissemination of fan fiction in eighteenth-century Germany. Sanctions included official complaints, advertisements, negative reviews, and literary and personal attacks—norms that scholars refer to as public shaming or truthful negative gossip. This chapter then examines the effectiveness of these mechanisms and their wider fallout. In some instances the sanctions motivated third parties, like the famous engraver Chodowiecki, to refuse to deal with perpetrator authors. In other cases, the sanctions inspired the creation of memorable texts, like Goethe’s ribald poem, “Nicolai at Werther’s Grave.” Authors’ critical notes in prefaces, footnotes, and the texts themselves were among the most common form of sanction. Traces of these enforcement mechanisms linger in the texts we read today, long after the censured fan fiction has disappeared from our collective memory. This chapter concludes by analyzing additional strategies authors used to maintain exclusive control over the characters they invented, offering a new explanation for familiar practices in the book trade, such as the practice of announcing the final volume of a novel and soliciting reader feedback for ongoing works.
第四章考察了在18世纪的德国,作家、出版商和评论家是如何惩罚违反同人小说创作和传播惯例的行为的。制裁包括官方投诉、广告、负面评论、文学和人身攻击——学者们称之为公开羞辱或真实的负面八卦。本章随后探讨了这些机制的有效性及其更广泛的影响。在某些情况下,制裁促使第三方,如著名的雕刻家Chodowiecki,拒绝与犯罪作者打交道。在其他情况下,制裁激发了令人难忘的文本的创作,比如歌德的淫秽诗《维特墓前的尼古拉》(Nicolai at Werther 's Grave)。作者在前言,脚注和文本本身的批评注释是最常见的认可形式之一。这些强制机制的痕迹在我们今天读到的文本中仍然存在,尽管那些受到谴责的同人小说已经从我们的集体记忆中消失了很久。本章最后分析了作者用来保持对他们所创造的人物的独家控制权的其他策略,为图书贸易中常见的做法提供了新的解释,例如宣布小说的最后一卷和征求读者对正在进行的作品的反馈的做法。