Learning from East to West and West to east

Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park
{"title":"Learning from East to West and West to east","authors":"Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park","doi":"10.1108/09544780610659961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Parallel with increasing awareness of importance in learning during the last few decades, numerous theorists from various disciplines have tried to shape ideas concerning learning seen from their perspectives. One negative consequence of these efforts has been observed as increased confusion and disputes among the theorists as well as practitioners due to “lacking of common ground” in their search on learning. Hence, the aim of this paper is to explore some critical aspects of learning, among others, root thinking, meaning of learning, nature, processes and outcomes of learning in order to identify possible common ground(s) in between various schools of thought. Design/methodology/approach – Through a literature survey the characteristics of learning in terms of the processes, the nature and the outcomes of learning are investigated. Besides the chosen contemporary literature on learning, ideas and philosophies of John Dewey (1859-1952) and Confucius (551-479, BC) have been explored in order to identify possible root thinking in the West and in the East. Findings – It is found that not much new knowledge has been accumulated since Confucius and despite multiple schools of thought in current research, the majority of western theorists base their ideas on Dewey's thinking. The meta learning wheel has been suggested to be a common ground for learning. Originality/value – The originalities of this paper are: both contemporary as well as classic literatures in learning are investigated.","PeriodicalId":412605,"journal":{"name":"The Tqm Magazine","volume":"65 8 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Tqm Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610659961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Purpose – Parallel with increasing awareness of importance in learning during the last few decades, numerous theorists from various disciplines have tried to shape ideas concerning learning seen from their perspectives. One negative consequence of these efforts has been observed as increased confusion and disputes among the theorists as well as practitioners due to “lacking of common ground” in their search on learning. Hence, the aim of this paper is to explore some critical aspects of learning, among others, root thinking, meaning of learning, nature, processes and outcomes of learning in order to identify possible common ground(s) in between various schools of thought. Design/methodology/approach – Through a literature survey the characteristics of learning in terms of the processes, the nature and the outcomes of learning are investigated. Besides the chosen contemporary literature on learning, ideas and philosophies of John Dewey (1859-1952) and Confucius (551-479, BC) have been explored in order to identify possible root thinking in the West and in the East. Findings – It is found that not much new knowledge has been accumulated since Confucius and despite multiple schools of thought in current research, the majority of western theorists base their ideas on Dewey's thinking. The meta learning wheel has been suggested to be a common ground for learning. Originality/value – The originalities of this paper are: both contemporary as well as classic literatures in learning are investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学东学西,学西学东
目的——在过去的几十年里,随着人们对学习重要性的认识不断提高,来自不同学科的许多理论家都试图从他们的角度来塑造关于学习的观点。这些努力的一个负面后果是,由于在对学习的研究中“缺乏共同点”,理论家和实践者之间的困惑和争论越来越多。因此,本文的目的是探讨学习的一些关键方面,其中包括根本思维,学习的意义,本质,学习的过程和结果,以确定不同思想流派之间可能的共同点。设计/方法论/方法-通过文献调查,研究学习过程的特点,学习的性质和结果。除了所选的当代学习文献外,还探讨了约翰·杜威(1859-1952)和孔子(公元前551-479)的思想和哲学,以确定西方和东方可能的根本思想。研究发现:自孔子以来,人们积累的新知识并不多,尽管目前的研究中存在多种思想流派,但大多数西方理论家的观点都是基于杜威的思想。元学习轮被认为是学习的共同基础。原创性/价值——本文的原创性在于:研究了当代和经典的学习文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The International Handbook on Innovation A new framework for managing change The validity of quality practices on performance of outsourced professional housing services EFQM model self‐assessment using a questionnaire approach in university administrative services Lean Six Sigma Statistics: Calculating Process Efficiencies in Transactional Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1