Student Perceptions Of The Online Discussion Board

Jack Mccann, Carrie Stringham, Sheree Nelson
{"title":"Student Perceptions Of The Online Discussion Board","authors":"Jack Mccann, Carrie Stringham, Sheree Nelson","doi":"10.18639/merj.2023.9900078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examined student perceptions of asynchronous discussion boards using the focused group methodology using an applied research approach. The research purpose was to explore what online students perceive to be worthwhile discussion board content and interactions in online college courses. Ultimately, the goal was to add to the growing body of literature that fosters a deeper understanding of how to improve both teaching strategy and instructional design and increase both the quality and quantity of student participation. The researchers recruited volunteers from closed undergraduate courses to participate in the survey. Emerging themes included concerns over busy work, excessive time requirements, overly structured discussion boards, and the importance of quality, relevance, professor involvement, and respect. To improve participation, teaching strategy, and instructional design for online courses, each of these themes should be addressed as part of the discussion board design and in the online classroom.","PeriodicalId":406779,"journal":{"name":"Management and Economics Research Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18639/merj.2023.9900078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examined student perceptions of asynchronous discussion boards using the focused group methodology using an applied research approach. The research purpose was to explore what online students perceive to be worthwhile discussion board content and interactions in online college courses. Ultimately, the goal was to add to the growing body of literature that fosters a deeper understanding of how to improve both teaching strategy and instructional design and increase both the quality and quantity of student participation. The researchers recruited volunteers from closed undergraduate courses to participate in the survey. Emerging themes included concerns over busy work, excessive time requirements, overly structured discussion boards, and the importance of quality, relevance, professor involvement, and respect. To improve participation, teaching strategy, and instructional design for online courses, each of these themes should be addressed as part of the discussion board design and in the online classroom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对在线讨论板的看法
本研究采用应用研究方法,采用焦点小组方法,考察了学生对异步讨论板的看法。研究的目的是探索在线学生认为哪些是有价值的讨论板内容和在线大学课程中的互动。最终,我们的目标是在不断增长的文献中增加对如何改进教学策略和教学设计以及提高学生参与的质量和数量的更深层次的理解。研究人员从封闭的本科课程中招募志愿者参与调查。新出现的主题包括对繁忙的工作、过多的时间要求、过度结构化的讨论板以及质量、相关性、教授参与和尊重的重要性的担忧。为了提高在线课程的参与度、教学策略和教学设计,这些主题都应该作为讨论板设计和在线课堂的一部分加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brazil, BRICS Membership And FDI: Economic Divergence And Future Prospects A Note On Persistence In Indian IT Equities Can The Zambian Insurance Industry Use Internal Hire Versus External Hire As A Strategic Tool? South African Public Sector Post-Apartheid Economic Initiatives For Human Development: Why Were The Strategies Short-Lived? Outbound Logistics And Profitability Among Sugar Manufacturing Firms In Kenya: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1