Revisiting a Natural Experiment: Do Legislators with Daughters Vote More Liberally on Women’s Issues?

D. Green, Oliver Hyman-Metzger, G. Sood, Michelle A. Zee
{"title":"Revisiting a Natural Experiment: Do Legislators with Daughters Vote More Liberally on Women’s Issues?","authors":"D. Green, Oliver Hyman-Metzger, G. Sood, Michelle A. Zee","doi":"10.1086/724744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pioneering work of Washington in 2008 shows that legislators with daughters cast more liberal roll call votes on women’s issues. Costa and coauthors in 2019 find that this pattern subsides in more recent congresses and speculate that increasing party polarization might diminish the “daughter effect.” We investigate patterns of change over time by looking at eight congresses prior to the four studied by Washington and eight subsequent congresses, including three not included by Costa and coauthors. Contrary to the party polarization hypothesis, we find no daughter effect prior to the period that Washington studied and no effect thereafter.","PeriodicalId":289840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The pioneering work of Washington in 2008 shows that legislators with daughters cast more liberal roll call votes on women’s issues. Costa and coauthors in 2019 find that this pattern subsides in more recent congresses and speculate that increasing party polarization might diminish the “daughter effect.” We investigate patterns of change over time by looking at eight congresses prior to the four studied by Washington and eight subsequent congresses, including three not included by Costa and coauthors. Contrary to the party polarization hypothesis, we find no daughter effect prior to the period that Washington studied and no effect thereafter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视一个自然实验:有女儿的立法者在妇女问题上更自由地投票吗?
2008年华盛顿的开创性工作表明,有女儿的立法者在妇女问题上投了更自由的点名票。科斯塔和他的合著者在2019年发现,这种模式在最近的国会中有所减弱,并推测政党两极分化的加剧可能会削弱“女儿效应”。我们通过观察华盛顿研究的四届国会之前的八届国会和随后的八届国会(包括科斯塔及其合作者未包括的三届国会)来调查随时间变化的模式。与党派极化假说相反,我们发现在华盛顿研究的时期之前没有女儿效应,之后也没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Search and Price Discrimination Online Fairness Gaps for Earnings Tax Design Navigating the Notches: Charity Responses to Ratings Whose Preferences Matter for Redistribution: Cross-Country Evidence Cultural Assimilation and Nation Building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1