Marriage or License to Rape? A Socio-Legal Analysis of Marital Rape in India

Vidhik Kumar
{"title":"Marriage or License to Rape? A Socio-Legal Analysis of Marital Rape in India","authors":"Vidhik Kumar","doi":"10.23860/dignity.2021.06.03.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rape exposes the failure of society’s institutions which were established to provide better security to an individual in a society. These institutions sometimes not only failed to protect an individual from such grave assaults on their autonomy and privacy, but also sanctioned them by either providing them legitimacy by law or not illegitimating them. States often have either provided legal sanctity to rapes within marriage or have refrained from declaring it a crime, on account of it being a private sphere not open to interference. Rape within marriage or marital rape is a global problem, and it is argued that not only it is more prevalent than rapes committed outside the purview of marriage by strangers or ex-partners, but also that it has equivalent catastrophic effects on the victims. Although several counties have criminalized marital rapes or withdrew exemptions granted to rape within marriage, the situation has hardly changed in India, which has yet to criminalize marital rape. This note henceforth will attempt to analyze the historical background of how marital rape obtained legal sanctity, its prevalence globally and in the Indian society, its effects on the victims, and the shortcomings in the legal system of India.","PeriodicalId":347932,"journal":{"name":"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2021.06.03.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rape exposes the failure of society’s institutions which were established to provide better security to an individual in a society. These institutions sometimes not only failed to protect an individual from such grave assaults on their autonomy and privacy, but also sanctioned them by either providing them legitimacy by law or not illegitimating them. States often have either provided legal sanctity to rapes within marriage or have refrained from declaring it a crime, on account of it being a private sphere not open to interference. Rape within marriage or marital rape is a global problem, and it is argued that not only it is more prevalent than rapes committed outside the purview of marriage by strangers or ex-partners, but also that it has equivalent catastrophic effects on the victims. Although several counties have criminalized marital rapes or withdrew exemptions granted to rape within marriage, the situation has hardly changed in India, which has yet to criminalize marital rape. This note henceforth will attempt to analyze the historical background of how marital rape obtained legal sanctity, its prevalence globally and in the Indian society, its effects on the victims, and the shortcomings in the legal system of India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结婚还是强奸执照?印度婚内强奸的社会法律分析
强奸暴露了社会制度的失败,这些制度的建立是为了给社会中的个人提供更好的安全。这些机构有时不仅不能保护个人免受对其自主权和隐私的严重侵犯,而且还通过法律赋予其合法性或不使其非法化来认可它们。国家往往对婚内强奸规定了法律上的神圣性,或者不将其宣布为犯罪,因为这是一个不允许干涉的私人领域。婚内强奸或婚内强奸是一个全球性问题,有人认为,它不仅比陌生人或前伴侣在婚姻范围之外实施的强奸更为普遍,而且对受害者也有同样的灾难性影响。虽然有几个国家已将婚内强奸定为犯罪,或撤销了对婚内强奸的豁免,但印度的情况几乎没有改变,该国尚未将婚内强奸定为犯罪。本文将尝试分析婚内强奸如何获得法律神圣性的历史背景,它在全球和印度社会的流行程度,它对受害者的影响,以及印度法律制度的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Censorship of Family Violence in Cinema in Iran Barriers to Escape: How Homelessness and Drug Addiction Prevent Women from Escaping Sex Trafficking and Commercial Sex Against the Mainstreaming of the Term Sex Work: Advocacy with India's Supreme Court Immigrant Women from Iran and Afghanistan in Sweden: Experiences of Domestic Violence During the COVID Pandemic The Happy Hooker Revisited: Trauma and Sexualized Memories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1