Effective Use of Rubrics in Computer Assisted Subjective Answer-Script Evaluation

Kissan G. G. Dessai, V. Kamat, R. Wagh
{"title":"Effective Use of Rubrics in Computer Assisted Subjective Answer-Script Evaluation","authors":"Kissan G. G. Dessai, V. Kamat, R. Wagh","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2014.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of student examination answer-scripts and result compilation are two laborious but crucial post examination tasks. In the manual process of evaluation and result compilation, errors in marking, tabulation, recording, calculation coupled with the impact of Examiner subjectivity or Examiner variability, are very common. Most of the currently used methods partially address these problems by employing additional human resources and time. There is a need to adopt a unified approach that would ensure uniformity within and across examiners and deal with errors associated with evaluation and result compilation more effectively. This paper presents a pragmatic and experientially developed computer assisted evaluation of subjective answer scripts using rubrics. The proposed approach focuses on improving the evaluation and result compilation tasks by reducing/eliminating the errors and examiner variability to re-align the examination system from highly error prone to extremely robust and reliable stream.","PeriodicalId":151911,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2014.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Evaluation of student examination answer-scripts and result compilation are two laborious but crucial post examination tasks. In the manual process of evaluation and result compilation, errors in marking, tabulation, recording, calculation coupled with the impact of Examiner subjectivity or Examiner variability, are very common. Most of the currently used methods partially address these problems by employing additional human resources and time. There is a need to adopt a unified approach that would ensure uniformity within and across examiners and deal with errors associated with evaluation and result compilation more effectively. This paper presents a pragmatic and experientially developed computer assisted evaluation of subjective answer scripts using rubrics. The proposed approach focuses on improving the evaluation and result compilation tasks by reducing/eliminating the errors and examiner variability to re-align the examination system from highly error prone to extremely robust and reliable stream.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在计算机辅助主观答题卡评价中规则的有效使用
学生考试答卷的评阅和成绩的编制是两项繁重而又关键的考试后工作。在人工评估和成绩编制过程中,在标记、制表、记录、计算方面的错误加上主考官的主观性或考官的可变性的影响是非常常见的。目前使用的大多数方法通过雇用额外的人力资源和时间来部分解决这些问题。有必要采用一种统一的方法,以确保审查员内部和审查员之间的一致性,并更有效地处理与评价和结果汇编有关的错误。本文提出了一个实用的和经验开发的计算机辅助评价主观答案脚本使用规则。提出的方法侧重于通过减少/消除错误和考官的可变性来改进评估和结果编译任务,从而将考试系统从高度容易出错重新调整为非常健壮和可靠的流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Any Time Virtual Labs: On Portable Media and as Debian Packages Fair and Non-repudiable Protocol for Exchange of E-examination Question Paper and Answer-Scripts NaVaSH: Examination Software for ICT Based Institutions A Self Study Learning Environment for Modeling Abilities: Do All Learners Take the Same Learning Path? Beyond interfaces: Understanding the Process of Designing Grassroots technologies, to Develop Sustainability Case Studies for Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1