Mass Timber Modular Construction: Developments in Oregon

J. Sheine, M. Donofrio, M. Gershfeld
{"title":"Mass Timber Modular Construction: Developments in Oregon","authors":"J. Sheine, M. Donofrio, M. Gershfeld","doi":"10.29173/MOCS97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the mass timber industry taking off in 2015 in Oregon, when DR Johnson Lumber in Riddle, OR started producing CLT panels, government officials were eager to support it for its promise of economic development in rural communities and also had hopes of addressing the state’s affordable housing crisis using mass timber modular construction. While mass timber modular housing has had some success in Europe, the different construction standards and building culture in the United States make it more challenging. With few areas in Oregon in which housing is likely to be built over six stories tall or in large-scale developments, it did not seem possible that mass timber could solve the affordable housing crisis where it cannot compete in cost with standard light wood-frame construction. However, it did seem feasible that mass timber panels, which are so well-suited to customizable pre-fabrication through digital manufacturing, might be successful in an alternative building type for modular construction: classrooms. In successful models of mass timber modular classrooms in Austria and Germany, schools were built in much shorter timeframes and for 25% less cost than steel or concrete construction. The authors are now working with a modular building manufacturer in Oregon, Modern Building Systems (MBS), that produces custom-designed modular light wood-frame classrooms. While mass timber classrooms cannot compete in price with light wood-frame, particularly in single-story applications, they could be competitive for two story (or taller) schools, which are usually built using steel braced-frame and concrete block. Because MBS is 18 miles west of Freres Lumber, which is newly producing Mass Plywood Panels (MPP), and the MBS facility needs no modifications to use MPP instead of wood-frame, the authors are working with them to design an economically competitive mass timber module, with several potential clients interested in testing a prototype in 2019.","PeriodicalId":422911,"journal":{"name":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/MOCS97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the mass timber industry taking off in 2015 in Oregon, when DR Johnson Lumber in Riddle, OR started producing CLT panels, government officials were eager to support it for its promise of economic development in rural communities and also had hopes of addressing the state’s affordable housing crisis using mass timber modular construction. While mass timber modular housing has had some success in Europe, the different construction standards and building culture in the United States make it more challenging. With few areas in Oregon in which housing is likely to be built over six stories tall or in large-scale developments, it did not seem possible that mass timber could solve the affordable housing crisis where it cannot compete in cost with standard light wood-frame construction. However, it did seem feasible that mass timber panels, which are so well-suited to customizable pre-fabrication through digital manufacturing, might be successful in an alternative building type for modular construction: classrooms. In successful models of mass timber modular classrooms in Austria and Germany, schools were built in much shorter timeframes and for 25% less cost than steel or concrete construction. The authors are now working with a modular building manufacturer in Oregon, Modern Building Systems (MBS), that produces custom-designed modular light wood-frame classrooms. While mass timber classrooms cannot compete in price with light wood-frame, particularly in single-story applications, they could be competitive for two story (or taller) schools, which are usually built using steel braced-frame and concrete block. Because MBS is 18 miles west of Freres Lumber, which is newly producing Mass Plywood Panels (MPP), and the MBS facility needs no modifications to use MPP instead of wood-frame, the authors are working with them to design an economically competitive mass timber module, with several potential clients interested in testing a prototype in 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模木材模块化建筑:俄勒冈州的发展
随着2015年俄勒冈州大规模木材产业的起飞,当DR Johnson Lumber in Riddle, OR开始生产CLT板时,政府官员渴望支持它,因为它承诺在农村社区发展经济,也希望通过大规模木材模块化建筑来解决该州的经济适用房危机。虽然大量木材模块化住宅在欧洲取得了一些成功,但美国不同的建筑标准和建筑文化使其更具挑战性。由于俄勒冈州很少有地区可能建造超过六层楼的房屋或进行大规模开发,因此大规模木材似乎不太可能解决经济适用房危机,因为它无法与标准的轻型木结构建筑在成本上竞争。然而,通过数字制造非常适合定制预制的大量木板似乎是可行的,它们可能在模块化建筑的另一种建筑类型中取得成功:教室。在奥地利和德国成功的大规模木材模块化教室模型中,学校在更短的时间内建成,比钢结构或混凝土结构的成本低25%。作者现在正在与俄勒冈州的模块化建筑制造商现代建筑系统公司(MBS)合作,该公司生产定制设计的模块化轻型木结构教室。虽然大型木材教室在价格上无法与轻型木结构教室竞争,特别是在单层建筑中,但它们对于两层(或更高)的学校来说可能具有竞争力,这些学校通常使用钢支撑框架和混凝土块建造。由于MBS位于Freres Lumber以西18英里处,该公司正在新生产大型胶合板(MPP),而且MBS工厂不需要修改就可以使用MPP代替木框架,因此作者正在与他们合作设计一种具有经济竞争力的大型木材模块,有几个潜在客户有兴趣在2019年测试原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VDC management in the industrialization process using prefabricated reinforcement cages. Case Study: Ovalo Monitor Bridge Keyword identification framework for speech communication on construction sites Offsite Construction education adoption in Civil Engineering undergraduate curriculum: analysis and proposal Layout modelling of the built environment for autonomous mobile robots using Building Information Modelling (BIM) and simulation An holistic approach to product evaluation and selection in industrialised building: Benchmarking of long span, low carbon floor systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1