Matching Soulmates

Greg Leo, Jian Lou, Martin Van der Linden, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, M. Wooders
{"title":"Matching Soulmates","authors":"Greg Leo, Jian Lou, Martin Van der Linden, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, M. Wooders","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2833553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study iterated matching of soulmates [IMS] — the process of matching coalitions that are the favorite for each member (soulmates), coalitions of soulmates in the remaining group, and so on. Coalitions produced by IMS belong to any stable partition and mechanisms that implement IMS give players in these coalitions (or who at least believe they are) no incentive to deviate from truthful preference reporting, even jointly. When everyone is matched by IMS, these mechanisms are stable and have a truthful strong Nash equilibrium. Furthermore, we show, using real-world data and simulation, that scenarios in which many people are matched by IMS are common under natural kinds of preferences.","PeriodicalId":346559,"journal":{"name":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2833553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We study iterated matching of soulmates [IMS] — the process of matching coalitions that are the favorite for each member (soulmates), coalitions of soulmates in the remaining group, and so on. Coalitions produced by IMS belong to any stable partition and mechanisms that implement IMS give players in these coalitions (or who at least believe they are) no incentive to deviate from truthful preference reporting, even jointly. When everyone is matched by IMS, these mechanisms are stable and have a truthful strong Nash equilibrium. Furthermore, we show, using real-world data and simulation, that scenarios in which many people are matched by IMS are common under natural kinds of preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹配的知音
我们研究了灵魂伴侣的迭代匹配[IMS]——匹配每个成员(灵魂伴侣)最喜欢的联盟的过程,以及剩余群体中灵魂伴侣的联盟,等等。IMS产生的联盟属于任何稳定的分区,实现IMS的机制使这些联盟中的参与者(或至少相信他们是)没有动机偏离真实的偏好报告,即使是联合的。当每个人都被IMS匹配时,这些机制是稳定的,并且具有真实的强纳什均衡。此外,我们使用真实世界的数据和模拟表明,IMS匹配许多人的场景在自然偏好类型下很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disregarding the Shoulders of Giants: Inferences from Innovation Research Exploration and Exploitation in US Technological Change The Arms Race of Models: Complexify or Die Destabilization and Consolidation: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Validating the Dual Characteristics of Technology Patent Classification Systems and Technological Categorization: An Overview and Data Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1