Anonymous Capital Flows and U.S. Housing Markets

Sean Hundtofte, V. Rantala
{"title":"Anonymous Capital Flows and U.S. Housing Markets","authors":"Sean Hundtofte, V. Rantala","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3186634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior to 2016, all-cash purchases of residential real estate were a key loophole in US anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations. Beginning in January 2016, the Department of the Treasury announced orders requiring the owners of LLCs purchasing high-end residential real estate to identify themselves to authorities. We use a new detailed transactional dataset to identify all-cash purchases by corporate entities before and after the introduction of this new AML policy, and thus estimate the size and impact of anonymity-seeking capital on U.S. housing markets. We first find that all-cash purchases by corporate entities form approximately 10% of the dollar volume of housing purchases in our sample prior to the change in policy. After anonymity is no longer freely available to domestic and foreign investors, all-cash purchases by corporations fall by approximately 70%, indicating the share of anonymity-seeking investors using LLCs as “shell corporations.” Testing for potential distortionary market impacts, we find subsequent declines in luxury house prices in counties targeted by the policy relative to untargeted counties. Our findings are relevant to the (mis)measurement of international net investment flows, and to understanding a demand for anonymity that may impact certain asset classes (art, cryptocurrencies) regardless of their risk/reward characteristics.","PeriodicalId":376821,"journal":{"name":"White Collar Crime eJournal","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"White Collar Crime eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3186634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Prior to 2016, all-cash purchases of residential real estate were a key loophole in US anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations. Beginning in January 2016, the Department of the Treasury announced orders requiring the owners of LLCs purchasing high-end residential real estate to identify themselves to authorities. We use a new detailed transactional dataset to identify all-cash purchases by corporate entities before and after the introduction of this new AML policy, and thus estimate the size and impact of anonymity-seeking capital on U.S. housing markets. We first find that all-cash purchases by corporate entities form approximately 10% of the dollar volume of housing purchases in our sample prior to the change in policy. After anonymity is no longer freely available to domestic and foreign investors, all-cash purchases by corporations fall by approximately 70%, indicating the share of anonymity-seeking investors using LLCs as “shell corporations.” Testing for potential distortionary market impacts, we find subsequent declines in luxury house prices in counties targeted by the policy relative to untargeted counties. Our findings are relevant to the (mis)measurement of international net investment flows, and to understanding a demand for anonymity that may impact certain asset classes (art, cryptocurrencies) regardless of their risk/reward characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匿名资本流动与美国房地产市场
2016年之前,全现金购买住宅房地产是美国反洗钱(AML)法规的一个关键漏洞。从2016年1月开始,美国财政部(Department of Treasury)宣布命令,要求购买高端住宅房地产的有限责任公司的所有者向当局证明自己的身份。我们使用一个新的详细交易数据集来识别公司实体在引入这一新的“反洗钱”政策之前和之后的全现金购买,从而估计匿名寻求资本对美国房地产市场的规模和影响。我们首先发现,在我们的样本中,在政策变化之前,公司实体的全现金购买约占住房购买量的10%。在国内外投资者不再可以自由地匿名之后,企业的全现金收购减少了约70%,这表明寻求匿名的投资者将有限责任公司作为“空壳公司”使用的比例。测试潜在的扭曲市场影响,我们发现,相对于非目标县,受政策影响的县的豪宅价格随后下降。我们的研究结果与国际净投资流量的(错误)测量有关,并与理解可能影响某些资产类别(艺术品、加密货币)的匿名需求有关,而不管其风险/回报特征如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
White Collar Crime - An Overview A Historical Flashback of the Formation and Development of Criminal Liability for the Legalization of Money or Other Property Acquired by Criminal Can Countries Justify the Existence of Insider Trading Laws? An Indian Perspective Insider Trading and Strategic Disclosure Securities Scholars’ Comment Letter on Draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1