MILITARY, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES WITH THE UPR ARMY INTERNED SOLDIERS IN UKRAINIAN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF POST-WAR PERIOD

M. Stopchak
{"title":"MILITARY, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES WITH THE UPR ARMY INTERNED SOLDIERS IN UKRAINIAN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF POST-WAR PERIOD","authors":"M. Stopchak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-97-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period on the activities of government agencies of the UPR to raise the professional and cultural-educational level of Ukrainian interned soldiers. It is shown that the party confrontation, which continued within the Ukrainian political emigration and in the postwar period, complicated the coverage of the significant efforts of the State Center of the UPR led by S. Petliura to preserve the interned Army of the UPR, its comprehensive preparation for further struggle for state independence. However, historians of the postwar period have prepared a number of works in which these activities, including and its aspects, such as military-professional and cultural-educational work, were covered much more deeply and comprehensively than in the interwar period. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. In some of them, mostly in the memoirs of former participants of those events, as a rule, only certain aspects of it were briefly considered, and generalized conclusions were drawn. These are the publications of V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar, and others. authors. This also applies to some works of a monographic nature devoted to the events of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917 – 1921 (I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko). The materials published in them on the problem are fragmentary, in fact, only outlining the directions of its further study. At the same time, the authors of some monographs (P. Fedenko), memoirs (P. Bilon, O. Semmo) departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, presented a wide range of military-professional and cultural-educational work in camps for interned Ukrainian soldiers. It is emphasized that the lack of access to materials stored in Soviet archives, the use of former Taborites as sources of memories led to the appearance in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period of certain factual errors, inaccuracies, subjective assessments, which to some extent reduced their level.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-97-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period on the activities of government agencies of the UPR to raise the professional and cultural-educational level of Ukrainian interned soldiers. It is shown that the party confrontation, which continued within the Ukrainian political emigration and in the postwar period, complicated the coverage of the significant efforts of the State Center of the UPR led by S. Petliura to preserve the interned Army of the UPR, its comprehensive preparation for further struggle for state independence. However, historians of the postwar period have prepared a number of works in which these activities, including and its aspects, such as military-professional and cultural-educational work, were covered much more deeply and comprehensively than in the interwar period. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. In some of them, mostly in the memoirs of former participants of those events, as a rule, only certain aspects of it were briefly considered, and generalized conclusions were drawn. These are the publications of V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar, and others. authors. This also applies to some works of a monographic nature devoted to the events of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917 – 1921 (I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko). The materials published in them on the problem are fragmentary, in fact, only outlining the directions of its further study. At the same time, the authors of some monographs (P. Fedenko), memoirs (P. Bilon, O. Semmo) departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, presented a wide range of military-professional and cultural-educational work in camps for interned Ukrainian soldiers. It is emphasized that the lack of access to materials stored in Soviet archives, the use of former Taborites as sources of memories led to the appearance in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period of certain factual errors, inaccuracies, subjective assessments, which to some extent reduced their level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事、文化和教育活动与upr军队拘禁士兵在乌克兰战后时期的外国史学
本文分析了战后时期乌克兰外国历史学家对普遍定期审议政府机构为提高乌克兰被俘士兵的专业和文化教育水平而进行的活动的史学成就。文章表明,在乌克兰政治移民和战后时期持续的政党对抗,使得对彼得利乌拉领导的普遍定期审议国家中心为保存被拘留的普遍定期审议军队所做的重大努力的报道复杂化,这是普遍定期审议为进一步争取国家独立而进行的全面准备。然而,战后时期的历史学家已经准备了一些作品,其中这些活动,包括其方面,如军事专业和文化教育工作,比两次世界大战期间更深入和全面。值得注意的是,并非所有的作品都涵盖了同样的研究问题。在其中一些报告中,主要是在这些事件的前参与者的回忆录中,通常只简要地考虑了事件的某些方面,并得出了笼统的结论。这些是V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar和其他人的出版物。作者。这也适用于专门研究1917 - 1921年乌克兰革命事件的一些专著(I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko)。他们所发表的关于这个问题的材料是零碎的,事实上,只是概述了进一步研究的方向。与此同时,一些专著(P. Fedenko)、回忆录(P. Bilon、O. Semmo)的作者除了简单扼要地叙述所研究问题的众所周知的事实外,还提出了在乌克兰被拘禁士兵营地进行的广泛的军事、专业和文化教育工作。报告强调,由于无法接触苏联档案中储存的材料,以及使用前塔博利特人作为记忆来源,导致战后时期乌克兰外国历史学家的著作中出现某些事实错误、不准确和主观评价,从而在一定程度上降低了其水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PRIMARY COLLECTION REGISTERS OF THE ESTATES OF PRINCE V.-K. OF OSTROH 1577 MILITARY HISTORICAL WORK IN CAMPS FOR INTERNED SOLDIERS OF THE UPR ARMY: CONTEMPORARY NATIONWIDE HISTORIOGRAPHY CULTURAL DIPLOMACY OF THE UKRAINIAN WORLD CONGRESS AS A FACTOR OF PROMOTING OF UKRAINE IN THE WORLD (2014–22) ACTIVITIES OF «PROSVITA» COMPANY IN VYSOKA PICH VILLAGE OF ZHYTOMYR REGION IN 1920 ORAL HISTORICAL TESTIMONY AND MEMORIES AS A SOURCE FOR THE STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR: METHODOLOGICAL AND LEGAL BASIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1