Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-6-12
Y. Pshenychnyi, A. Bardetskyi, Volodymyr Marchuk
Archaeological excavation of ancient Dubno monasteries, founded by dukes Ostrozki, much disclose the history of these places. In their time, they defined original culture-religion character of the town. Investigation on the territory of Voznesenskyi monastery with large square in 2018–2022 gave possibilities to analyze large items from end of XVI – first third of XIX cc. There were the original fragments of pottery found among ceramic complexes. They have scratched letters in graffiti technique. Total found six specimens of pottery with such kinds of marks. The territorial and chronological frameworks of everyday using of such wares are considered. The review of European monastery complexes with similar founds witnesses about wide culture context of this phenomena. After the discovery these finds, dated of XIII c., in Cistercian monastery in Herkenrode monastery (Belgium), the interest for its study had significantly grown. Subsequent investigation allowed to find many potteries scratched with letters marks in women monasteries in Belgium, Netherlands, France and Lithuania. As far as we know, the fragments identified on the excavation near Dubno are the first facts of such finds in Ukraine. The possibilities of use the pottery with scratched letters are under consider in the article. They are associated with the social structure inside the monasteries. Written sources show that some part of nuns stood out in the economic status and ate better dishes. In addition, this could do novitiates. These pottery might use also in the medical purposes.
{"title":"POTTERY WITH SCRATCHED LETTERS OF XVII–XVIII CENTURIES FROM VOZNESENSKYI MONASTERY NEAR DUBNO","authors":"Y. Pshenychnyi, A. Bardetskyi, Volodymyr Marchuk","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-6-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-6-12","url":null,"abstract":"Archaeological excavation of ancient Dubno monasteries, founded by dukes Ostrozki, much disclose the history of these places. In their time, they defined original culture-religion character of the town. Investigation on the territory of Voznesenskyi monastery with large square in 2018–2022 gave possibilities to analyze large items from end of XVI – first third of XIX cc. There were the original fragments of pottery found among ceramic complexes. They have scratched letters in graffiti technique. Total found six specimens of pottery with such kinds of marks. The territorial and chronological frameworks of everyday using of such wares are considered. The review of European monastery complexes with similar founds witnesses about wide culture context of this phenomena. After the discovery these finds, dated of XIII c., in Cistercian monastery in Herkenrode monastery (Belgium), the interest for its study had significantly grown. Subsequent investigation allowed to find many potteries scratched with letters marks in women monasteries in Belgium, Netherlands, France and Lithuania. As far as we know, the fragments identified on the excavation near Dubno are the first facts of such finds in Ukraine. The possibilities of use the pottery with scratched letters are under consider in the article. They are associated with the social structure inside the monasteries. Written sources show that some part of nuns stood out in the economic status and ate better dishes. In addition, this could do novitiates. These pottery might use also in the medical purposes.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125869201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-37-44
V. Trofymovych, Liliia V. Trofymovych
After the return of the underground insurgent movement members from camps and special settlements to the western regions of the Ukrainian SSR, some of them began to resume illegal propaganda activities. This is hardly covered in Ukrainian historiography. Based on numerous factual material, obtained from the 2nd and 16th funds of the Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine and for the first time introduced into scientific circulation, the authors found out its forms and features: distribution among the population of the program documents of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, production and distribution of leaflets, inscriptions, drawings of anti-Soviet content, hanging yellow-blue flags, holding conversations on forbidden topics in the working and youth environments. The article shows the influence of propaganda activities of OUN members on the emergence and development of the dissident movement. The material presented in the article also shows that a part of the Ukrainian intelligentsia with nationalist beliefs, which, fearing repressions, for a long time stood aside from the anti-Soviet struggle, began to speak out more courageously, trying to rehabilitate themselves in front of their comrades from the underground. In particular, its representatives in their conversations, speeches, publications criticized the national policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the course of Russification of Ukraine, the attack on the Ukrainian language, the thesis of the "great Russian people", etc. The position taken by them was, according to KGB officers, identical to the position of former members of the OUN underground. It is proved that the state security agencies of the Ukrainian SSR made great efforts, using a variety of techniques and methods, to neutralize the anti-Soviet underground and to discredit it in the eyes of the public.
{"title":"THE PROPAGANDA ACTIVITY OF MEMBERS OF THE UNDERGROUND INSURGENT MOVEMENT IN THE WESTERN REGIONS OF THE USSR AFTER THEIR RETURN FROM CAMPS AND SPECIAL SETTLEMENTS (SECOND HALF OF THE 1950S – 1970S)","authors":"V. Trofymovych, Liliia V. Trofymovych","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-37-44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-37-44","url":null,"abstract":"After the return of the underground insurgent movement members from camps and special settlements to the western regions of the Ukrainian SSR, some of them began to resume illegal propaganda activities. This is hardly covered in Ukrainian historiography. Based on numerous factual material, obtained from the 2nd and 16th funds of the Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine and for the first time introduced into scientific circulation, the authors found out its forms and features: distribution among the population of the program documents of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, production and distribution of leaflets, inscriptions, drawings of anti-Soviet content, hanging yellow-blue flags, holding conversations on forbidden topics in the working and youth environments. The article shows the influence of propaganda activities of OUN members on the emergence and development of the dissident movement. The material presented in the article also shows that a part of the Ukrainian intelligentsia with nationalist beliefs, which, fearing repressions, for a long time stood aside from the anti-Soviet struggle, began to speak out more courageously, trying to rehabilitate themselves in front of their comrades from the underground. In particular, its representatives in their conversations, speeches, publications criticized the national policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the course of Russification of Ukraine, the attack on the Ukrainian language, the thesis of the \"great Russian people\", etc. The position taken by them was, according to KGB officers, identical to the position of former members of the OUN underground. It is proved that the state security agencies of the Ukrainian SSR made great efforts, using a variety of techniques and methods, to neutralize the anti-Soviet underground and to discredit it in the eyes of the public.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125360643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-86-94
Dmytro Symonovych
The article attempts to analyze the works of modern researchers of the beginnings of Vyacheslav Lypynskyi's life (childhood, high school, and student periods) in terms of their assessments of the circumstances, factors, and ways of shaping those features of his worldview that contributed to his formation as a leading figure of the Ukrainian conservative and independent movement of the first third of the twentieth century. Their interpretation of the critical aspects of the problem under study is considered, and in this sense, the main approaches of modern Lipinski scholarship are defined.
{"title":"THE BEGINNING OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF V. LYPYNSKYI'S CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENCE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHY","authors":"Dmytro Symonovych","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-86-94","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-86-94","url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to analyze the works of modern researchers of the beginnings of Vyacheslav Lypynskyi's life (childhood, high school, and student periods) in terms of their assessments of the circumstances, factors, and ways of shaping those features of his worldview that contributed to his formation as a leading figure of the Ukrainian conservative and independent movement of the first third of the twentieth century. Their interpretation of the critical aspects of the problem under study is considered, and in this sense, the main approaches of modern Lipinski scholarship are defined.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126198306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-115-122
Antonina Skydanova
The author is focused on how changes in the military and political sphere of the late Russian empire have affected the number, character and significance of the military service of Ukrainians in the Imperial Army. The manning of the Armed Forces of the Russian Empire from the reform of 1874 to the First World War was balancing between the two poles: the creation of conditions for rapid deployment of the army and the consideration of the Empires state-building priorities. Eventually, the second pole turned out to be dominant and became the main for the manning of troops. The Empire Army turned into an instrument and at the same time a mirror of domestic policy. The place of a nation in the structure of the Armed Forces was a projection of its status in the Empire and showed probable prospects for its future. In the last decades of the XIX century the practice of restrictions and exclusion from the military service was finally established to those nations who the Empire wanted to colonize or keep under the rule. Keeping under the rule was guaranteed by placing on the territories of their residence not the multinational contingent of troops (Grand Duchy of Finland, former Kingdom of Poland, Caucasus, the nations of Siberia, etc.). These troops, as everywhere in the Empire, were 75 percent consisted of so-called «Russian Nation». The «Russian Nation» as an intellectual and ideological construction included Ukrainians, Russians and Belarusians. The idea of the «three-part Russian Nation» centrality as the «Russian Imperial Nation» became predominant for the rule of Alexander III and Nicholas II. This meant that Ukrainians completely became hostages of the Empire in the military and political sense. At the beginning of XX century Ukraine was intensively used as a conscription pool district. In 1907, 22,5% of new recruits were Ukrainians. It should be noted that the qualification of Ukrainians as part of the «Russian Nation» and military practices with them have provided potential opportunities for the deployment of processes that were in total opposition to the strategic ideas of the Russian Empire. Significant part of Ukrainians in military units, reduced terms of military service, and involvement compatriots in teaching of new recruits gave a good chance to keep local identity among soldiers. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, the Russian Imperial army still had poor chances to become a «school of the nation» according to the German model, first of all because of the undeveloped system of school education – the basis for the education of the citizens. In the army soldiers were memorizing titles, drill and combat commands, responsibilities in Russian, seared the oath of loyalty to the Emperor. This was not enough for radical changes in their identity. With the change of circumstances in 1917, many Ukrainian soldiers of the Imperial Army had already wanted to create separate Ukrainian military units and quickly joined the Ukrainian revolutionar
{"title":"UKRAINIANS IN THE SYSTEM OF MANNING THE ARMED FORCES OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MILITARY AND POLITICAL ASPECT","authors":"Antonina Skydanova","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-115-122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-115-122","url":null,"abstract":"The author is focused on how changes in the military and political sphere of the late Russian empire have affected the number, character and significance of the military service of Ukrainians in the Imperial Army. The manning of the Armed Forces of the Russian Empire from the reform of 1874 to the First World War was balancing between the two poles: the creation of conditions for rapid deployment of the army and the consideration of the Empires state-building priorities. Eventually, the second pole turned out to be dominant and became the main for the manning of troops. The Empire Army turned into an instrument and at the same time a mirror of domestic policy. The place of a nation in the structure of the Armed Forces was a projection of its status in the Empire and showed probable prospects for its future. In the last decades of the XIX century the practice of restrictions and exclusion from the military service was finally established to those nations who the Empire wanted to colonize or keep under the rule. Keeping under the rule was guaranteed by placing on the territories of their residence not the multinational contingent of troops (Grand Duchy of Finland, former Kingdom of Poland, Caucasus, the nations of Siberia, etc.). These troops, as everywhere in the Empire, were 75 percent consisted of so-called «Russian Nation». The «Russian Nation» as an intellectual and ideological construction included Ukrainians, Russians and Belarusians. The idea of the «three-part Russian Nation» centrality as the «Russian Imperial Nation» became predominant for the rule of Alexander III and Nicholas II. This meant that Ukrainians completely became hostages of the Empire in the military and political sense. At the beginning of XX century Ukraine was intensively used as a conscription pool district. In 1907, 22,5% of new recruits were Ukrainians. It should be noted that the qualification of Ukrainians as part of the «Russian Nation» and military practices with them have provided potential opportunities for the deployment of processes that were in total opposition to the strategic ideas of the Russian Empire. Significant part of Ukrainians in military units, reduced terms of military service, and involvement compatriots in teaching of new recruits gave a good chance to keep local identity among soldiers. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, the Russian Imperial army still had poor chances to become a «school of the nation» according to the German model, first of all because of the undeveloped system of school education – the basis for the education of the citizens. In the army soldiers were memorizing titles, drill and combat commands, responsibilities in Russian, seared the oath of loyalty to the Emperor. This was not enough for radical changes in their identity. With the change of circumstances in 1917, many Ukrainian soldiers of the Imperial Army had already wanted to create separate Ukrainian military units and quickly joined the Ukrainian revolutionar","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123943857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-104-113
Svitlana Hodzhal, Natalia Matviichuk
The paper attempts to summarize the experience gained in oral history research and interviews, which are applied to certain categories of respondents, to determine the place of oral history testimonies and memories as sources for the study of the Russian-Ukrainian war, and to outline certain legal aspects regarding the processing of interview results. Oral history methodology is much more developed abroad than in Ukraine. Acquisitions in the field of oral history must be actively used when acquiring practical skills in this direction. When interviewing, it is necessary to take into account such factors as the physical, emotional and mental state of the respondent. The main task of the oral history researcher is not only to get the least subjective source of information about certain event, but also not to harm the interviewee. Each category of respondents (divided according to different criteria) has its own peculiarities in interviewing. The narrative and survey technique depends on each category individually, which affects the method of evidence gathering. When interviewing, one should use all possible means and methods for qualitative creation of a narrative, as well as its subsequent transcription and preservation. If the interview is recorded using audio and not video, it does not mean that it is worse. Each type of technical equipment has its advantages and disadvantages, and the quality of the source that will be stored or used in scientific work depends to a large extent on the technical equipment and skills of the scientist. The correct legal registration of oral history evidence will help to use them in the future with the greatest benefit for science and social and political life. Oral history researchers in the process of collecting memories must strictly adhere to the legal norms of the current legislation, as well as to moral and ethical principles. Moreover, one should not forget that the respondent is not a historical source; he or she is a living person with his or her own experiences, fears and emotions. Only in this case the creation of oral history sources will result positively.
{"title":"ORAL HISTORICAL TESTIMONY AND MEMORIES AS A SOURCE FOR THE STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR: METHODOLOGICAL AND LEGAL BASIS","authors":"Svitlana Hodzhal, Natalia Matviichuk","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-104-113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-104-113","url":null,"abstract":"The paper attempts to summarize the experience gained in oral history research and interviews, which are applied to certain categories of respondents, to determine the place of oral history testimonies and memories as sources for the study of the Russian-Ukrainian war, and to outline certain legal aspects regarding the processing of interview results. Oral history methodology is much more developed abroad than in Ukraine. Acquisitions in the field of oral history must be actively used when acquiring practical skills in this direction. When interviewing, it is necessary to take into account such factors as the physical, emotional and mental state of the respondent. The main task of the oral history researcher is not only to get the least subjective source of information about certain event, but also not to harm the interviewee. Each category of respondents (divided according to different criteria) has its own peculiarities in interviewing. The narrative and survey technique depends on each category individually, which affects the method of evidence gathering. When interviewing, one should use all possible means and methods for qualitative creation of a narrative, as well as its subsequent transcription and preservation. If the interview is recorded using audio and not video, it does not mean that it is worse. Each type of technical equipment has its advantages and disadvantages, and the quality of the source that will be stored or used in scientific work depends to a large extent on the technical equipment and skills of the scientist. The correct legal registration of oral history evidence will help to use them in the future with the greatest benefit for science and social and political life. Oral history researchers in the process of collecting memories must strictly adhere to the legal norms of the current legislation, as well as to moral and ethical principles. Moreover, one should not forget that the respondent is not a historical source; he or she is a living person with his or her own experiences, fears and emotions. Only in this case the creation of oral history sources will result positively.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121253943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-54-58
I. Skakalska
The article analyzes the role of public discourse regarding the promotion of the name of Semen Zhuk. This will help to find out, firstly, how the use of Public History will contribute to the popularization of its activities. Secondly, what influence does public history have on society, using the example of spreading information about Semen Zhuk. In particular, through online communications, museum exhibitions, public lectures for a wide audience. Thirdly, S. Zhuk was destroyed by the Bolsheviks, like thousands of modern Ukrainians, and his name was forgotten for a long time. We should popularize our past with the tools of public history. The author set herself the goal of reconstructing the biography of Semen Zhuk by constructing the communication of the actor with modern society using the means of Public History. Research methods: generalizing, interactive, empirical, system-structural. As part of Public History, Semyon Zhuk's biography appears in a different format and is intended for public perception. Because academic texts published in scientific journals, conference proceedings, and monographs are read by professional historians or interested persons. Thus, understanding Semyon Zhuk's biography in the public space with the involvement of professional historians and representatives from outside academic history is an important step for popularizing his name. Historical science should focus more on the demands of society.
{"title":"BIOGRAPHY OF SEMEN ZHUK: PUBLIC HISTORY","authors":"I. Skakalska","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-54-58","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-54-58","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the role of public discourse regarding the promotion of the name of Semen Zhuk. This will help to find out, firstly, how the use of Public History will contribute to the popularization of its activities. Secondly, what influence does public history have on society, using the example of spreading information about Semen Zhuk. In particular, through online communications, museum exhibitions, public lectures for a wide audience. Thirdly, S. Zhuk was destroyed by the Bolsheviks, like thousands of modern Ukrainians, and his name was forgotten for a long time. We should popularize our past with the tools of public history. The author set herself the goal of reconstructing the biography of Semen Zhuk by constructing the communication of the actor with modern society using the means of Public History. Research methods: generalizing, interactive, empirical, system-structural. As part of Public History, Semyon Zhuk's biography appears in a different format and is intended for public perception. Because academic texts published in scientific journals, conference proceedings, and monographs are read by professional historians or interested persons. Thus, understanding Semyon Zhuk's biography in the public space with the involvement of professional historians and representatives from outside academic history is an important step for popularizing his name. Historical science should focus more on the demands of society.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134091993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-46-53
V. Atamanenko
The article examines the collection of primary collection registers of estates of the book V.-K. Ostrozki in 1577. They are an important element in the structure of descriptive-statistical sources from the history of Volyn. The primary registers were created by landowners or their representatives and were the basis for creating summary tax documents. The latter are widely used in research, including source studies and practice. Primary registers are not sufficiently introduced into scientific circulation. The importance of the primary registers of 1577 also lies in the fact that they reflected the devastation of Volyn after the Tatar attacks of 1575 and 1577. The presence of primary (1570 and 1577) and general (1570, 1577, 1583, 1589) collections registers creates opportunities to examine the state and dynamics of the development of social and economic phenomena. Other sources of a descriptive and statistical nature are unknown for the Volyn estates of the princes of Ostroh of the second half of the 16th century. The most important feature of collections registers is the display of social indicators of the urban and rural populations. Documentation of a primary nature, which was created by order of the owners and related to individual estate complexes, contains a number of testimonies that were lost during the generalization. Such are the formulary characteristics and language of primary fiscal notes, the level of implementation of economic innovations, elements of the gender structure of the population, anthroponymy, names of owners, etc. Primary collections registers were introduced on the territory of Volyn at the end of 1569, and their registration did not have an established standard due to the lack of tradition and experience. The nature of filing tax statements into the registers also differed. These features, even in the registers created by the same domain office, differed significantly. Tax documentation of the estates of V.-K. Ostrozky has a sufficiently high territorial representativeness. The entirety of tax documentation constitutes a single source system, which requires the study of all its elements, including primary tax registers.
{"title":"PRIMARY COLLECTION REGISTERS OF THE ESTATES OF PRINCE V.-K. OF OSTROH 1577","authors":"V. Atamanenko","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-46-53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-46-53","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the collection of primary collection registers of estates of the book V.-K. Ostrozki in 1577. They are an important element in the structure of descriptive-statistical sources from the history of Volyn. The primary registers were created by landowners or their representatives and were the basis for creating summary tax documents. The latter are widely used in research, including source studies and practice. Primary registers are not sufficiently introduced into scientific circulation. The importance of the primary registers of 1577 also lies in the fact that they reflected the devastation of Volyn after the Tatar attacks of 1575 and 1577. The presence of primary (1570 and 1577) and general (1570, 1577, 1583, 1589) collections registers creates opportunities to examine the state and dynamics of the development of social and economic phenomena. Other sources of a descriptive and statistical nature are unknown for the Volyn estates of the princes of Ostroh of the second half of the 16th century. The most important feature of collections registers is the display of social indicators of the urban and rural populations. Documentation of a primary nature, which was created by order of the owners and related to individual estate complexes, contains a number of testimonies that were lost during the generalization. Such are the formulary characteristics and language of primary fiscal notes, the level of implementation of economic innovations, elements of the gender structure of the population, anthroponymy, names of owners, etc. Primary collections registers were introduced on the territory of Volyn at the end of 1569, and their registration did not have an established standard due to the lack of tradition and experience. The nature of filing tax statements into the registers also differed. These features, even in the registers created by the same domain office, differed significantly. Tax documentation of the estates of V.-K. Ostrozky has a sufficiently high territorial representativeness. The entirety of tax documentation constitutes a single source system, which requires the study of all its elements, including primary tax registers.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116267947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-66-73
T. Boriak
Notion of Holodomor as an invention of “Ukrainian nationalists” and “Nazis” circulated in world information sphere since the end of WWII. Gradually, with more oral history written, with more documents being declassified and more researches done, Holodomor reconstituted its place in Ukrainian historiography, collective memory and state commemorative traditions. The goal of the article is to reveal five vectors, and at the same time – means of Soviet/Russian propaganda, applied toward theme of the famine in the frames of the genocide denial instrument called «manipulation». These are: direct accusations of involvement into Nazism; deepening of mental abyss between free and Communist worlds; exploitation of a thesis “conquerors are not judged” as the result of the victory in WWII; legal proceedings; Sovietology studies. Weigh of each component varies and is of more or less power. The first proposed instrument had the most long-lasting and powerful effect. It basically tied the whole national Ukrainian movement and ideology to Nazism. Its consequences and echo were still visible till the beginning of full-scale war in 2022. The next three instruments were connected to WWII and thus their influence gradually weakened. Chairs of Sovietology, like the first vector, also remained strongholds of anti-Ukrainians and pro-Soviet/Russian imperial narrative till 2022, when many historians faced the necessity to rethink their previous assessments of Ukrainian history, including the Holodomor. Therefore, proposed by the author vectors and instruments used in propagandist campaign against the Holodomor both show their long-lasting influence and deconstruct the Soviet-Russian imperial myth.
{"title":"INFORMATION WAR OF THE USSR (1945 – BEGINNING OF 1980S): HOW PROPAGANDA TURNED TESTIMONIES OF UKRAINIANS ABOUT REPRESSIONS AND FAMINE OF 1932–1933 INTO “ADVENTURE NOVELS”","authors":"T. Boriak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-66-73","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-66-73","url":null,"abstract":"Notion of Holodomor as an invention of “Ukrainian nationalists” and “Nazis” circulated in world information sphere since the end of WWII. Gradually, with more oral history written, with more documents being declassified and more researches done, Holodomor reconstituted its place in Ukrainian historiography, collective memory and state commemorative traditions. The goal of the article is to reveal five vectors, and at the same time – means of Soviet/Russian propaganda, applied toward theme of the famine in the frames of the genocide denial instrument called «manipulation». These are: direct accusations of involvement into Nazism; deepening of mental abyss between free and Communist worlds; exploitation of a thesis “conquerors are not judged” as the result of the victory in WWII; legal proceedings; Sovietology studies. Weigh of each component varies and is of more or less power. The first proposed instrument had the most long-lasting and powerful effect. It basically tied the whole national Ukrainian movement and ideology to Nazism. Its consequences and echo were still visible till the beginning of full-scale war in 2022. The next three instruments were connected to WWII and thus their influence gradually weakened. Chairs of Sovietology, like the first vector, also remained strongholds of anti-Ukrainians and pro-Soviet/Russian imperial narrative till 2022, when many historians faced the necessity to rethink their previous assessments of Ukrainian history, including the Holodomor. Therefore, proposed by the author vectors and instruments used in propagandist campaign against the Holodomor both show their long-lasting influence and deconstruct the Soviet-Russian imperial myth.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128191407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-95-103
M. Stopchak
The article focuses on the study of modern national historiography regarding military-historical work in camps for interned soldiers of the Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. The methodological approaches of national historians to the coverage of this topic are characterized. Historiographical sources on the problem for 1993–2022 were identified, systematized and analyzed, and their classification was carried out. A comprehensive study of the sources made it possible to comprehensively analyze the historiographic work of modern national specialists regarding the main directions of the military-historical work of the State Center of the Ukrainian People's Republic in emigration in the camps for the interned Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. It is shown that the involvement of archival materials previously hidden in Soviet special repositories, the use of sources from foreign archives, museums, and private collections made it possible to raise the coverage of the problem outlined in the article to a higher level, which was evidenced by the appearance of a number of articles, brochures, monographs, and protected dissertations. In them, the researchers clearly formulated the reasons that forced the Government of the Ukrainian People’s Republic in exile to actively carry out military-historical work in the internment camps, and found out the objective and subjective factors that inhibited it. National historians characterized the measures of the military leadership of the UPR Army aimed at overcoming them, highlighted specific successes in this work, its impact on raising the morale and fighting spirit of interned Ukrainian soldiers. From historical oblivion, the names of many active participants in this activity – members of the State Party of the Ukrainian People's Republic, military personnel of various ranks, education and culture figures, ordinary Cossacks who ended up in internment camps – have been returned. It was noted that despite certain successes, some negative trends were also revealed in the coverage of military-historical work in the camps for the interned Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. In particular, the degree of activity in researching this issue varies. The first decade of the XXI century. is characterized by the development of many aspects of the specified problem, the printing of a number of publications of various genres. But in the period from 2001 to 2022, a kind of «historiographical pause» occurred in the development of research on the problem, which manifested itself in a decrease in the number of studies, the appearance of works with an impoverished historiographical base, a weak substantive and analytical component. The article shows that a number of aspects of the problem under consideration still require additional study. The basis for the successful implementation of this task is a significant expansion of the research source base, first of all, due to the development of the sources of the archive
{"title":"MILITARY HISTORICAL WORK IN CAMPS FOR INTERNED SOLDIERS OF THE UPR ARMY: CONTEMPORARY NATIONWIDE HISTORIOGRAPHY","authors":"M. Stopchak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-95-103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-95-103","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the study of modern national historiography regarding military-historical work in camps for interned soldiers of the Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. The methodological approaches of national historians to the coverage of this topic are characterized. Historiographical sources on the problem for 1993–2022 were identified, systematized and analyzed, and their classification was carried out. A comprehensive study of the sources made it possible to comprehensively analyze the historiographic work of modern national specialists regarding the main directions of the military-historical work of the State Center of the Ukrainian People's Republic in emigration in the camps for the interned Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. It is shown that the involvement of archival materials previously hidden in Soviet special repositories, the use of sources from foreign archives, museums, and private collections made it possible to raise the coverage of the problem outlined in the article to a higher level, which was evidenced by the appearance of a number of articles, brochures, monographs, and protected dissertations. In them, the researchers clearly formulated the reasons that forced the Government of the Ukrainian People’s Republic in exile to actively carry out military-historical work in the internment camps, and found out the objective and subjective factors that inhibited it. National historians characterized the measures of the military leadership of the UPR Army aimed at overcoming them, highlighted specific successes in this work, its impact on raising the morale and fighting spirit of interned Ukrainian soldiers. From historical oblivion, the names of many active participants in this activity – members of the State Party of the Ukrainian People's Republic, military personnel of various ranks, education and culture figures, ordinary Cossacks who ended up in internment camps – have been returned. It was noted that despite certain successes, some negative trends were also revealed in the coverage of military-historical work in the camps for the interned Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic. In particular, the degree of activity in researching this issue varies. The first decade of the XXI century. is characterized by the development of many aspects of the specified problem, the printing of a number of publications of various genres. But in the period from 2001 to 2022, a kind of «historiographical pause» occurred in the development of research on the problem, which manifested itself in a decrease in the number of studies, the appearance of works with an impoverished historiographical base, a weak substantive and analytical component. The article shows that a number of aspects of the problem under consideration still require additional study. The basis for the successful implementation of this task is a significant expansion of the research source base, first of all, due to the development of the sources of the archive","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"1997 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117026512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-128-137
Volodymyr Marchuk
The article examines the administrative and territorial changes that took place in the Volyn voivodeship in the interwar period. Changes in the territorial division of voivodeships became the subject of numerous discussions, the participants of which emphasized that the division into voivodeships built in 1919–1921 was imperfect and did not meet the needs of state administration and economic challenges. Most projects were presented in the 1920s in connection with the activities of three governmental and parliamentary commissions that worked on the concept of territorial division. The voivodships of the Second Polish Republic were very diverse in terms of area, population, population density, and level of economic development. Volyn voivodeship was economically and financially weak and could not withstand investment challenges, especially in terms of infrastructure, like most voivodeships. Most of the proposed changes in the administrative-territorial structure of the Volyn voivodeship concerned either the northern territories bordering the Polish voivodeship, or the western territories adjacent to the Lublin Region, but most of these proposals were not implemented. The only significant change in the territorial structure of the interwar Volhynia voivodeship was the inclusion of the Sarny County. At the same time, throughout the interwar period, internal changes took place in the administrative and territorial structure of the voivodeship.
{"title":"VOLYN VOIVODESHIP IN THE SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC: FROM THE HISTORY OF TERRITORIAL CHANGES, 1921-1939","authors":"Volodymyr Marchuk","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-128-137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-128-137","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the administrative and territorial changes that took place in the Volyn voivodeship in the interwar period. Changes in the territorial division of voivodeships became the subject of numerous discussions, the participants of which emphasized that the division into voivodeships built in 1919–1921 was imperfect and did not meet the needs of state administration and economic challenges. Most projects were presented in the 1920s in connection with the activities of three governmental and parliamentary commissions that worked on the concept of territorial division. The voivodships of the Second Polish Republic were very diverse in terms of area, population, population density, and level of economic development. Volyn voivodeship was economically and financially weak and could not withstand investment challenges, especially in terms of infrastructure, like most voivodeships. Most of the proposed changes in the administrative-territorial structure of the Volyn voivodeship concerned either the northern territories bordering the Polish voivodeship, or the western territories adjacent to the Lublin Region, but most of these proposals were not implemented. The only significant change in the territorial structure of the interwar Volhynia voivodeship was the inclusion of the Sarny County. At the same time, throughout the interwar period, internal changes took place in the administrative and territorial structure of the voivodeship.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123689077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：