New directions in measurement for software quality control

Paul Krause, B. Freimut, W. Suryn
{"title":"New directions in measurement for software quality control","authors":"Paul Krause, B. Freimut, W. Suryn","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2002.1267623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing and controlling software quality is still an immature discipline. One of the reasons for this is that many of the concepts and terms that are used in discussing and describing quality are overloaded with a history from manufacturing quality. We argue in this paper that a quite distinct approach is needed to software quality control as compared with manufacturing quality control. In particular, the emphasis in software quality control is in design to fulfill business needs, rather than replication to agreed standards. We will describe how quality goals can be derived from business needs. Following that, we will introduce an approach to quality control that uses rich causal models, which can take into account human as well as technological influences. A significant concern of developing such models is the limited sample sizes that are available for eliciting model parameters. In the final section of the paper we will show how expert judgment can be reliably used to elicit parameters in the absence of statistical data. In total this provides an agenda for developing a framework for quality control in software engineering that is freed from the shackles of an inappropriate legacy.","PeriodicalId":271935,"journal":{"name":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2002.1267623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Assessing and controlling software quality is still an immature discipline. One of the reasons for this is that many of the concepts and terms that are used in discussing and describing quality are overloaded with a history from manufacturing quality. We argue in this paper that a quite distinct approach is needed to software quality control as compared with manufacturing quality control. In particular, the emphasis in software quality control is in design to fulfill business needs, rather than replication to agreed standards. We will describe how quality goals can be derived from business needs. Following that, we will introduce an approach to quality control that uses rich causal models, which can take into account human as well as technological influences. A significant concern of developing such models is the limited sample sizes that are available for eliciting model parameters. In the final section of the paper we will show how expert judgment can be reliably used to elicit parameters in the absence of statistical data. In total this provides an agenda for developing a framework for quality control in software engineering that is freed from the shackles of an inappropriate legacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件质量控制测量的新方向
评估和控制软件质量仍然是一门不成熟的学科。其中一个原因是,在讨论和描述质量时使用的许多概念和术语都与制造质量的历史有关。我们在本文中认为,与制造质量控制相比,软件质量控制需要一种截然不同的方法。特别是,软件质量控制的重点在于满足业务需求的设计,而不是按照商定的标准进行复制。我们将描述如何从业务需求中获得质量目标。接下来,我们将介绍一种使用丰富因果模型的质量控制方法,它可以考虑人为和技术的影响。开发这种模型的一个重要问题是可用于得出模型参数的有限样本量。在本文的最后一部分,我们将展示如何在没有统计数据的情况下可靠地使用专家判断来引出参数。总的来说,这为开发软件工程中的质量控制框架提供了一个议程,该框架从不适当的遗留的束缚中解放出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the role of services in enterprise application integration Thirteen Knights and the Seven-headed Dragon: an interdisciplinary software engineering framework STEP2002: advances and opportunities in software engineering practice Workshop on COTS integration and evaluation Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1