Distinguishing “Religion”. Variants of Differentiation and the Emergence of “Religion” as a Global Category in Modern Asia

A. Hermann
{"title":"Distinguishing “Religion”. Variants of Differentiation and the Emergence of “Religion” as a Global Category in Modern Asia","authors":"A. Hermann","doi":"10.1515/sosys-2018-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The existence of religious diversity is mostly taken for granted in today’s world society. Despite all apparent differences, however, world society theory proposes the hypothesis of a single function system of religion. At the same time, in the case of religion a process of semantic unification is highly disputed. Until recently, such debates had not paid much attention to the “translingual practice” (Liu) that has produced “religion” as a global category over the last two hundred years. Drawing on recent studies, this article traces some semantic transformations in regard to “religion” in 19th and early 20th century Asia and highlights the importance of three contested distinctions connected with “religion”. It also relates these semantic changes to recent debates about the differentiation of religion in theories of secularization. Any visibility of regional differences in the religious system of modern world society should be understood as the result of the emergence of this global category. Such a focus on semantics highlights the way in which speaking of “religion” as a specific instance of “culture” in world society becomes possible and “religion” becomes observable to itself and from the outside only as a result of these transformations.","PeriodicalId":384994,"journal":{"name":"Soziale Systeme","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziale Systeme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2018-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The existence of religious diversity is mostly taken for granted in today’s world society. Despite all apparent differences, however, world society theory proposes the hypothesis of a single function system of religion. At the same time, in the case of religion a process of semantic unification is highly disputed. Until recently, such debates had not paid much attention to the “translingual practice” (Liu) that has produced “religion” as a global category over the last two hundred years. Drawing on recent studies, this article traces some semantic transformations in regard to “religion” in 19th and early 20th century Asia and highlights the importance of three contested distinctions connected with “religion”. It also relates these semantic changes to recent debates about the differentiation of religion in theories of secularization. Any visibility of regional differences in the religious system of modern world society should be understood as the result of the emergence of this global category. Such a focus on semantics highlights the way in which speaking of “religion” as a specific instance of “culture” in world society becomes possible and “religion” becomes observable to itself and from the outside only as a result of these transformations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“宗教”的区别。现代亚洲“宗教”作为一个全球范畴的出现与分化的变体
在当今世界社会,宗教多样性的存在在很大程度上被认为是理所当然的。然而,尽管存在所有明显的差异,世界社会理论提出了宗教单一功能系统的假设。同时,在宗教的情况下,一个语义统一的过程是高度争议的。直到最近,这样的争论还没有关注“翻译实践”(刘),在过去的200年里,“宗教”已经成为一个全球性的范畴。本文以最近的研究为基础,追溯了19世纪和20世纪初亚洲关于“宗教”的一些语义转换,并强调了与“宗教”相关的三个有争议的区别的重要性。它还将这些语义变化与最近关于世俗化理论中宗教差异的争论联系起来。现代世界社会宗教制度中任何明显的区域差异都应被理解为这一全球类别出现的结果。这种对语义学的关注突出了将“宗教”作为世界社会中“文化”的具体实例来谈论成为可能的方式,并且“宗教”只有作为这些转变的结果才能从自身和外部观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distinction Dynamics: A Form Analysis of Self-Descriptions in Agile Teams „Existenz ist eine selektive Blindheit“: Gegenstandsphilosophische Motive der Mathematik George Spencer-Browns Spencer-Brown, Luhmann and Klein on Symmetry Die Gesetze der Form aus der Sicht kategorientheoretischer Methoden Einleitung: Arbeit an der Form
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1