La opinión consultiva como herramienta para la uniformización de la interpretación y aplicación del derecho del MERCOSUR, en la temática migratoria

Luciane Klein Vieira, Vitória Régia Rêgo da Costa
{"title":"La opinión consultiva como herramienta para la uniformización de la interpretación y aplicación del derecho del MERCOSUR, en la temática migratoria","authors":"Luciane Klein Vieira, Vitória Régia Rêgo da Costa","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MERCOSUR, in the attempt to form a common market, has as its objective the free movement of people. As the region, historically, has high migratory mobility, whether from intra or extra bloc migrants, it was forced to produce a set of regulatory norms, having developed various measures for the strengthening of the free movement of people, promotion of citizenship and protection of the human rights of the migrant. In this regard, MERCOSUR has worked with the harmonization of national laws, seeking to reduce disparities in the treatment provided by the right of internal source. Given this scenario, and considering the increase in the internal flow of migrants, observed at present, the following research problem arises: is it possible to use the mechanism of advisory opinion, existing in MERCOSUR, for cases dealing with the movement of people, as a tool to standardize the interpretation and application of Mercosurean norms on the issue of migration and, consequently, strengthen the rights of migrants, in the block? To respond to the problem posed, the descriptive and historical normative methods were used, and as a research technique the bibliographic review and the documentary analysis. The response that has been reached says that in spite of the fact that there are still challenges related to the implementation and operation of the advisory opinion, it can be used as a suitable mechanism to promote the standardization of interpretation and attribute effectiveness to the intended rights, in the MERCOSUR rules related to the movement of people, strengthening regional integration, building trust and also deepening the human rights of migrants.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MERCOSUR, in the attempt to form a common market, has as its objective the free movement of people. As the region, historically, has high migratory mobility, whether from intra or extra bloc migrants, it was forced to produce a set of regulatory norms, having developed various measures for the strengthening of the free movement of people, promotion of citizenship and protection of the human rights of the migrant. In this regard, MERCOSUR has worked with the harmonization of national laws, seeking to reduce disparities in the treatment provided by the right of internal source. Given this scenario, and considering the increase in the internal flow of migrants, observed at present, the following research problem arises: is it possible to use the mechanism of advisory opinion, existing in MERCOSUR, for cases dealing with the movement of people, as a tool to standardize the interpretation and application of Mercosurean norms on the issue of migration and, consequently, strengthen the rights of migrants, in the block? To respond to the problem posed, the descriptive and historical normative methods were used, and as a research technique the bibliographic review and the documentary analysis. The response that has been reached says that in spite of the fact that there are still challenges related to the implementation and operation of the advisory opinion, it can be used as a suitable mechanism to promote the standardization of interpretation and attribute effectiveness to the intended rights, in the MERCOSUR rules related to the movement of people, strengthening regional integration, building trust and also deepening the human rights of migrants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协商意见作为统一南方共同市场关于移徙问题的法律解释和适用的工具
南方共同市场在试图形成一个共同市场的过程中,其目标是人民的自由流动。由于该区域在历史上具有很高的移徙流动性,无论是来自集团内部还是集团外部的移徙者,它被迫制定了一套管理准则,制定了各种措施,以加强人民的自由流动,促进公民身份和保护移徙者的人权。在这方面,南方共同市场致力于统一各国法律,力求减少内部来源权所提供待遇方面的差异。鉴于这种情况,并考虑到目前观察到的移徙者内部流动的增加,产生了以下研究问题:是否有可能利用南方共同市场现有的关于处理人口流动案件的咨询意见机制,作为一种工具,使南方共同市场关于移徙问题的准则的解释和适用标准化,从而加强该集团内移徙者的权利?为了回应所提出的问题,使用了描述性和历史规范性的方法,并作为一种研究技术的书目综述和文献分析。已达成的答复说,尽管咨询意见的执行和操作仍然存在挑战,但它可以作为一种适当的机制来促进解释的标准化,并将效力赋予南方共同市场规则中与人口流动、加强区域一体化、建立信任和深化移民人权有关的预期权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moeda única e moeda comum: Compreendendo a proposta de uma moeda regional no MERCOSUL La inminente reforma del sistema jurisdiccional de la Unión Europea Differences and similarities of the preliminary ruling procedure of the European Court of Justice, and the advisory opinion of the Permanent Tribunal of Revision of the Mercosur. The Mercosur Socio-Labour Declaration and the importance of judicial activism La naturaleza de la Unión Europea: la contienda entre las tres grandes concepciones y el progreso hacia un verdadero proyecto federal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1