Zanuridan (megrul-lazuridan) shetvisebuli leksik’uri erteulebis ponet’ikur-ponologiuri da semant’ik’uri adap’t’aciisatvis svanurshi /ზანურიდან (მეგრულ-ლაზურიდან) შეთვისებული ლექსიკური ერთეულების ფონეტიკურ-ფონოლოგიური და სემანტიკური ადაპტაციისათვის სვანურში [Phonetic, Phonological and Semantic Adapta

Medea Saghliani
{"title":"Zanuridan (megrul-lazuridan) shetvisebuli leksik’uri erteulebis ponet’ikur-ponologiuri da semant’ik’uri adap’t’aciisatvis svanurshi /ზანურიდან (მეგრულ-ლაზურიდან) შეთვისებული ლექსიკური ერთეულების ფონეტიკურ-ფონოლოგიური და სემანტიკური ადაპტაციისათვის სვანურში [Phonetic, Phonological and Semantic Adapta","authors":"Medea Saghliani","doi":"10.54635/tpks.2022.15putk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present article, which offers the analysis of phonetic-phonological and semantic transformations of several lexical units assimilated from Zan (resp. Megrelian-Laz) into Svan dialect-sub-dialects in different epochs and in different ways, in the footsteps of our research, all the opinions related to each analytical lexical unit, which are expressed in the academic literature by Georgian or foreign linguists, are taken into account. Naturally, the paper also focuses on material that is lost in Zan itself, although it is preserved in Svan, mainly in the Lower Bal dialect, which indicates the ancient borrowing of this material and, at the same time, its archaism.The lexical units assimilated from Zan, as the observation of the material demonstrated, are attested in Svan both phonetically-semantically unchanged, as well as with different phonetic variants or semantic nuances (modified data). Some of the borrowed roots are “Svanized”, it means they contain morphological inventory typical of Svan: palatal, velar or labial umlaut, long vowel, anaptyctic element, etc. In addition, the following phonetic processes are quite tangible in one part of the lexical units borrowed from Zan: sound alternation, reduction processes in light and hard forms, loss of sounds, etc.In Svan, several such stems (resp. root, morpheme, affix) have been identified, which are either missing or manifested in other forms in Zan. Clearly, such forms, which were presumably preserved by Svan as relics, indicate their ancient borrowing. In our opinion, revealing any archaic form will allow Georgian or foreign comparativists to restore many archetypes. We believe, such research is very important and interesting for presenting a general picture of the development of Svan phonological and lexical systems. \nსაკვანძო სიტყვები: ქართველური (ზანურ-სვანური) ლექსიკა, ფონეტიკური\nპროცესები სვანურში, სემანტიკური ცვლილებები.\nKeywords: Kartvelian (Zan-Svan) vocabulary, Phonetic processes in Svan, Semantic\nchanges.","PeriodicalId":272679,"journal":{"name":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54635/tpks.2022.15putk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present article, which offers the analysis of phonetic-phonological and semantic transformations of several lexical units assimilated from Zan (resp. Megrelian-Laz) into Svan dialect-sub-dialects in different epochs and in different ways, in the footsteps of our research, all the opinions related to each analytical lexical unit, which are expressed in the academic literature by Georgian or foreign linguists, are taken into account. Naturally, the paper also focuses on material that is lost in Zan itself, although it is preserved in Svan, mainly in the Lower Bal dialect, which indicates the ancient borrowing of this material and, at the same time, its archaism.The lexical units assimilated from Zan, as the observation of the material demonstrated, are attested in Svan both phonetically-semantically unchanged, as well as with different phonetic variants or semantic nuances (modified data). Some of the borrowed roots are “Svanized”, it means they contain morphological inventory typical of Svan: palatal, velar or labial umlaut, long vowel, anaptyctic element, etc. In addition, the following phonetic processes are quite tangible in one part of the lexical units borrowed from Zan: sound alternation, reduction processes in light and hard forms, loss of sounds, etc.In Svan, several such stems (resp. root, morpheme, affix) have been identified, which are either missing or manifested in other forms in Zan. Clearly, such forms, which were presumably preserved by Svan as relics, indicate their ancient borrowing. In our opinion, revealing any archaic form will allow Georgian or foreign comparativists to restore many archetypes. We believe, such research is very important and interesting for presenting a general picture of the development of Svan phonological and lexical systems. საკვანძო სიტყვები: ქართველური (ზანურ-სვანური) ლექსიკა, ფონეტიკური პროცესები სვანურში, სემანტიკური ცვლილებები. Keywords: Kartvelian (Zan-Svan) vocabulary, Phonetic processes in Svan, Semantic changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文分析了从赞语中吸收的几个词汇单位的音韵和语义转换。在我们研究的脚步中,格鲁吉亚或外国语言学家在学术文献中表达的与每个分析词汇单位相关的所有意见都被考虑在内。当然,这篇论文也关注了在赞本身丢失的材料,尽管它在斯万保存下来,主要是下巴尔方言,这表明这些材料是古代借用的,同时也是它的古语。根据对材料的观察,从Zan中吸收的词汇单位在Svan中既没有语音语义上的变化,也有不同的语音变体或语义上的细微差别(修改数据)。一些外来根是“斯瓦尼化”的,这意味着它们包含了斯瓦尼语的典型形态学特征:腭、腭或唇部变音、长元音、全音元素等。此外,在从赞语中借来的词汇单位中,有以下几个语音过程是相当明显的:音的交替、轻音和硬音的略读过程、音的丢失等。词根、语素、词缀)已被识别,这些词根或缺失或以其他形式在瓒中表现出来。显然,这些可能被斯万作为遗迹保存下来的形式表明它们是古代借用的。在我们看来,揭示任何古老的形式将允许格鲁吉亚或外国比较学家恢复许多原型。我们相信,这样的研究对于呈现斯万语语音和词汇系统发展的总体图景是非常重要和有趣的。საკვანძოსიტყვები:ქართველური(ზანურ——სვანური)ლექსიკა,ფონეტიკურიპროცესებისვანურში,სემანტიკურიცვლილებები。关键词:卡特维尔语词汇,斯旺语语音过程,语义变化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simbolist’uri kalakis mxat’vrul-msoplmxedvelobrivi ret’rosp’ekt’iva Sandro cirekidzis miniat’urebshi /სიმბოლისტური ქალაქის მხატვრულ-მსოფლმხედველობრივი რეტროსპექტივა სანდრო ცირეკიძის მინიატურებში [Artistic-Worldview Retrospective of Symbolist Сity in Miniatures by Sandro Tsirekidze] C’anarta c’armomavlobisatvis /წანართა წარმომავლობისათვის [For the Structure of The Noun c̕anar] Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage] P’olipunkciuri –d kartulshi da ughvlilebis morposint’aksuri modelebi /პოლიფუნქციური -დ- ქართულში და უღვლილების მორფოსინტაქსური მოდელები [Polyfunctional -d- in Georgian and Morphosyntactic Models of Conjugation] T’ransregionuli da regionuli maksimebi da enatmecniereba (kartuli samc’ignobro enis sivrce) /ტრანსრეგიონული და რეგიონული მაქსიმები და ენათმეცნიერება (ქართული სამწიგნობრო ენის სივრცე) [Transregional and Regional Maxims and Linguistics (Georgian Literary Language Space)]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1