The 16th Venice Architecture Biennale celebrates the triumph of the ancient régime, but la lutte continue

P. Somma
{"title":"The 16th Venice Architecture Biennale celebrates the triumph of the ancient régime, but la lutte continue","authors":"P. Somma","doi":"10.1386/aps_00004_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1968 many intellectuals took to Piazza San Marco to express solidarity with the students of the Venice Academy of Fine Arts who were demonstrating against the Biennale and had been attacked for four hours by the police. In 2018 the same square was patrolled by\n armed troops deployed to 'protect the tourists' who occupied the city and there was no sign of protests against the Biennale. On the day of inauguration, the only voice of dissent was that of some citizens claiming their right 'to live here'. No trace of intellectuals. Many of the old protesters\n have made a comfortable career while the invited artists to the international exhibition have uncritically responded to the call of this year's Architecture Biennale, whose title is 'FREESPACE', without questioning the prevailing paradigm in which 'free' means 'space cleared from citizens\n and offered as a gift to financial investors'. Only a few national pavilions have adopted a more articulate attitude that might recall some of the May '68 aspirations. Retracing the events that transformed a public cultural institution into an enterprise at the service of the art market and\n a powerful agent of the gentrification and Disneyfication of Venice over the last 50 years, this article focuses on the role played by the Architecture Biennale in the process. It also highlights the few contributions that in 2018 challenged the dominant narrative by explicitly referring to\n the notion and practice of conflict.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00004_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In 1968 many intellectuals took to Piazza San Marco to express solidarity with the students of the Venice Academy of Fine Arts who were demonstrating against the Biennale and had been attacked for four hours by the police. In 2018 the same square was patrolled by armed troops deployed to 'protect the tourists' who occupied the city and there was no sign of protests against the Biennale. On the day of inauguration, the only voice of dissent was that of some citizens claiming their right 'to live here'. No trace of intellectuals. Many of the old protesters have made a comfortable career while the invited artists to the international exhibition have uncritically responded to the call of this year's Architecture Biennale, whose title is 'FREESPACE', without questioning the prevailing paradigm in which 'free' means 'space cleared from citizens and offered as a gift to financial investors'. Only a few national pavilions have adopted a more articulate attitude that might recall some of the May '68 aspirations. Retracing the events that transformed a public cultural institution into an enterprise at the service of the art market and a powerful agent of the gentrification and Disneyfication of Venice over the last 50 years, this article focuses on the role played by the Architecture Biennale in the process. It also highlights the few contributions that in 2018 challenged the dominant narrative by explicitly referring to the notion and practice of conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第16届威尼斯建筑双年展庆祝了古代建筑的胜利,但la lutte仍在继续
1968年,许多知识分子走上圣马可广场,表达对威尼斯美术学院学生的声援,这些学生抗议双年展,并被警察袭击了四个小时。2018年,为了“保护占领这座城市的游客”,武装部队在同一广场巡逻,没有任何抗议双年展的迹象。在就职典礼当天,唯一的异议声音是一些公民声称他们有权“住在这里”。没有知识分子的踪迹。许多老抗议者已经有了一个舒适的职业生涯,而受邀参加国际展览的艺术家们则不加批判地回应了今年建筑双年展的呼吁,该展览的标题是“自由空间”,而没有质疑“自由”意味着“从公民手中腾出空间并作为礼物提供给金融投资者”的流行范式。只有少数国家馆采取了更明确的态度,这可能会让人想起1968年5月的一些愿望。在过去的50年里,一个公共文化机构转变为为艺术市场服务的企业,并成为威尼斯中产阶级化和迪斯尼化的有力代理人,本文将重点关注建筑双年展在这一过程中所扮演的角色。它还强调了2018年通过明确提到冲突的概念和实践挑战主流叙事的少数贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art, politics, pedagogy: Juxtaposing, discomfiting, disrupting The case for creative folklore in pedagogical practice Paying it forward to end period poverty in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Pedagogies and politics of care, community, and academic activism Teaching urban spaces and world politics: Perdido Street Station and pedagogies of production Conflictual sociability? A paradoxical approach to politicized street theatre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1