{"title":"A Voluntary Tax? Revisited","authors":"Edward J. McCaffery","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.269352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article explains, updates and generalizes Cooper (1979), which had labeled the estate tax a voluntary tax. The tax has remained \"voluntary\" in the sense of being easily avoidable, even by those engaging in activities within the tax's ostensible normative target (i.e., significant intergenerational wealth transfers). Further, all taxes on the yield to capital are voluntary in this sense. The federal tax system, writ large, is increasingly a wage-based tax. Citizens who own large stores of capital can live - and die - tax-free using common tax planning techniques. These facts ought to call the normative justification for the status quo, including the estate tax, into question. A consistent progressive cash flow tax - without a separate estate tax - is a far better, more consistent tax on both the yield to capital and inheritance than is the present, highly flawed, income plus estate tax.","PeriodicalId":390004,"journal":{"name":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.269352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This Article explains, updates and generalizes Cooper (1979), which had labeled the estate tax a voluntary tax. The tax has remained "voluntary" in the sense of being easily avoidable, even by those engaging in activities within the tax's ostensible normative target (i.e., significant intergenerational wealth transfers). Further, all taxes on the yield to capital are voluntary in this sense. The federal tax system, writ large, is increasingly a wage-based tax. Citizens who own large stores of capital can live - and die - tax-free using common tax planning techniques. These facts ought to call the normative justification for the status quo, including the estate tax, into question. A consistent progressive cash flow tax - without a separate estate tax - is a far better, more consistent tax on both the yield to capital and inheritance than is the present, highly flawed, income plus estate tax.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自愿纳税?重新审视
本文对库珀(1979)将遗产税定义为一种自愿税的观点进行了解释、更新和概括。从很容易避免的意义上说,这种税一直是“自愿的”,即使是那些从事这种税表面上的规范目标范围内的活动(即重大的代际财富转移)的人也是如此。此外,从这个意义上说,所有对资本收益率征税都是自愿的。显而易见,联邦税收体系正日益成为一种以工资为基础的税收。拥有大量资本的公民可以使用常见的税收规划技术来实现终身免税。这些事实应该让包括遗产税在内的维持现状的规范性理由受到质疑。与目前存在严重缺陷的收入加遗产税相比,一致的累进现金流税——不单独征收遗产税——对资本收益率和遗产税都是一种更好、更一致的税收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Juror Decision Making: An Empathic Inquiry Adjudication of the GATT Security Clause: To Be or Not to Be, This is the Question Opportunistic Proposals by Union Shareholders Agency Performance Challenges and Agency Politicization It's Tax Not Trade (Stupid)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1