Eye-Tracking in STEM Education Research: Limitations, Experiences and Possible Extensions

Prajakt Pande, S. Chandrasekharan
{"title":"Eye-Tracking in STEM Education Research: Limitations, Experiences and Possible Extensions","authors":"Prajakt Pande, S. Chandrasekharan","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2014.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eye-tracking technology is being increasingly used in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education research. However, most available eye-tracking devices are oriented towards research problems focusing on attention, particularly in areas such as advertising, linguistics, human factors, human-computer interaction, training simulators, sports and virtual reality. Problems in these areas are fundamentally different from those in STEM education, where attention is only one of the many important variables in teaching-learning. Since learning is a process happening over time, STEM investigations focus on understanding the learning process, and this requires moving beyond attention information, doing sophisticated analysis of fixation data, and ways of collecting richer data that support such process analysis. In this paper, we present our difficulties and experiences in using standard eye-tracking systems to understand the learning process. We also describe some new methods developed to collect and analyze process data, and propose several possible extensions to eye tracking systems that would make eye tracking more useful for STEM education research.","PeriodicalId":151911,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2014.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Eye-tracking technology is being increasingly used in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education research. However, most available eye-tracking devices are oriented towards research problems focusing on attention, particularly in areas such as advertising, linguistics, human factors, human-computer interaction, training simulators, sports and virtual reality. Problems in these areas are fundamentally different from those in STEM education, where attention is only one of the many important variables in teaching-learning. Since learning is a process happening over time, STEM investigations focus on understanding the learning process, and this requires moving beyond attention information, doing sophisticated analysis of fixation data, and ways of collecting richer data that support such process analysis. In this paper, we present our difficulties and experiences in using standard eye-tracking systems to understand the learning process. We also describe some new methods developed to collect and analyze process data, and propose several possible extensions to eye tracking systems that would make eye tracking more useful for STEM education research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM教育研究中的眼动追踪:局限性、经验和可能的扩展
眼动追踪技术在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育研究中得到越来越多的应用。然而,大多数可用的眼动追踪设备都是面向专注于注意力的研究问题,特别是在广告、语言学、人为因素、人机交互、训练模拟器、体育和虚拟现实等领域。这些领域的问题与STEM教育中的问题有着根本的不同,在STEM教育中,注意力只是教与学的众多重要变量之一。由于学习是一个随时间发生的过程,STEM调查的重点是理解学习过程,这需要超越注意力信息,对固定数据进行复杂的分析,以及收集支持这种过程分析的更丰富数据的方法。在本文中,我们介绍了使用标准眼动追踪系统来理解学习过程的困难和经验。我们还描述了一些用于收集和分析过程数据的新方法,并提出了眼动追踪系统的几个可能的扩展,这些扩展将使眼动追踪对STEM教育研究更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Any Time Virtual Labs: On Portable Media and as Debian Packages Fair and Non-repudiable Protocol for Exchange of E-examination Question Paper and Answer-Scripts NaVaSH: Examination Software for ICT Based Institutions A Self Study Learning Environment for Modeling Abilities: Do All Learners Take the Same Learning Path? Beyond interfaces: Understanding the Process of Designing Grassroots technologies, to Develop Sustainability Case Studies for Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1