Comparative legal analysis of the prosecutor’s activity in administrative and civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan

A.E. Alibekov, D.B. Umargaliyev
{"title":"Comparative legal analysis of the prosecutor’s activity in administrative and civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan","authors":"A.E. Alibekov, D.B. Umargaliyev","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2022-138-1-155-168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he relevance of studying the legal nature of the development, forms and legal status of the prosecutor’s participation in administrative and civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan (hereinafter referred to as the ROK) is due to the presence of practical and scientific figures seeking to abolish this institution, imitating the legal system of European countries, as well as the introduction of the Administrative Procedural Code of the ROK (hereinafter referred to as the APPC). The article draws a parallel between the participation of the prosecutor in administrative and civil proceedings, the existing differences and similarities, in particular, describes the possible forms of participation of the prosecutor in court, touches on the issue of the legal status of the prosecutor, the difference of rights and obligations from other participants in the process. The purpose of the work is to study the institution of participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings. The proposals put forward in science to improve the activities of the prosecutor’s office are considered. It is concluded that the APPC grants individuals and legal entities the right to appeal against the actions and inaction of not only state bodies, local self-government bodies or organizations with state participation, but also other organizations with private ownership. The authors believe that the participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings should not be limited only to this direction, he is also obliged to respond to other violations identified in the process. In accordance with the legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, it is delimited and confirmed that, in addition to the supervisory functions of the prosecutor, there is a purpose for representing the interests of the state in court. It is proposed to unify the notification of various forms of participation of the prosecutor in the administrative process, to describe in one norm all forms of participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings.","PeriodicalId":300299,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2022-138-1-155-168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

he relevance of studying the legal nature of the development, forms and legal status of the prosecutor’s participation in administrative and civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan (hereinafter referred to as the ROK) is due to the presence of practical and scientific figures seeking to abolish this institution, imitating the legal system of European countries, as well as the introduction of the Administrative Procedural Code of the ROK (hereinafter referred to as the APPC). The article draws a parallel between the participation of the prosecutor in administrative and civil proceedings, the existing differences and similarities, in particular, describes the possible forms of participation of the prosecutor in court, touches on the issue of the legal status of the prosecutor, the difference of rights and obligations from other participants in the process. The purpose of the work is to study the institution of participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings. The proposals put forward in science to improve the activities of the prosecutor’s office are considered. It is concluded that the APPC grants individuals and legal entities the right to appeal against the actions and inaction of not only state bodies, local self-government bodies or organizations with state participation, but also other organizations with private ownership. The authors believe that the participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings should not be limited only to this direction, he is also obliged to respond to other violations identified in the process. In accordance with the legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, it is delimited and confirmed that, in addition to the supervisory functions of the prosecutor, there is a purpose for representing the interests of the state in court. It is proposed to unify the notification of various forms of participation of the prosecutor in the administrative process, to describe in one norm all forms of participation of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈萨克斯坦共和国行政和民事诉讼中检察官活动的比较法律分析
研究哈萨克斯坦共和国(以下简称“大韩民国”)检察官参与行政和民事诉讼的发展、形式和法律地位的法律性质之所以有意义,是因为有实践和科学人士试图模仿欧洲国家的法律制度废除这一制度,以及大韩民国《行政诉讼法》(以下简称“大韩民国”)的出台。本文对检察官参与行政诉讼和民事诉讼进行了比较,指出了两者之间存在的异同,特别是描述了检察官参与法庭的可能形式,触及了检察官的法律地位问题,以及检察官在诉讼过程中与其他参与人的权利和义务的区别。这项工作的目的是研究检察官参与行政诉讼的制度。科学地提出了改进检察机关活动的建议。结论是,APPC不仅赋予个人和法人对国家机关、地方自治机关或国家参与组织的作为和不作为提出申诉的权利,而且还赋予其他私有制组织的作为和不作为提出申诉的权利。作者认为,检察官参与行政诉讼不应仅限于这一方向,他也有义务对这一过程中查明的其他违法行为作出反应。根据哈萨克斯坦共和国的法律规定,除了检察官的监督职能外,还有在法庭上代表国家利益的目的,这一点得到了界定和确认。建议将检察官参与行政程序的各种形式的通知统一起来,将检察官参与行政程序的各种形式统一在一个规范中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal regulation of labor discrimination in the Republic of Kazakhstan Analysis of Kazakhstan legislation regulating the labour of medical and pharmaceutical workers Regional cooperation and prospects for the development of Central Asia and Kazakhstan in the field of children’s rights Problems of improving the professional legal culture of civil servants Corruption risks in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1