Evaluating Performance of NBA Players with Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Messages

Qiwen Li, Jiarui Zhang, Jiayu Guo, Jiaqi Li, Chenhao Kang
{"title":"Evaluating Performance of NBA Players with Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Messages","authors":"Qiwen Li, Jiarui Zhang, Jiayu Guo, Jiaqi Li, Chenhao Kang","doi":"10.1145/3501774.3501796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, we conduct polls to obtain people's opinions on certain subjects, but now as social media prevails, scientists can harvest people's opinions from the great amount of data generated from social media users. This paper performs sentiment analysis on the Twitter comments regarding NBA games to obtain public opinions on the NBA players as a new way of player-performance evaluation, instead of adopting the traditional way to assess players according to their statistics in the games or the poll results by the audience. The Twitter messages regarding 5 games during the 2019 NBA playoff finals are collected, and three types of sentiments (absolute, objective, and subjective sentiments) are extracted from these messages. This work explores which type of sentiment has the strongest correlation with the player performance and thus makes the best value to evaluate the player performance. Keywords are also extracted from the messages. Our findings suggest that subjective sentiment is the best value among the three types of sentiments.","PeriodicalId":255059,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3501774.3501796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, we conduct polls to obtain people's opinions on certain subjects, but now as social media prevails, scientists can harvest people's opinions from the great amount of data generated from social media users. This paper performs sentiment analysis on the Twitter comments regarding NBA games to obtain public opinions on the NBA players as a new way of player-performance evaluation, instead of adopting the traditional way to assess players according to their statistics in the games or the poll results by the audience. The Twitter messages regarding 5 games during the 2019 NBA playoff finals are collected, and three types of sentiments (absolute, objective, and subjective sentiments) are extracted from these messages. This work explores which type of sentiment has the strongest correlation with the player performance and thus makes the best value to evaluate the player performance. Keywords are also extracted from the messages. Our findings suggest that subjective sentiment is the best value among the three types of sentiments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用推特信息情感分析评价NBA球员的表现
传统上,我们通过民意调查来获取人们对某些主题的意见,但现在随着社交媒体的盛行,科学家可以从社交媒体用户产生的大量数据中收集人们的意见。本文通过对NBA比赛的Twitter评论进行情感分析,以获取公众对NBA球员的评价,这是一种新的球员表现评价方式,而不是传统的根据球员在比赛中的统计数据或观众的投票结果来评价球员。收集了2019年NBA季后赛5场比赛的推特信息,从中提取了绝对情绪、客观情绪和主观情绪三种情绪。这项工作探讨了哪种类型的情绪与玩家表现的相关性最强,从而为评估玩家表现创造了最佳价值。还从消息中提取关键字。我们的研究结果表明,主观情绪是三种情绪中最具价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Customer Satisfaction in Software Development Projects A Lightweight Development of Outbreak Prevention Strategies Built on Formal Methods and xDSLs An Exploratory Teaching Proposal of Greek History Independence Events based on STEAM Epistemology, Educational Robotics and Smart Learning Technologies Merging Live Video Feeds for Remote Monitoring of a Mining Machine Incorporating energy efficiency measurement into CI\CD pipeline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1