Duty of Fair Presentation after the Enactment of the Insurance Act 2015: The Case of Korea and China

Tae-Kun Ahn, S. Kim, Tian Peng
{"title":"Duty of Fair Presentation after the Enactment of the Insurance Act 2015: The Case of Korea and China","authors":"Tae-Kun Ahn, S. Kim, Tian Peng","doi":"10.35611/JKT.2020.24.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions and related caselaw of the Insurance Act 2015 to gain a clearer understanding of the differences between the Act and the preceding legislation. <br><br>Design/methodology – The authors analyzed caselaw from South Korea and China that involved breaches of the duty of disclosure. Cases highlighting differences between the duties of disclosure and fair presentation were selected. <br><br>Findings – Changes in the practice of marine insurance laws are expected from the application of the reformed duty of presentation provisions. In particular, the rights of the insured are expected to increase, resulting in the fairer conduct of insurance contracts. Due to the fact that the Insurance Act 2015 has only recently taken effect, the provisions of existing caselaw have not yet been applied. This has limited the authors’ scope of analysis. <br><br>Originality/value – This paper describes the implications of the duty of fair presentation by analyzing caselaw from South Korea and China that involves the duty of disclosure. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions of the Insurance Act 2015 in the context of the legislation’s implications for trade practices.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35611/JKT.2020.24.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions and related caselaw of the Insurance Act 2015 to gain a clearer understanding of the differences between the Act and the preceding legislation.

Design/methodology – The authors analyzed caselaw from South Korea and China that involved breaches of the duty of disclosure. Cases highlighting differences between the duties of disclosure and fair presentation were selected.

Findings – Changes in the practice of marine insurance laws are expected from the application of the reformed duty of presentation provisions. In particular, the rights of the insured are expected to increase, resulting in the fairer conduct of insurance contracts. Due to the fact that the Insurance Act 2015 has only recently taken effect, the provisions of existing caselaw have not yet been applied. This has limited the authors’ scope of analysis.

Originality/value – This paper describes the implications of the duty of fair presentation by analyzing caselaw from South Korea and China that involves the duty of disclosure. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions of the Insurance Act 2015 in the context of the legislation’s implications for trade practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015年《保险法》制定后的公平提示义务:以韩国和中国为例
目的-本文的目的是分析2015年保险法改革后的公平列报义务条款和相关判例法,以更清楚地了解该法案与之前立法的差异。设计/方法-作者分析了韩国和中国涉及违反披露义务的案例法。选择了突出披露义务和公平列报义务之间差异的案例。调查结果-预计海上保险法的实践将因实施改革后的提示义务规定而发生变化。特别是,被保险人的权利有望增加,从而使保险合同的行为更加公平。由于《2015年保险法》最近才生效,现有判例法的规定尚未适用。这限制了作者的分析范围。原创性/价值-本文通过分析韩国和中国涉及披露义务的判例法,描述了公平陈述义务的含义。据作者所知,这是第一篇在《2015年保险法》对贸易实践影响的背景下调查改革后的公平列报义务条款的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox The Impact of Foreign Slowdown on the U.S. Economy: An Open Economy DSGE Perspective Explaining the Limits of the WTO in Shaping the Rule of Law in China Economic Development through Migration - Facilitating Skilled Migration to China through the Belt and Road Initiative The Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs: Contributing to the Grotian Moment in Asia:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1