Comparison Study of Outcomes of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation before and after Korean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) System: Single Center Experience

J. A. Lee, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, C. Kwon, J. Joh
{"title":"Comparison Study of Outcomes of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation before and after Korean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) System: Single Center Experience","authors":"J. A. Lee, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, C. Kwon, J. Joh","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Korea. This study was conducted to reveal the changes before and after the MELD system. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2017, 71 patient datapoints were collected from recipients who underwent DDLT in a single center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the allocation system (41 in the MELD group, 30 in the CTP group). Results: The MELD score of the two groups differed significantly (36.8±4.5 in the MELD group, 26.0±8.1 in the CTP group, P=0.001). There was no difference in etiology for liver transplantation, 6-month survival rate, or in-hospital stay. However, complication rate and re-admission rate within the first 3 months were higher in the MELD group (78%, 56%). No one received a DDLT because of an incentive system for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: Despite the short-term follow-up period, the new allocation rule reflects the severity of the patients. Almost all patients who underwent DDLT when they had a high MELD score and then suffered from morbidity; however, this problem was associated with organ shortage, not the allocation system.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Korea. This study was conducted to reveal the changes before and after the MELD system. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2017, 71 patient datapoints were collected from recipients who underwent DDLT in a single center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the allocation system (41 in the MELD group, 30 in the CTP group). Results: The MELD score of the two groups differed significantly (36.8±4.5 in the MELD group, 26.0±8.1 in the CTP group, P=0.001). There was no difference in etiology for liver transplantation, 6-month survival rate, or in-hospital stay. However, complication rate and re-admission rate within the first 3 months were higher in the MELD group (78%, 56%). No one received a DDLT because of an incentive system for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: Despite the short-term follow-up period, the new allocation rule reflects the severity of the patients. Almost all patients who underwent DDLT when they had a high MELD score and then suffered from morbidity; however, this problem was associated with organ shortage, not the allocation system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统前后死亡供肝移植预后的比较研究:单中心经验
背景:2016年6月,韩国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)的分配系统取代了基于child - turcote - pugh (CTP)评分的死亡供肝移植(DDLT)分配系统。本研究旨在揭示MELD系统前后的变化。方法:从2015年1月至2017年3月,从单个中心接受DDLT的患者中收集71个患者数据点。根据分配制度将患者分为两组(MELD组41例,CTP组30例)。结果:两组MELD评分差异有统计学意义(MELD组36.8±4.5分,CTP组26.0±8.1分,P=0.001)。肝移植的病因、6个月生存率和住院时间没有差异。然而,MELD组前3个月内的并发症发生率和再入院率较高(78%,56%)。由于肝细胞癌的激励机制,没有人接受DDLT。结论:尽管随访时间较短,但新的分配规则反映了患者的严重程度。几乎所有在MELD评分较高时接受DDLT的患者都出现了发病率;然而,这个问题与器官短缺有关,而不是分配制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation Pediatric liver transplantation in Korea: long-term outcomes and allocations A case of Castleman disease that improved after kidney transplantation Donor Specific Antibody Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection after ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation Successful Treatment of Invasive Gastric Mucormycosis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1