Users to the rescue: the role of user-generated content (UGC) in the Minnesota affordable care act (ACA) website launch

L. Breuch
{"title":"Users to the rescue: the role of user-generated content (UGC) in the Minnesota affordable care act (ACA) website launch","authors":"L. Breuch","doi":"10.1145/2775441.2775466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the potential of User-Generated Content (UGC) as a site of research for web usability. Specifically, this paper shares a case study of blog responses that detailed user experiences with the 2013 launch of MNsure.org, a high-stakes website created to facilitate the online purchase of health insurance in response to the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA). A content analysis of blog responses, informed by qualitative content analysis [1], revealed poor usability of the site, including a low effectiveness rate, several critical errors, and low satisfaction. User stories were remarkably detailed, offering valuable information for website repairs. Connections between UGC and traditional web usability methods such as usability testing were explored in terms of \"community,\" \"participation,\" and \"metrics.\" Overall, the case demonstrated the potential value of UGC content analysis as a complement to traditional usability testing.","PeriodicalId":340459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2775466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper examines the potential of User-Generated Content (UGC) as a site of research for web usability. Specifically, this paper shares a case study of blog responses that detailed user experiences with the 2013 launch of MNsure.org, a high-stakes website created to facilitate the online purchase of health insurance in response to the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA). A content analysis of blog responses, informed by qualitative content analysis [1], revealed poor usability of the site, including a low effectiveness rate, several critical errors, and low satisfaction. User stories were remarkably detailed, offering valuable information for website repairs. Connections between UGC and traditional web usability methods such as usability testing were explored in terms of "community," "participation," and "metrics." Overall, the case demonstrated the potential value of UGC content analysis as a complement to traditional usability testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户拯救:用户生成内容(UGC)在明尼苏达州平价医疗法案(ACA)网站启动中的作用
本文考察了用户生成内容(UGC)作为网站可用性研究站点的潜力。具体而言,本文将分享一个博客案例研究,该案例详细介绍了2013年推出的MNsure.org网站的用户体验。MNsure.org是一个高风险网站,旨在促进在线购买医疗保险,以响应2010年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)。根据定性内容分析[1]对博客回应进行的内容分析显示,该网站的可用性很差,包括效率低、几个关键错误和低满意度。用户故事非常详细,为网站维修提供了有价值的信息。UGC与传统的网络可用性方法(如可用性测试)之间的联系在“社区”、“参与”和“指标”方面进行了探讨。总的来说,这个案例展示了UGC内容分析作为传统可用性测试补充的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Socio-technical gaps in online collaborative consumption (OCC): an example of the etsy community Factors to actors: implications of posthumanism for social justice work Target data breach: applying user-centered design principles to data breach notifications Envisioning mobile apps for audio description: exploring universal design of national park service brochures HART: the human affect recording tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1