Analysis of Vocational School Students' Error in Solving Linear Program Problems

Enjang Jaenal, H. D. Putra, A. I. Sugandi, H. Hendriana
{"title":"Analysis of Vocational School Students' Error in Solving Linear Program Problems","authors":"Enjang Jaenal, H. D. Putra, A. I. Sugandi, H. Hendriana","doi":"10.22460/jiml.v6i3.17964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reality on the ground shows that students still make mistakes in solving problems in the form of Linear Program stories. This study aims to describe students' mistakes in solving word problems in linear programming material. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. The subjects in this study were class X students of Karya Bahana Vocational School, Bekasi City. The instrument in this study was in the form of 5 questions in the form of descriptions. In addition to the instrument in the form of tests, interviews were used to dig deeper into students' answers to the questions presented. The results showed that the most errors made by students were in the aspect of errors in writing the final answers, and the fewest errors were in the aspects of transformation errors. The cause of reading errors is that students are unable to interpret sentences correctly and cannot find key words and important information. The cause of the error in understanding the problem was that students did not include the known data and the data asked. The causes of errors in the transformation are students not being able to model everyday sentences into mathematical symbols and errors in using mathematical operations. The cause of the process skill error was that the student was unable to write down the objective function and the student was unable to continue with the answer, while the cause of the error in writing the final solution was the inability of the student to draw conclusions correctly.","PeriodicalId":294861,"journal":{"name":"(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v6i3.17964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reality on the ground shows that students still make mistakes in solving problems in the form of Linear Program stories. This study aims to describe students' mistakes in solving word problems in linear programming material. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. The subjects in this study were class X students of Karya Bahana Vocational School, Bekasi City. The instrument in this study was in the form of 5 questions in the form of descriptions. In addition to the instrument in the form of tests, interviews were used to dig deeper into students' answers to the questions presented. The results showed that the most errors made by students were in the aspect of errors in writing the final answers, and the fewest errors were in the aspects of transformation errors. The cause of reading errors is that students are unable to interpret sentences correctly and cannot find key words and important information. The cause of the error in understanding the problem was that students did not include the known data and the data asked. The causes of errors in the transformation are students not being able to model everyday sentences into mathematical symbols and errors in using mathematical operations. The cause of the process skill error was that the student was unable to write down the objective function and the student was unable to continue with the answer, while the cause of the error in writing the final solution was the inability of the student to draw conclusions correctly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高职学生解线性规划问题的误差分析
实际情况表明,学生们在以线性规划故事的形式解决问题时仍然会犯错误。本研究旨在描述学生在线性规划教材中解题时的错误。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法。本研究以别加西市Karya Bahana职业学校X班学生为研究对象。本研究的工具以5个问题的形式,以描述的形式进行。除了测试形式的工具外,访谈被用来更深入地挖掘学生对所提出问题的答案。结果表明,学生犯的错误最多的是在写最终答案方面的错误,最少的是在转换方面的错误。阅读错误的原因是学生不能正确地解释句子,找不到关键词和重要信息。错误理解问题的原因是学生没有包括已知数据和要求的数据。转换错误的原因是学生不能将日常句子建模为数学符号和使用数学运算错误。过程技能错误的原因是学生无法写下目标函数,学生无法继续答案,而最终解决方案写作错误的原因是学生无法正确得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Solving Jumping Task Questions based on Learning Style The Development of Geometric Rows and Sequences Problem-Based Learning with Liveworksheet Media How Do Teachers Solve Problem With Contradiction Information? Study of Prospective Teachers - Professional Teachers in Solving IDEAL Model Problems The Implementation of Scientific Approach to Increase Mathematical Understanding Ability on Junior High School Students The Implementation of Scientific Approach to Improve Mathematical Understanding Ability on Junior High School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1