The Coherence Analysis of Students' Analytical Exposition Texts

Nur Aeni Afiati Mafuroh, Yusnita Sylvia Ningrum
{"title":"The Coherence Analysis of Students' Analytical Exposition Texts","authors":"Nur Aeni Afiati Mafuroh, Yusnita Sylvia Ningrum","doi":"10.15294/elt.v8i1.26747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the coherence of 19 analytical exposition texts written by the fourth semester students of English Department of UNNES through analysis of schematic structure, thematic choices, and thematic developments. Coherence is an essential component to create a make-sense text. Thus, it is very important to know the students’ competency in writing a good text. This study applied a qualitative approach. It employed theories of schematic structure based on stages proposed by Gerot and Wignell (1995), thematic choices from Gerot and Wignell (1995) and thematic developments by Eggins (2004). The findings indicated that students preferably used topical Theme (67.79%) and textual Theme (30.42%). In addition, in terms of thematic developments, Theme Reiteration is the commonest pattern applied by the students. Based on the findings, students’ texts were less coherence because there were several texts having an incomplete thesis at the beginning of the paragraph and one text leaving 1 out of 3 stages of exposition text. Furthermore, the over-use of Theme Reiteration might show that the students’ writing skill is low because they could not elaborate their ideas through various methods. In short, the students could be regarded as novice writers. \nKeywords: analytical exposition; coherence; schematic structure; thematic choices; thematic development","PeriodicalId":395606,"journal":{"name":"ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i1.26747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the coherence of 19 analytical exposition texts written by the fourth semester students of English Department of UNNES through analysis of schematic structure, thematic choices, and thematic developments. Coherence is an essential component to create a make-sense text. Thus, it is very important to know the students’ competency in writing a good text. This study applied a qualitative approach. It employed theories of schematic structure based on stages proposed by Gerot and Wignell (1995), thematic choices from Gerot and Wignell (1995) and thematic developments by Eggins (2004). The findings indicated that students preferably used topical Theme (67.79%) and textual Theme (30.42%). In addition, in terms of thematic developments, Theme Reiteration is the commonest pattern applied by the students. Based on the findings, students’ texts were less coherence because there were several texts having an incomplete thesis at the beginning of the paragraph and one text leaving 1 out of 3 stages of exposition text. Furthermore, the over-use of Theme Reiteration might show that the students’ writing skill is low because they could not elaborate their ideas through various methods. In short, the students could be regarded as novice writers. Keywords: analytical exposition; coherence; schematic structure; thematic choices; thematic development
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生分析性论述语篇的连贯分析
本研究旨在通过对图式结构、主题选择和主题发展的分析,揭示联合国尼斯大学英语系第四学期学生所写的19篇分析性说明性课文的连贯性。连贯是创造有意义的文本的重要组成部分。因此,了解学生写一篇好文章的能力是非常重要的。本研究采用定性方法。它采用了Gerot和Wignell(1995)提出的基于阶段的图式结构理论、Gerot和Wignell(1995)的主题选择理论和Eggins(2004)的主题发展理论。调查结果显示,学生更倾向于使用话题主题(67.79%)和篇章主题(30.42%)。此外,在主位展开方面,主位重述是学生使用最多的模式。根据调查结果,学生的文本连贯性较差,因为有几个文本在段落开头有一个不完整的论文,一个文本在三个阶段的阐述文本中留下了一个。此外,过度使用主题重申可能表明学生的写作水平较低,因为他们无法通过各种方法阐述自己的想法。总之,这些学生可以被看作是新手作家。关键词:分析性论述;一致性;原理结构;主题的选择;主题的发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing health science students’ English language lacks: learners’ needs analysis Parity of learning tasks in New Total English coursebooks Exploring assessment practices of teachers in Advanced Speech courses Literature-based instruction and language learner autonomy: A case study of a tertiary EFL reading course “Teaching Unplugged”: An Approach For Designing An EFL Teacher Education at Disadvantaged Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1