Ommaya Reservoir Related Complications: A Single Center Experience and Review of Current Literature

Azka Ali, R. Bosse, B. Doonan, P. Narayan, Grant Jester, J. DeLaune, Jacob Barish, Samantha Welniak, H. Norton, C. Heldermon
{"title":"Ommaya Reservoir Related Complications: A Single Center Experience and Review of Current Literature","authors":"Azka Ali, R. Bosse, B. Doonan, P. Narayan, Grant Jester, J. DeLaune, Jacob Barish, Samantha Welniak, H. Norton, C. Heldermon","doi":"10.11648/J.IJCOCR.20190402.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First introduced in 1963, ommaya reservoirs (OmRs) are indwelling intraventricular catheters used for decompression of hydrocephalus, antibiotics, and chemotherapy delivery. They are important alternatives when lumbar punctures are not practical or when long-term administration of medications is needed. Despite being used for over 50 years, placement of these devices can still contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective review at the University of Florida Cancer Center evaluating OmR related complications in patients in whom OmR was placed for chemotherapy. We also conducted a systematic review of OmR related and LP complications in setting of chemotherapy delivery. 13 patients met criteria for inclusion in this retrospective study. Time points evaluated for complications were: placement, up to 6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months, removal and post-discharge. Our institutional data showed a complicated rate of <7% at each time point. For systematic review, 38 studies were reviewed for OmR data, and 8 studies were reviewed for LP data. Infectious complications were more prevalent in OmR studies with statistical significance (p=0.0017), whereas noninfectious complications were more prevalent in LP studies with statistical significance (p=0.0004). This study compared complication rates from infectious and non-infectious sources between patients receiving intrathecal chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoirs versus lumbar puncture. OmR can be very useful in long-term administration of medication, and the relatively high complication rate (especially infectious) can be deemed an acceptable risk for patient population with high morbidity.","PeriodicalId":158614,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJCOCR.20190402.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

First introduced in 1963, ommaya reservoirs (OmRs) are indwelling intraventricular catheters used for decompression of hydrocephalus, antibiotics, and chemotherapy delivery. They are important alternatives when lumbar punctures are not practical or when long-term administration of medications is needed. Despite being used for over 50 years, placement of these devices can still contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective review at the University of Florida Cancer Center evaluating OmR related complications in patients in whom OmR was placed for chemotherapy. We also conducted a systematic review of OmR related and LP complications in setting of chemotherapy delivery. 13 patients met criteria for inclusion in this retrospective study. Time points evaluated for complications were: placement, up to 6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months, removal and post-discharge. Our institutional data showed a complicated rate of <7% at each time point. For systematic review, 38 studies were reviewed for OmR data, and 8 studies were reviewed for LP data. Infectious complications were more prevalent in OmR studies with statistical significance (p=0.0017), whereas noninfectious complications were more prevalent in LP studies with statistical significance (p=0.0004). This study compared complication rates from infectious and non-infectious sources between patients receiving intrathecal chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoirs versus lumbar puncture. OmR can be very useful in long-term administration of medication, and the relatively high complication rate (especially infectious) can be deemed an acceptable risk for patient population with high morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ommaya水库相关并发症:单一中心经验和当前文献综述
OmRs于1963年首次引入,是脑室内留置导管,用于脑积水减压、抗生素和化疗输送。当腰椎穿刺不实际或需要长期用药时,它们是重要的替代方案。尽管使用了50多年,这些装置的放置仍然可能导致显著的发病率和死亡率。我们在佛罗里达大学癌症中心进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,评估了OmR接受化疗的患者的OmR相关并发症。我们还进行了一项系统的回顾,在化疗递送设置OmR相关和LP并发症。13例患者符合纳入本回顾性研究的标准。评估并发症的时间点为:放置、6个月、6-12个月、> 12个月、取出和出院后。我们的机构数据显示,每个时间点的复杂比率都小于7%。在系统评价中,38项研究纳入了OmR数据,8项研究纳入了LP数据。感染性并发症在OmR研究中更为普遍,差异有统计学意义(p=0.0017),而非感染性并发症在LP研究中更为普遍,差异有统计学意义(p=0.0004)。本研究比较了通过Ommaya贮液器和腰椎穿刺接受鞘内化疗的患者的感染性和非感染性并发症发生率。OmR在长期给药中非常有用,相对较高的并发症发生率(特别是传染性)可被认为是高发病率患者群体可接受的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit and Analysis of Causes of Treatment Default in Head and Neck Cancer: A Single Tertiary Cancer Centre Experience Comparative Study of Whole Brain Radiotherapy vs Whole Brain Radiotherapy with Concurrent Temozolomide in Brain Metastases Prognostic Factors for Prostate Cancer at the Brazzaville University Hospital Center Epidemiological, Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Evolutionary Profile of Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) in the Oncology-Hematology Service, Burkina Faso Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix: Screening and Management at the Matam Maternity Hospital and the Donka Gynaecological Cancer Prevention Centre (Guinea)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1