Supply-side economics and the 2017 Tax Act

Clark V. Johnson
{"title":"Supply-side economics and the 2017 Tax Act","authors":"Clark V. Johnson","doi":"10.1453/jepe.v5i1.1556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Abstract. Several of the designers of the 2017 Tax Act were prominent as ‘supply side‛ advocates at the time of Reagan tax cuts during the 1980s. The economic argument for supply side tax rate reductions drew on a policy mix framework developed by Robert Mundell as early as 1962. Within that framework, the easy fiscal/ tight monetary policy solution was intended for circumstances of either pressure on reserves or the exchange rate (as during the Kennedy Administration) or of serious domestic inflation (as under the Carter and Reagan Administrations). Tax cuts in the US since the 1980s have not had the intended stimulus effects because neither the currency weakness nor inflationary preconditions have existed. Absent such conditions, tax rate reductions will generate either domestic over-heating or a redistribution of income to those in higher brackets. Any argument in favor of the 2017 Tax Act should not fall back on Mundell’s policy mix advocacy. In contrast, the case for an easy fiscal/ tight money policy may have unexpected force in situations of fixed exchange rates, or where domestic monetary policy options are otherwise constrained or absent – as in Eurozone periphery countries. Keywords. Supply side economics, Robert Mundell, Policy Mix classifications, 2017 Tax Act, Eurozone macroeconomics. JEL. B30, E30, E50, E60, F20.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v5i1.1556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Abstract. Several of the designers of the 2017 Tax Act were prominent as ‘supply side‛ advocates at the time of Reagan tax cuts during the 1980s. The economic argument for supply side tax rate reductions drew on a policy mix framework developed by Robert Mundell as early as 1962. Within that framework, the easy fiscal/ tight monetary policy solution was intended for circumstances of either pressure on reserves or the exchange rate (as during the Kennedy Administration) or of serious domestic inflation (as under the Carter and Reagan Administrations). Tax cuts in the US since the 1980s have not had the intended stimulus effects because neither the currency weakness nor inflationary preconditions have existed. Absent such conditions, tax rate reductions will generate either domestic over-heating or a redistribution of income to those in higher brackets. Any argument in favor of the 2017 Tax Act should not fall back on Mundell’s policy mix advocacy. In contrast, the case for an easy fiscal/ tight money policy may have unexpected force in situations of fixed exchange rates, or where domestic monetary policy options are otherwise constrained or absent – as in Eurozone periphery countries. Keywords. Supply side economics, Robert Mundell, Policy Mix classifications, 2017 Tax Act, Eurozone macroeconomics. JEL. B30, E30, E50, E60, F20.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供给侧经济学和2017年税法
摘要摘要在上世纪80年代里根减税时期,2017年税法的几位设计者都是“供给侧”的倡导者。供给侧降低税率的经济学论据借鉴了罗伯特·蒙代尔早在1962年就提出的一个政策组合框架。在这一框架下,宽松的财政/紧缩的货币政策解决方案是针对储备或汇率压力(如肯尼迪政府时期)或严重的国内通货膨胀(如卡特和里根政府时期)的情况。自上世纪80年代以来,美国的减税措施并未产生预期的刺激效果,因为货币疲软和通胀前提都不存在。如果没有这些条件,减税要么会导致国内经济过热,要么会导致收入向高收入阶层再分配。任何支持2017年税法的论点都不应该依赖于蒙代尔的政策组合倡导。相比之下,宽松的财政/紧缩的货币政策可能会在固定汇率的情况下产生意想不到的力量,或者在国内货币政策选择受到限制或缺乏的情况下——比如欧元区外围国家。关键词。供给侧经济学,罗伯特·蒙代尔,政策组合分类,2017年税法,欧元区宏观经济学。冻胶。B30 e30 e50 e60 f20
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The determinants of the intermediate products export: The case of Switzerland Bank credit and transmission mechanisms of monetary policy in Uganda The contribution of human capital to the economic development of Cameroon, 1980-2018 Are they willing to participate? A review on behavioral economics approach to voters turnout Financialization and political economy of financial regulation in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1