From gut feel to educated approximations: Towards an integrated approach for technology valuation

M. Dissel, D. Probert, R. Mitchell
{"title":"From gut feel to educated approximations: Towards an integrated approach for technology valuation","authors":"M. Dissel, D. Probert, R. Mitchell","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand the potential value of a technology a wide range of techniques is available. Examples are quantitative techniques such as discounted cash-flow, real options and decision trees and qualitative techniques such as roadmaps and scoring cards. However, very little has been written about their integrated use and more particularly over the life cycle of a technology. Whereas many companies have their own processes in place often combining qualitative and quantitative techniques, very few empirical studies have been performed to learn from these industry practices and provide an overall view on the process of valuing technologies. In this paper we propose an integrated approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Based on ongoing case study research we will elaborate on the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods, and will provide a conceptual basis for integrating these techniques. By seamlessly integrating the qualitative foundations with quantitative projections, judgements can be turned into justification models (using for example decision trees and real options thinking), and scoring mechanisms can turn the collected gut feel into educated approximations for probabilities and financial projections. Although we do not assume a generic decision making process can be defined, the integrated logic provides a more consistent guide for R&D managers and adds to the body of literature, more particularly empirical studies, on the selection and use of a diverse set of valuation tools.","PeriodicalId":168329,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To understand the potential value of a technology a wide range of techniques is available. Examples are quantitative techniques such as discounted cash-flow, real options and decision trees and qualitative techniques such as roadmaps and scoring cards. However, very little has been written about their integrated use and more particularly over the life cycle of a technology. Whereas many companies have their own processes in place often combining qualitative and quantitative techniques, very few empirical studies have been performed to learn from these industry practices and provide an overall view on the process of valuing technologies. In this paper we propose an integrated approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Based on ongoing case study research we will elaborate on the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods, and will provide a conceptual basis for integrating these techniques. By seamlessly integrating the qualitative foundations with quantitative projections, judgements can be turned into justification models (using for example decision trees and real options thinking), and scoring mechanisms can turn the collected gut feel into educated approximations for probabilities and financial projections. Although we do not assume a generic decision making process can be defined, the integrated logic provides a more consistent guide for R&D managers and adds to the body of literature, more particularly empirical studies, on the selection and use of a diverse set of valuation tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从直觉到有根据的近似:走向技术评估的综合方法
要了解一项技术的潜在价值,可以使用各种各样的技术。例如,贴现现金流、实物期权和决策树等定量技术,以及路线图和计分卡等定性技术。然而,很少有关于它们的综合使用的文章,特别是在技术的生命周期中。尽管许多公司都有自己的流程,通常结合定性和定量技术,但很少有实证研究从这些行业实践中学习,并提供对技术评估过程的总体看法。在本文中,我们提出了一种综合的方法,结合定性和定量技术。基于正在进行的案例研究,我们将详细阐述定性和定量方法的使用,并将提供整合这些技术的概念基础。通过将定性基础与定量预测无缝集成,判断可以转化为论证模型(例如使用决策树和实物期权思维),评分机制可以将收集到的直觉转化为概率和财务预测的有根据的近似。尽管我们不假设可以定义一个通用的决策过程,但集成逻辑为研发经理提供了更一致的指导,并增加了关于选择和使用多种评估工具的文献,特别是实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the emergence of disruptive innovation in Air Force science and technology organizations A future-based risk assessment for the survivability of long-range strike systems The nature of engineering work in innovation activities Towards systematic innovation methods: Innovation support technology that integrates business modeling, roadmapping and innovation architecture The leverage effect of holistic engineering and technology management to sustain a developing economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1