Ethical dilemmas in sharing transformative experiences with patients in a clinical setting: A Reflective Account

Maryanne Khan
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas in sharing transformative experiences with patients in a clinical setting: A Reflective Account","authors":"Maryanne Khan","doi":"10.2478/ijtr-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I write this article as a postgraduate researcher undertaking a doctorate in Education, with an interest in research as a transformative process, and fascinated by the debate as to whether reality is objective or subjective. In reflecting on this, I recalled a significant incident that occurred when I was Professional Education Lead in an NHS hospital. I had been asked to work with a nurse, who had been disciplined as a consequence of talking about her Christian faith with a patient. The nurse was assuming that, in sharing experiences that were transformative for her, she might also transform the patient’s perception of her own illness and its meaning. As a Christian myself, I was caught in a situation where I could understand the conflicting perspectives of all key players, including the patient, her family, the nurse, and the NHS managers. I explore how I mediated my way through this situation, aiming to do justice to all perspectives, and the ethical dilemmas I faced when having to choose between personal and professional values. As a consequence of this incident, I have learned that, not only is transformation a deeply personal experience, but because it is either influenced by, or leads to, a specific world view, it supports the idea of reality being subjective rather than objective.","PeriodicalId":142117,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Transformative Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Transformative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijtr-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract I write this article as a postgraduate researcher undertaking a doctorate in Education, with an interest in research as a transformative process, and fascinated by the debate as to whether reality is objective or subjective. In reflecting on this, I recalled a significant incident that occurred when I was Professional Education Lead in an NHS hospital. I had been asked to work with a nurse, who had been disciplined as a consequence of talking about her Christian faith with a patient. The nurse was assuming that, in sharing experiences that were transformative for her, she might also transform the patient’s perception of her own illness and its meaning. As a Christian myself, I was caught in a situation where I could understand the conflicting perspectives of all key players, including the patient, her family, the nurse, and the NHS managers. I explore how I mediated my way through this situation, aiming to do justice to all perspectives, and the ethical dilemmas I faced when having to choose between personal and professional values. As a consequence of this incident, I have learned that, not only is transformation a deeply personal experience, but because it is either influenced by, or leads to, a specific world view, it supports the idea of reality being subjective rather than objective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床环境中与患者分享变革经验的伦理困境:反思帐户
我是作为一名攻读教育学博士学位的研究生研究员写这篇文章的,我对作为变革过程的研究很感兴趣,并且对现实是客观的还是主观的争论很感兴趣。在反思这一点时,我想起了我在一家NHS医院担任专业教育主管时发生的一件重大事件。我被要求和一名护士一起工作,她因为和病人谈论她的基督教信仰而受到纪律处分。这位护士认为,在分享对她有改变意义的经历时,她可能也会改变病人对自己疾病及其意义的看法。作为一名基督徒,我陷入了一种局面,我可以理解所有关键人物的冲突观点,包括病人、她的家人、护士和NHS管理人员。我探讨了我如何在这种情况下调解自己的方式,旨在公正地对待所有的观点,以及当我不得不在个人价值和职业价值之间做出选择时所面临的道德困境。这件事的结果是,我了解到,转变不仅是一种深刻的个人经历,而且因为它要么受到特定世界观的影响,要么导致特定世界观,它支持现实是主观的而不是客观的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Postmaterial Participatory Research: Exploring the nature of self with children Once there was a ‘morung’ Implications of postmaterialist theories of consciousness for psychiatry: towards an integral paradigm Finding the Axis Mundi in an Undergraduate Classroom ‘You’re Alive!’: On the ‘Livingness’ of Spirited Educational Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1