On the clustering of cognitive learning theories

B. Mayer
{"title":"On the clustering of cognitive learning theories","authors":"B. Mayer","doi":"10.15293/2226-3365.1802.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . The research problem is the contradiction between a large number of different cognitive learning theories and the lack of clustering based on traditional notions of a person's sociality. The aim of the work is to cluster several dozen cognitive learning theories created within the framework of analytical philosophy on the basis of their unification by: the place of the theories in the learning process, the content of the cognitive process, the concepts of the content of the learning process, and the formation of trainee qualities. Materials and Methods . Research methods include a comparative analysis of cognitive learning theories on the basis of their basic intentions, combining theories on meta-concepts about the learning process and their subsequent subdivision into four clusters. Results. Seventeen cognitive learning theories developed over the last 60-70 years within the framework of analytical philosophy are analyzed. As a result, four clusters of cognitive learning theories are distinguished on the basis of the following concepts: the place of cognitive theories in learning, the nature of the cognitive process in learning, the content of the learning process, and the formation of trainee qualities. Conclusions . On the basis of the results obtained, the conclusion is drawn that modern cognitive learning concepts are based on \"analytical\" philosophy, since the sociality of a person falls out of the cognitive concepts examined. In fact, it is a question of forming the qualities of an individual, but not of an individual, which is typical enough for an analytical approach, and the ideas about the learning process are of a purely technological nature.","PeriodicalId":226844,"journal":{"name":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1802.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction . The research problem is the contradiction between a large number of different cognitive learning theories and the lack of clustering based on traditional notions of a person's sociality. The aim of the work is to cluster several dozen cognitive learning theories created within the framework of analytical philosophy on the basis of their unification by: the place of the theories in the learning process, the content of the cognitive process, the concepts of the content of the learning process, and the formation of trainee qualities. Materials and Methods . Research methods include a comparative analysis of cognitive learning theories on the basis of their basic intentions, combining theories on meta-concepts about the learning process and their subsequent subdivision into four clusters. Results. Seventeen cognitive learning theories developed over the last 60-70 years within the framework of analytical philosophy are analyzed. As a result, four clusters of cognitive learning theories are distinguished on the basis of the following concepts: the place of cognitive theories in learning, the nature of the cognitive process in learning, the content of the learning process, and the formation of trainee qualities. Conclusions . On the basis of the results obtained, the conclusion is drawn that modern cognitive learning concepts are based on "analytical" philosophy, since the sociality of a person falls out of the cognitive concepts examined. In fact, it is a question of forming the qualities of an individual, but not of an individual, which is typical enough for an analytical approach, and the ideas about the learning process are of a purely technological nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论认知学习理论的聚类
介绍。研究的问题是大量不同的认知学习理论与基于人的社会性的传统观念缺乏聚类之间的矛盾。这项工作的目的是在统一的基础上,在分析哲学框架内创建的几十个认知学习理论:理论在学习过程中的地位,认知过程的内容,学习过程内容的概念,以及学员素质的形成。材料与方法。研究方法包括根据认知学习理论的基本意图对其进行比较分析,结合学习过程的元概念理论并将其细分为四类。结果。本文分析了过去60-70年间在分析哲学框架内发展起来的17种认知学习理论。因此,根据认知学习理论在学习中的地位、学习中认知过程的性质、学习过程的内容、学员素质的形成等概念,将认知学习理论分为四类。结论。根据所获得的结果,得出的结论是,现代认知学习概念是建立在“分析”哲学的基础上的,因为一个人的社会性不属于所研究的认知概念。事实上,这是一个形成个人品质的问题,而不是个体的问题,这对于分析方法来说是足够典型的,关于学习过程的想法是纯技术性质的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing students’ professional competencies within an active educational environment Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective) Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education The regularities of developing students’ legal culture within a university educational environment Developing legal culture of a personality in the knowledge society: Conceptual foundations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1